Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Affirmative Action Destroying Hiring Standards in Law Enforcement

LAPD corruptionLA cop sentenced to 102 years

Had five felony arrests for burglary- and theft-related offenses BEFORE being hired by the LAPD

By James Edwards
Political Cesspool Blog

Over the past several years, the electronic and print media have featured quite a few reports and articles on the problem of corruption in the Los Angeles police department. And it’s a big one - check out the Ramparts scandal. Read LAbyrinth. But what most of them don’t like to mention is the fact that the corrupt cops are overwhelmingly non-white. On the rare occasions when they do mention it, they certainly don’t dwell on it, let alone explore just how so many bad apples have gotten hired to enforce the law. That’s a road they don’t want to go down, because it leads right to affirmative action.

The latest headlines involve a group of cops who were committing home invasion style armed robberies. The ringleader, Ruben Palomares, was sentenced to 13 years in prison last week. Yesterday another non-white former cop, William Ferguson, was sentenced to 102 years for his role in the robberies. His brother, a Long Beach policeman, was also in the gang.

We’ll be seeing more and more of this type of thing in the future, as police hiring standards keep getting lower and lower to allow them to hire enough non-whites to “reflect” the city’s demographics. And I’m not just talking about test scores. That’s bad enough, but it doesn’t even begin to tell the story of how affirmative action has destroyed the hiring standards in law enforcement. Until the push for more non-whites on police forces began a few decades ago, in most cities, applicants for the police academy had to pass rigorous background checks and if they weren’t squeaky clean, they didn’t get in. Not anymore. Check out the background of William Ferguson:

Ferguson had five felony arrests for burglary- and theft-related offenses before being hired by the Los Angeles Police Department in 1996.

At one point, while trying to cite mitigating factors that might persuade Feess to impose a lesser sentence, Deitch told the judge that the incidents were not sufficiently serious to prevent him from being hired by the Police Department.

The judge shot back:

“To which I can only say, ‘Why?’ ”

(more…)

Join David & Don on Stormfront Radio Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays 4pm EST!

Click on Banner for Stormfront Radio Schedule

Live Radio Stream

David Duke & Don Black’s Wednesday, May 21st broadcast or Download
Join Don and David for another thought provoking program as they discuss Harmony Grant’s latest article on “Hate” Crime legislation (see here), they also discuss Barack Obama and the Presidential race along with taking a call from John Robinson, all this and much more only on today’s edition of Stormfront Radio! [MP3]

Black Racial Consciousness, Part I

Blacks celebrate what whites must deny.

What do blacks think about race? How do they experience race? How are they expected to think about and experience race? The contrast with whites in this respect could not be greater. For whites, race is not a permissible criterion either for personal decisions or public policy. Whites have no legitimate aspirations as a group, and do not usually think of themselves as a group unless they are called upon to apologize for past and present sins (see “The Racial Revolution,” AR, May 1999).

For most blacks, on the other hand, race is a central part of their identity. Their view of politics, history, government, or culture is intimately bound up in a racial consciousness that sets them apart from other groups. They take it for granted, for example, that the job of a black leader is to work for the benefit of blacks, without much regard for others.

Black power

They have, in other words, a deeply-rooted racial consciousness that can even express itself as alienation from the United States itself. For many whites, who have for the last 50 years generally tried very hard to banish race from their decision-making, the depth and power of black racial consciousness is difficult even to imagine, and when they encounter it in its full force they find it deeply disturbing.

As we will see, racial loyalty is so essential to blacks that they despise blacks who do not practice it sufficiently — who are not “black enough.” For whites, America’s primary moral mission is to overcome race, to go beyond group consciousness and embrace all citizens as individuals. Particularly for teachers, clergy, social workers, politicians, and even many corporate executives, to move beyond race is America’s great calling. Not for blacks. For a black to speak or act in ways that are obligatory for whites is to commit racial suicide. It is to court contempt and expulsion.

A Different World

Although they are not direct indicators of black racial consciousness, larger social indices suggest the extent to which blacks and whites live in separate worlds. To start with the seemingly innocuous, census records show that 100 years ago, the 20 most popular given names for blacks and whites were virtually the same. That began to change in the 1960s, when blacks started giving their children distinctly black names like Shaneequa, Latonya, or DeShawn. An investigation of every birth in California since 1961 found that in 1970, the typical black baby girl was given a name that was twice as common among blacks than whites. By 1980, her name was 20 times more common among blacks, and by 2004 more than 40 percent of black girls born in California got a name that was not given to a single one of the 100,000 white girls born that year. The racial gap was not limited to the West Coast. By 2003, there was no overlap among the top 20 black and white names given to girls in New York City. The gap in names for boys was not so great, because neither whites nor blacks are as adventurous with boys’ names, but there has been sharp divergence since the 1960s.

Another cleavage is in television viewing. Ever since 1987, none of the top ten programs blacks watch has been among the top ten that whites watch. Blacks watch programs with black actors about blacks; whites watch white programs.

Racial loyalty is so essential to blacks that they despise anyone who is not “black enough.”

Blacks do not have the same politics as whites. The Bay Area Center for Voting Research surveyed voting patterns for 237 American cities and found that race is a proxy for a city’s politics: Black voters are liberal and white voters are conservative. As the center’s director explained: “Detroit and Provo epitomize America’s political, economic and racial polarization. As the most conservative city in America, Provo is overwhelmingly white and solidly middle class. This is in stark contrast to Detroit, which is impoverished, black and the most liberal.” He went on to note that, “While most black voters have consistently supported Democrats since the 1960s, it is the white liberals that have slowly withered away over the decades, leaving African Americans as the sole standard bearers for the left.”

These differences lead to clear divisions on concrete political choices. No fewer than 74 percent of blacks believe that it is the government’s responsibility to “assure the availability of jobs,” whereas only 33 percent of whites think this. In 1996, 84 percent of blacks but only 43 percent of whites voted for Bill Clinton.

Many whites find some black opinions startling. Only 13 percent of blacks think O.J. Simpson was “probably guilty” of killing his wife, but 73 percent believe it is true that “the CIA has imported cocaine for distribution in the black community.” Sixty-two percent “believe that HIV and AIDS are being used as part of a plot to deliberately kill African Americans.” When solid majorities of blacks think the government is trying to hook them on cocaine and kill them with AIDS, we have moved well beyond different choices in children’s names and divergent television habits. Blacks and whites often do not see the world in the same way. These differences are clearly bound up somehow in race itself.

(more...)

“Bilderberg Group” Meeting Confirmed: Chantilly, VA June 5-8

Veteran Bilderberg sleuth Jim Tucker has confirmed via three separate sources that the Bilderberg Group will meet this year in Chantilly Virginia at the Westfields Marriott hotel from June 5-8. Tucker told The Alex Jones Show that the earlier story claiming Bilderberg had already met in Athens Greece was a possible ruse to misdirect attention from the real scene of the crime.

The Bilderberg Group comprises around 200 top elitists in government, banking, business, media and academia who meet annually in semi-secrecy and shape the destiny of the world yet are subject to little or no mainstream media scrutiny.

As we discovered last week, original reports that Bilderberg had already met in Athens Greece turned out to be incorrect after Dutch newspapers and the Dutch Embassy let slip that Netherlands Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende was set to attend Bilderberg in Chantilly after a meeting with George W. Bush.

The Bilderberg gathering is now set to take place from June 5-8 and as expected, it will be held at the Westfields Marriott hotel, the same venue of the 2002 meeting. Tucker called the Dutch Embassy and was passed over to the Dutch Embassy in the United States, who confirmed that the meeting would be in Chantilly.

“I called the Dutch embassy….they confirmed yes - I asked the question twice I made sure I got it right - yes they will be at Chantilly and of course it will be the Westfields Marriott - Westfields is all booked up,” said Tucker, adding that his source inside Bilderberg also confirmed that the meeting will take place in Chantilly.

“A man who’s an international financial consultant who knows a lot of Bilderberg people personally….he’s helped us locate Bilderberg many times….he has also talked to his Bilderberg buddies who gave us additional confirmation just this morning that Chantilly is the scene of the crime,” Tucker added.

Tucker said he was all set to leave for Athens but decided to stay after he discovered that secretaries who routinely attend Bilderberg were all going to be in Washington. The fact that armed guards were not stationed outside the hotel in Athens also indicated that Bilderberg were not meeting there.

Tucker said it was possible that the Athens story was a ruse to “lead people the wrong way, because they do not like to be exposed.”

Tucker added that he will be checking into the Hilton in Herndon, Va, which is the closest and cheapest hotel to the Westfields Marriott.

“It surprised me because they were here two years ago and their routine has been three years in Europe and one year somewhere in North America - Canada or the United States,” said Tucker, adding that for a while he thought Japan was going to be the venue because the G8 is meeting in Japan for the first time ever this year.

Tucker encouraged activists to turn out and cover the meeting because the American corporate media routinely self-censors and refuses to report on Bilderberg, whereas a smattering of reports do come out when Bilderberg meets in Europe or Canada. Even the Turkish media proved it was more open than the US press last year when several newspaper and TV news stations reported on Bilderberg’s meeting in Istanbul.

According to Bilderberg.org, the Dutch Embassy’s decision to let the cat out of the bag and announce the venue of Bilderberg may, “Indicate that there are people in the Dutch government, maybe even including the Dutch PM himself, who are not happy about the secrecy upon which Rockefeller, Kissinger and the other Bilderberg chiefs insist.”

Tucker has published his “Bilderberg Itinerary” which lays out how he will cover the meeting. A reprint appears below. Alex Jones has also confirmed that he will be traveling to Washington to cover the meeting with his film crew.

Bilderberg meet at the luxurious Westfields Marriott resort from Thursday, June 5, to Sunday, June 8, at Chantilly, Va., near Washington’s Dulles International Airport.

The address: Westfields Marriott, 14750 Conference Center Drive, Chantilly, Va. 20151. Phone: 703-818-0300

On Wednesday, June 4, I will check into the Hilton in Herndon, Va., the closest and cheapest motel ($270+ tax daily). The address: 13869 Park Center Road, Herndon, Va. 20171. Phone: 703-478-2900

While I have a lot of help from both journalists and broadcasters in Europe few, if any, will be in Chantilly because of their budget limitations. (They lack the dedicated readers who help finance these missions.)

You can be sure that Donald Graham and Jimmy Lee Hoagland, chairman and associate editor of The Washington Post, respectfully, will attend as usual. The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, The Financial Times and executives of the broadcast networks have also attended, among other journalistic whores, on their solemn promises of absolute secrecy. But you will read and hear nothing of this secret meeting of international financiers and political leaders.

Join us. You will help and you will have fun.

Cordially,

Jim Tucker

SOURCE>>>

NumbersUSA: Keep The Heat Turned Up On Sen. Feinstein’s AgJOBS Amnesty!

senator-dianne-feinstein-pushes-amnesty.jpgTuesday Amnesty Battle: Keep The Pressure On

Tuesday Game Plan: Keep the Faxes and Phone Calls Going

Dear opponents of amnesty and other rewards for illegal immigration,

You are making a difference. We broke a record for number of faxes ordered yesterday and our sources inside Capitol Hill are reporting an increased awareness of opposition to the AgJOBS amnesty among Congressional offices.

186,568 faxes were ordered yesterday!

23,185 faxes were ordered in one four-hour period!

We have not turned the corner, but if we can keep that sort of pressure on Congress all week, we have a shot at beating back the AgJOBS amnesty for up to 3 million illegal aliens. We are in much the same position as we were in yesterday. Our job right now is to make sure that every Senate office understands that their constituents strongly oppose the AgJOBS amnesty.

It all depends on you. Our Action Buffet team is busy posting new actions on your Action Buffet corkboard. Please go there immediately and send the faxes and make the phone calls we’ve posted on your Action Buffet. [www.numbersusa.com]

If you have never called a Congressional office, today is the day to start. It is easy and only takes a few minutes of your time. Please call your two Senators today to express your opposition to the AgJOBS amnesty.

202-224-3121

[Find out who your Senators are here. Click here to send a free fax to Congress.]

(more…)

The Military-Medical Complex



What a tangled web they weave...

University of Professor Peter Duesberg is the pre-eminent virologist in the world today and one of the top, if not the top, molecular biologists.

Unfortunately, he has a political problem.

He doesn't accept the still-unproven (and some say dubious) theory that the group of diseases known as AIDS is caused by HIV.

If "science" is wrong about the cause of AIDS, then finding a cure is impossible.

This may explain why a cure has not been found in spite of billions of dollars that has been raised and spent on AIDS "research."

But the waste of time and effort is only the tip of the iceberg.

There may be something more sinister afoot.

With a little understanding, the AIDS "help" trumpeted for Africa (by George Bush no less) and low income, minority families in the US looks less like medicine and more like a genocide program.

Who's behind this scam?

The answer may surprise you.

Note: The t-shirted "surfer dude" at the end of the first video is Kary Mullis.

He won the Nobel Prize winner for developing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), one of the fundamental tools of biomedicine and hailed as one of the monumental scientific techniques of the 20th century.

Not everyone buys the AIDS story as told by the media, the US government and the pharmaceutical companies.

How this scam plays out in Africa:

African Genocide

Balfour to Blair

Balfour to Blair, investigates the history of British policy in the Middle East from the beginning of the 20th century to today.

This is a must watch

Posted 5/19/08

Part 1

Part 2


PJB: Bush Plays the Hitler Card

by Patrick J. Buchanan

“A little learning is a dangerous thing,” wrote Alexander Pope.

Daily, our 43rd president testifies to Pope’s point.

Addressing the Knesset on the 60th anniversary of Israel’s birth, Bush said those who say we should negotiate with Iran or Hamas are like the fools who said we should negotiate with Adolf Hitler.

“As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared, ‘Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.’ We have an obligation to call this what it is — the false comfort of appeasement. …”

Again, Bush has made a hash of history.

Appeasement is the name given to what Neville Chamberlain did at Munich in September 1938. Rather than fight Germany in another great war — to keep 3.5 million Germans under a Czech rule they despised — he agreed to their peaceful transfer to German rule. With these Germans went the lands their ancestors had lived upon for centuries, German Bohemia, or the Sudetenland.

Chamberlain’s negotiated deal with Hitler averted a European war — at the expense of the Czech nation. That was appeasement.

German tanks, however, did not roll into Poland until a year later, Sept. 1, 1939. Why did the tanks roll? Because Poland refused to negotiate over Danzig, a Baltic port of 350,000 that was 95 percent German and had been taken from Germany at the Paris peace conference of 1919, in violation of Wilson’s 14 Points and his principle of self-determination.

Hitler had not wanted war with Poland. He had wanted an alliance with Poland in his anti-Comintern pact against Joseph Stalin.

But the Poles refused to negotiate. Why? Because they were a proud, defiant, heroic people and because Neville Chamberlain had insanely given an unsolicited war guarantee to Poland. If Hitler invaded, Chamberlain told the Poles, Britain would declare war on Germany.

From March to August 1939, Hitler tried to negotiate Danzig. But the Poles, confident in their British war guarantee, refused. So, Hitler cut his deal with Stalin, and the two invaded and divided Poland.

The cost of the war that came of a refusal to negotiate Danzig was millions of Polish dead, the Katyn massacre, Treblinka, Sobibor, Auschwitz, the annihilation of the Home Army in the Warsaw uprising of 1944, and 50 years of Nazi and Stalinist occupation, barbarism and terror.

In that same speech to the Knesset, Bush dismissed the idea we could ever successfully negotiate with Hamas, Hezbollah or Iran:

“Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them that they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before.”

But did not Ronald Reagan’s negotiations with the Evil Empire, as he rebuilt America’s military might, bear fruit in a reversal of Moscow’s imperial policy and an end to the Cold War?

Richard Nixon went to China and toasted the greatest mass murderer of them all, Mao Zedong, when Maoists were conducting a nationwide purge: the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. Yet, Nixon ended a quarter century of implacable U.S.-Chinese hostility. Was Nixon’s trip to China useless?

Three years after Nikita Khrushchev drowned the Hungarian revolution in blood, Ike had him up to Camp David. John Kennedy ended the most dangerous confrontation of the Cold War, the Cuban missile crisis, by negotiating with that same Butcher of Budapest.

Were Ike, JFK and Nixon all deluded fools? For the dictators they negotiated with — Khrushchev and Mao — were far greater mass murderers and enemies of America than is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Bush’s father negotiated with Syria’s Hafez al-Assad, the Butcher of Hama, and made him an American ally in the Gulf War.

Was President Bush’s father a deluded fool?

The president’s own diplomats negotiated an end to the nuclear program of Col. Gadhafi, who was responsible for the air massacre of American school kids over Lockerbie.

Bush’s own diplomats are negotiating with Kim Jong-il’s North Korea, a state sponsor of terror. Ambassador Ryan Crocker is negotiating with Iranians in Baghdad. Egypt is negotiating on behalf of Israel with Hamas to retrieve a captured Israeli soldier. Are they all deluded fools?

Bush refused to talk to Yasser Arafat because he was a terrorist. But four Israeli prime ministers negotiated with Arafat. Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin shared a Nobel Prize with him. “Bibi” Netanyahu ceded Hebron to him. Ehud Olmert offered him 95 percent of the West Bank.

Were all four Israeli leaders deluded fools?

True, the Chamberlain-Hitler summit at Munich proved a disaster, as did the FDR-Churchill-Stalin summits at Tehran and Yalta, and the JFK-Khrushchev summit in Vienna. But JFK’s diplomacy in the missile crisis may have averted a nuclear war. And Eisenhower, Nixon, Gerald Ford and Reagan all met with foreign dictators with blood on their hands, without loss to America, and sometimes with impressive gains.

What has Bush’s refusal to talk to Hamas, Hezbollah, Damascus and Tehran done to make either Israel or America more secure?

Duke International Live Web Radio - Some Classic Broadcasts

David Duke Speaks at Anti-Zionist Conference and pays homage to Ukrainian victims of Bolshevism

NEW TIME for DAVID DUKE LIVE. Hear David Duke’s LIVE Monday-Friday & Sunday at 2 pm EDT.

You can also now hear David Duke’s dynamic speech and closing remarks at the International Anti-Zionist Conference in Eastern Europe.

Connect HERE only during time of show: 2:00pm-3:00pm EDT.

You can e-mail or post your questions to Rep. Duke at duke.com and Stormfront.org Town Hall 24 hrs. a day.
………….


Rep. Duke’s Wednesday, June 22 Program or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, June 21 Program or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, June 20 Program or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, June 19 Program or Download
Rep. Duke’s Friday, June 17 Program or Download
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, June 16 Program or Download
Rep. Duke’s Wednesday, June 15 Program or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, June 14 Program or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, June 13 Program or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, June 12 Program or Download
Rep. Duke’s Friday, June 10 Program from Eastern Europe. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, June 9 exceptionally good Program from Eastern Europe. It deals with the Kiev Conference and has a good discussion of the Old South and what civil rights are really all about or Download
Rep. Duke’s Wednesday, June 8 Program from Eastern Europe. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, June 7 Program from Eastern Europe. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, June 6 Program from Eastern Europe. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, June 5 Program from Eastern Europe. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Friday, June 3 Closing Speech at an International Anti-Zionist Conference or Download
Rep. Duke’s Friday, June 3 Speech at an International Anti-Zionist Conference or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, May 30 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, May 29 program. or Download With Don Black
Rep. Duke’s Friday, May 27 program. or Download With Don Black
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, May 26 program. or Download With Don Black
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, May 24 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, May 19 program. or Download With Lady Michele Renouf
Rep. Duke’s Wednesday, May 18 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, May 17 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, May 15 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Friday, May 13 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, May 12 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Wednesday, May 11 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, May 10 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, May 9 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, May 8 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Friday, May 6 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, May 5 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Wednesday, May 4 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, May 3 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, May 2 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, May 1 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, April 30 interview program with Christopher Bollyn. or Download Rep. Duke’s Friday, April 29 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, April 28 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Wednesday, April 27 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, April 26 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, April 25 program. or Download 2nd Christopher Bollyn interview
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, April 24 program. or Download 1st Christopher Bollyn interview
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, April 21 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Wednesday, April 20 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, April 19 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, April 18 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, April 17 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Friday, April 15 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, April 14 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Wednesday, April 13 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, April 12 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, April 11 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, April 10 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Friday, April 8 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Thurs, April 7 program. or Download (Jerusalem Post Attack on Ukrainian Patriots & David Duke)
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, April 5 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, April 4 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, April 4 program. or Download (the fight around the world)
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, April 3 program. or Download (5000 Russian Leaders standing against Jewish Supremacism!)
Rep. Duke’s Friday, April 1 program. or Download (focus on Israeli terrorism against America)
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, Mar. 31 program. or Download (Judaism’s version of the SS!)
Rep. Duke’s Wed., Mar. 30 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, Mar. 29 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, Mar. 28 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, Mar. 27 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Friday, Mar. 25 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, Mar. 24 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Wednesday, Mar. 23 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, Mar. 22 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, Mar. 21 program. or Download Shows with Pedro Varela in Barcelona, Spain
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, Mar. 20 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Friday, Mar. 18 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, Mar. 17 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Wednesday, Mar. 16 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, Mar. 15 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, Mar. 14 program. or Download with Juergen Graf, leading Revisionist historian.
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, Mar. 13 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, Mar. 10 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Wednesday, Mar. 9 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, Mar. 8 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, Mar. 7 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, Mar. 6 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, Mar. 3 program. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Wednesday, Mar. 2 here.or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, Mar. 1 (David Duke interviews Dr. Alexander Jacob) here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, Feb. 28 (David Duke Comments) webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, Feb. 27 webcast or Download
Rep. Duke’s Friday, Feb. 25 (O’Reilly Retort) webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, Feb. 24 (analysis of Putin) webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Wednesday, Feb. 23 webcast with Juergen Graf here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, Feb. 22 webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, Feb. 21 webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, Feb. 20 webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Friday, Feb. 18 webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, Feb. 17 webcast with Bob Twain here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tues. and Wed., Feb. 15-16 webcast with Bob Twain here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, Feb. 14 webcast with Bob Twain here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, Feb. 13 webcast with Bob Twain here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Friday, Feb. 11 webcast with Bob Twain here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, Feb. 10 webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Wednesday, Feb. 9 webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, Feb. 8 webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Monday, Feb. 7 webcast or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, Feb. 6 webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Friday, Feb. 4 webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Wed. & Thur. Feb. 2-3 webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, Feb. 1st webcast here. or Download

Rep. Duke’s Monday, Jan. 31th webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Sunday, Jan. 30th webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Friday, Jan. 28th webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Thursday, Jan. 27th webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Wednesday, Jan. 26th webcast here. or Download
Rep. Duke’s Tuesday, Jan. 25th webcast here. or Download

Live Show Connect HERE only during time of the show
POST QUESTIONS on Stormfront HERE

Jewish Extremists Succeed In Railroading 88-year-old John Demjanjuk

demjanjuk-1.jpgThe Demjanjuk Case: A Huge Failure of Justice

US to Deport Accused ‘Nazi Camp Guard’ John Demjanjuk

By James Buchanan EURO

In the first case against John Demjanjuk, it was claimed that he was a sadistic, murderous guard named “Ivan the Terrible.” He was extradited to Israel, spent five years in an Israeli prison and was sentenced to death. Congressman James Traficant and Pat Buchanan made it known there was conclusive evidence that the accused was not “Ivan the Terrible.” Demjanjuk was returned to the United States and many people thought that he would finally be left alone after being so horribly and wrongly persecuted for so long.

The organization prosecuting Demjanjuk is the Office of Special Investigations (OSI). They appear to prosecute only cases involving alleged Nazi war crimes while ignoring war criminals hiding in the US from Communist countries. The head of the OSI is Eli M. Rosenbaum.

Some people however were not happy about Demjanjuk escaping the original charges against him and embarrassing the people so eager to put him to death. Amazingly, a second round of persecution against John Demjanjuk was started claiming that he was a guard in a different camp. This time there wasn’t even a claim that he abused prisoners. The latest accusation was generated by the same branch of our judicial system, that came up with the completely false earlier charges.

(more…)