News From The West

‘Judeo-Christian’ Devil Pig McVety

2010-06-30T23:26:00.002-04:00

Mystery Worshipper is doing a great job, defending Canada and real Christians from the ‘Christian Zionists’.

Devil Pigs like Charles McVety pile fresh manure and corpses onto the Zionist-hatched War of Terror, blinding the naive while defending the Rothschild’s terrorist nest. He resembles the corpulent Falwell, so let’s hope the cholesterol does it’s work.

Die you scum, die die die!

(following article from MysteryWorshippers site)

MysteryWorshipers

Is Charles McVety a “spiritual Bernie Madoff”?

2010-06-30T23:17:00.001-04:00

June 22, 2010

Everyone remembers fake “investment advisor” Bernie Madoff who ripped off billions of dollars from his friends and said he’d do it again if he had the chance. But not everyone knows about “spiritual Madoffs” inside Christian circles.

Sure, we all know about the obvious “spiritual Madoff” scammers such as Israeli-born Benny Hinn. But do we know about the fakes in our own churches who can trick Christians for years? Two obvious fraud examples: Walid Shoebat and Ergun Caner, president of Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary. If these messianic maniacs can fool “evangelical” Christians for years, who is to say that there aren’t other Christian fakes lurking behind pulpits?

I come now to the Rev. Dr. Charles McVety, a not so humble man (watch him) I’d like to call Mr. McZion. My personal take is that Mr. McZion is a Zionist shill; in fact, he almost admits it. In any case, here are a few reasons why I’m highly suspicious of him (other than the fact he belongs to the Christian Zionist cult, the fastest growing cult in the world):

Mr. McZion’s Canada Christian College in 2004 awarded Bnai Brith Executive VP Frank Dimant an honourary PhD.
Mr. McZion “is the best known of Canada’s dispensationalists and the closest to B’nai Brith.”
Bnai Brith is a Masonic Scottish Rite Order, “instrumental in starting the Ku Klux Klan and causing the US Civil War, which destroyed the flower of American manhood. A B’nai B’rith leader, Simon Wolf, was a Confederate spy and was implicated in the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, the first of many such coup d’etats (i.e. the assassinations of Presidents Garfield, McKinley, Kennedy.)”
Frank Dimant is an Orthodox Jew who is “the follower of the rather secular Ze’ev Jabotinsky” a fierce fascist who declared that Zionism’s strength “stands or it falls by the question of armed force.”
Mr. McZion established a “Department of Israel Studies” at his Canada Christian College and names Jabotinsky follower Frank Dimant as the “inaugural chair” and professor “focusing on Israel and Zionist history.”
Mr. McZion is Canadian Director for CUFI, an extremist fundamentalist religious outfit that agrees with the Israeli military blockade of Gaza, the brutal bombardment of Gaza in 2008-2009, and the lethal IDF attack on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla.
Mr. McZion hired “Bnai Brith ‘point-man‘ (i.e. lobbyist)” Zionist Jew Joseph Ben-Ami “to work for two of the numerous front organizations established by Rev. McVety—the Canadian Centre for Policy Studies and the Institute for Canadian Values.”
Mr. McZion shouts very loudly on topics such as sex education, homosexuality, abortion, the economy, etc., but not a peep comes from his sacred lips about the Israeli massacres of the international humanitarian aid workers to Gaza.

I could go on and list other things that make me suspicious like Mr. McZion appearing in a news release of Likud Canada, and Mr. McZion inviting criminal Karl Rove to Canada. But that’s it for now.

Source: Ziofascism.net

An eternal curse on mankind?

2010-06-30T23:15:00.001-04:00

by Phaedrus

Hello, Gentiles everywhere and welcome to Phaedrus's new blog. I would just like to extend a particularly warm welcome to readers from Northern Europe, or readers of Northern European decent, wherever they may be, in our world-wide diaspora.

I was in two minds about blogging again. By the time October 2008 came around, I figured I had just about reached a final, fixed position on the causes of 90% the ills of this world and that there was really nothing more I could say. My position today remains as totally rock solid now as it did back then. However, I will restate it here now, for the benefit of new readers, or for anyone who didn't quite get the message last time around.

In essence, a way must be found to deal with the Jewish Problem. I personally don't know how to formulate a suitable mechanism for achieving this objective; I can only state what the objective is and that it is imperative that it be somehow brought about. Greater minds than mine will have to come up with an approach that will bring about this solution for an infinitely better and more peaceful world. What is the objective? It has to be a global one and It is quite simply expressed in these 3 Golden Rules I lay before you now:

1. There must be no place in public life for the Jew in any country around the world. The Jews must be removed from all positions of public influence. This means there must be no Jews in politics, no Jews in the media, none in the judiciary, none in lobbying groups, none in public corporations, none in genetic research, none in communications, none in advertising and none in banking and finance. This list is not intended to be exhaustive and it is expected that its scope will need to be extended in future as new and novel technologies and situations arise.

2. Jews must never be allowed to exercise influence in any of these areas through the use of Gentile proxies. Gentiles who have allowed themselves to become tools of the Jews will need to be dealt with severely as a warning to others that such liaisons are totally unacceptable and will not be tolerated in any form.

3. A way must be found to ensure that this state of affairs is set in stone for all time. The mechanism must be 100% resistant to even the slightest compromise over time. We must be able to heave a giant, collective sigh of relief in the sure and certain knowledge that this age-old curse on mankind has been consigned to history for ever.

Note that in the construction of this protective mechanism, we must be able to look ahead and ask ourselves one key question: "is there a possibility that, in say 1,000 years from now, this measure we are considering could have become compromised with the result that the Jews are yet again evading containment and rising once more to positions of power and influence over us?" If, after due consideration, the answer should turn out to be "yes" or "maybe" then the measure duly fails. It must be discarded or modified until such time as a fresh or revised proposal arises which, when subjected to the same test, gives rise to the unequivocal answer: "no, not a chance; never."

If our forefathers had applied such test when formulating documents such as the Constitution and Bill of Rights, it my belief we would not be in the perilous position we yet again find ourselves today.

Why is it so vital for us to devote so much time and effort to the Jewish Problem? Well in essence, there is something unique in this particular race of entities that is totally poisonous to free and well-ordered societies - and always has been since the dawn of recorded history. I cannot ascribe any one particular contributory factor which might account for this. Maybe it's a heritable trait passed on genetically; maybe it's cultural - or perhaps Talmudic. Maybe it is a combination of all three. It would be interesting to know, but of academic value only. In fact such explorations should be heavily deprecated, since they can easily be exploited by the Jews to their own advantage. When in doubt, always refer to the foregoing Golden Rules, wherein the only real protection for ourselves, our children and our children's children's children can ever truly lie.

Source: The Voice of Phaedrus

Zionist Rulers of Saudi Arabia

2010-06-30T22:57:00.001-04:00

Jewish Roots of the Saudi Ruling Family

Translated from Arabic

RESEARCH AND PRESENTATION OF MOHAMMAD SAKHER who was ordered killed by the Saudi Regime for the following findings:

1. Are the Saudi Family members belonging to the Tribe of ANZA BEN WA’EL as they allege to be?
2. Is Islam their actual religion?
3. Are they of an ARAB ORIGIN at all?

THE SAUDI DYNASTY: IT’S ORIGIN AND WHO IS THE REAL ANCESTOR OF THIS ‘ROYAL’ FAMILY?

Abd ul Aziz

In the year 851 A.H. a group of men from AL MASALEEKH CLAN, which was a branch of ANZA Tribe, formed a caravan for buying cereals (wheat and corn) and other food stuff from IRAQ, and transporting it back to NAJD. The head of that group was a man called SAHMI BIN HATHLOOL. The caravan reached BASRA, where the members of the group went to a cereal merchant who was a Jew, Called MORDAKHAI BIN IBRAHIM BIN MOSHE’.

During their bargaining with that merchant, the Jew asked them : “Where are you from?” They answered: “From ANZA TRIBE; a clan of AL MASALEEKH.” Upon hearing that name, the Jew started to hug so affectionately each one of them saying that he, himself, was also from the clan of AL MASALEEKH, but he had come to reside in BASRA (IRAQ) in consequence to a family feud between his father and some members of ANZA Tribe.

After he recounted to them his fabricated narrative, he ordered his servants to load all the camels of the clan’s members with wheat, dates and tamman; a remarkable deed so generous that astonished the MASALEEKH men and aroused their pride to find such an affectionate (cousin) in IRAQ- the source of their sustenance; they believed each word he said , and , because he was a rich merchant of the food commodities which they were badly in need, they liked him (even though he was a Jew concealed under the garb of an Arab from AL MASALEEKH clan).

When the caravan was ready to depart returning to NAJD, that Jewish Merchant asked them to accept his company, because he intended to go with them to his original homeland, NAJD. Upon hearing that from him, they wholeheartedly welcomed him with a very cheerful attitude.

So that (concealed) Jew reached NAJD with the caravan. In NAJD, he started to promulgate a lot of propaganda for himself through his companions (his alleged cousins), a fact, which gathered around him a considerable number of new supporters; but, unexpectedly, he confronted a campaign of opposition to his views led by SHEIKH SALEH SALMAN ABDULLA AL TAMIMI, who was a Muslim religious preacher in AL-QASEEM. The radius of his preaching area included Najd, Yemen, and Hijaz, a fact which compelled the Jew (the Ancestor of the present SAUDI FAMILY to depart from AL QASEEM to AL IHSA, where he changed his name (MORDAKHAI) To MARKHAN BIN IBRAHIM MUSA. Then he changed the location of his residence and settled at a place called DIR’IYA near AL-QATEEF, where he started to spread among the inhabitants a fabricated story about the shield of our Prophet MOHAMMAD (p.b.u.h), that it was taken as a booty by an Arab Pagan in consequence of OHOD Battle between the Arab pagans and the Muslems. “That shield, he said, was sold by the Arab Pagan to a Jewish Clan called BANU QUNAIQA’ who preserved it as a treasure!

He gradually enhanced his position among the Bedouins through such stories which indicated how the Jewish clans in Arabia were so influential and deserved high esteem. He gained some personal importance among the Bedouins, and decided to settle permanently there, at DIR’IYA town, near AL QATEEF, which he decided to be his (Capital) on the Persian Gulf. He aspired to make it his spring board for establishing a Jewish Kingdom in Arabia.

In order to fulfill his ambitious scheme, he started to approach the desert Arab Bedouins for support of his position, them gradually, he declared himself as their king!

At that juncture, AJAMAN Tribe together with BANU KHALED Tribe became fully aware of that Jewish cunning plan after they had verified his true identity, and decided to put an end to him. They attacked his town and conquered it, but before arresting him he had escaped by the skin of his teeth.

That Jewish Ancestor of the SAUDI FAMILY, (MORDAKHAI), sought shelter in a farm called at that time AL-MALIBEED-GHUSAIBA near AL-ARID, which is called at our present time : AL-RIYADH.

He requested the owner of that farm to grant him an asylum. The farmer was so hospitable that he immediately gave him sanctuary. But that Jew (MORDAKHAI), no longer than a month had he stayed there, when he assassinated the land lord and all members of his family, pretending that all were killed by an invading band of thieves. Then he pretended that he had bought that real estate from them before that catastrophe happened to them! Accordingly, he had the right to reside there as a land lord. He then gave a new name to that place: He named it AL-DIRIYA – the same name as that he had lost.

That Jewish Ancestor of the SAUDI FAMILY (MORDAKHAI), was quick to establish a “GUEST HOUSE” called “MADAFFA” on the land he usurped from his victims, and gathered around him a group of hypocrites who started to spread out false propaganda for him that he was a prominent Arab Sheikh. He plotted against Sheikh SALEH SALMAN ABDULLA AL TAMIMI, his original enemy, and caused his assassination in the mosque of the town called (AL-ZALAFI).

After that, he felt satisfied and safe to make (AL-DIRIYA) his permanent home. There he practiced polygamy at a wide scale, and indeed, he begot a lot of children whom he gave pure Arab names.

Eversince his descendants grew up in number and power under the name of SAUDI CLAN, they have followed his steps in practicing under ground activities and conspiracies against the Arab Nation. They illegally seized rural sectors and farm lands, and assassinated every person who tried to oppose their evil plans. They used all kinds of deceit for reaching their goals: they bought the conscience of their dissidents; they offered their women and money to influential people in that area, particularly to those who started to write the true biography of that Jewish Family; they bribed writers of history in order to purify their ignominious history, and make their lineage related to the most prominent Arab Tribes such as RABI’A, ANZA and ALMASALEEKH.

A conspicuous hypocrite in our era whose name is MOHAMMAD AMIN AL TAMIMI- Director/Manager of the contemporary Libraries of the SAUDI KINGDOM, made up a genealogical tree (FAMILY TREE) for this JEWISH FAMILY (THE SAUDIS), connecting them to our Great Prophet, MOHAMMAD (P.B.U.H) For his false work, he received a reward of 35 (THIRTY FIVE) THOUSAND EYPTIAN POUNDS from the then SAUDI AMBASSADOR TO CAIRO, EGYPT, in the year 1362 AH.- 1943 A.D. The name of that Ambassador is : IBRAHIM AL-FADEL.

As aforementioned, the Jewish Ancestor of the SAUDI FAMILY, (MORDAKHAI), practiced polygamy by marrying a lot of Arab women and begot many children; his polygamous practice is, at the present time, being carried out ” to the letter” by his descendants; they cling to his marital heritage!

One of MORDAKHAI’S sons called AL-MAQARAN, arabized from the Jewish root (MACK-REN) begot a son called Mohammad, then another son called SAUD, which is the name of the present day SAUDI DYNASTY.

Descendants of SAUD (the present day SAUDI FAMILY )started a campaign of assassination of the prominent leaders of the Arab Tribes under the pretence that those leaders were apostates; renegading from the Islamic Religion, and deserting their Koranic doctrines; so they deserved the SAUDI condemnation and slaughter!

In the History Book of the SAUDI FAMILY pages (98-101), their private family historian declares that the SAUDI DYNASTY considers all the people of NAJD blasphemous; so their blood must be shed, their properties confiscated, and their females be taken as concubines; no muslem is authentic in his /her belief unless he/she belongs (affiliates) to the sect of MOHAMMAD BIN ABDUL WAHAB, (whose origins are also Jewish from TURKEY.) His doctrines give authority to the SAUDI FAMILY to destroy the villages with all their inhabitants-males including children, and to sexually assault their women; stab the bellies of the pregnant, and cut off the hands of their children, then burn them! They are further authorized by such a BRUTAL DOCTRINE to plunder all the properties of whom they call renegades (not following their Wahabi Sect).
Their hideous Jewish Family has, in fact, done all that kind of atrocities in the name of their false religious sect (the Wahabi), which has actually been invented by a Jew so as to sow the seeds of terror in the hearts of people in towns and villages. This Jewish Dynasty has been committing such brutal atrocities eversince 1163 A.H. They have named the whole Arabian Peninsula after their family name (SAUDI ARABIA) as if the whole region is their own personal real estate, and that all other inhabitants are their mere servants or slaves, toiling day and night for the pleasure of their masters (THE SAUDI FAMILY).

They are completely holding the natural wealth of the country as their own property. If any poor person from the common people raises his/her voice complaining against any of the despotic rules of this Jewish Dynasty, (the Dynasty) cuts off his/her head in the public square. A princess of theirs once visited FLORIDA, USA, with her retinue; she rented 90 (NINETY) Suite rooms in a Grand Hotel for about One Million Dollars a night! Can anyone of their subjects comment about that extravagant event If he/she does, his/her fate is quite known: DEATH WITH THE EDGE OF THE SAUDI SWORD IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE!!!!!!

Witnesses on the Jewish Ancestry of this Saudi Family: In the 1960′s the “SAWT AL ARAB” Broadcasting Station in Cairo, Egypt, and the YEMEN Broadcasting Station in SANA’A confirmed the Jewish Ancestry of the SAUDI Family.

King FAISAL AL-SAUD at that time could not deny his family’s kindred with the JEWS when he declared to the WASHINGTON POST on Sept. 17, 1969 stating: “WE, THE SAUDI FAMILY, are cousins of the Jews: we entirely disagree with any Arab or Muslem Authority which shows any antagonism to the Jews; but we must live together with them in peace. Our country (ARABIA) is the Fountain head from where the first Jew sprang, and his descendants spread out all over the world.” That was the declaration of KING FAISAL AL-SAUD BIN ABDUL AZIZ!!!!!

HAFEZ WAHBI, The SAUDI Legal Adviser, mentioned in his book entitled: “THE PENINSULA OF ARABIA” that KING ABDUL AZIZ AL-SAUD, who died in 1953, had said : “Our Message (SAUDI MESSAGE) encountered the opposition of all Arab Tribes; my grandfather, SAUD AWAL, once imprisoned a number of the Sheikhs of MATHEER Tribe; and when another group of the same tribe came to intercede for the release of the prisoners, SAUD AWAL gave orders to his men to cut off the heads of all the prisoners, then, he wanted to humiliate and derogate the interceders by inviting them to eat from a banquet he prepared from the cooked flesh of his victims whose cut off heads he placed on the top of the food platters!! The interceders became so alarmed and declined to eat the flesh of their relatives; and, because of their refusal to eat, he ordered his men to cut off their heads too. That hideous crime was committed by that self imposed king to innocent people whose guilt was their opposition to his most cruel and extremely despotic rules.

HAFEZ WAHBI, states further that King ABDUL AZIZ AL-SAUD related that bloody true story to the Sheikhs of the MATHEER Tribe, who visited him in order to intercede for their prominent leader at that time, FAISAL AL DARWEESH, who was the king’s prisoner. He related that story to them in order to prevent them from interceding for the release of their Sheikh; otherwise, they would face the same fate; He killed the Sheikh and used his blood as an ablution liquid for him just before he stood up for his prayer (after the false sect doctrine of the Wahabi); The guilt of FAISAL DARWEESH at that time was that he had criticized King ABDUL AZIZ AL-SAUD when the king signed the document which the English Authorities prepared in 1922 as a declaration for giving PALESTINE to the Jews; his signature was obtained in the conference held at AL AQEER in 1922.

That was and still is the system of this Regime of the JEWISH FAMILY (SAUDI FAMILY): All its goals are : plundering the wealth of the country, robbing, falsifying, and committing all kinds of atrocity, iniquity, and blasphemy-all are executed in compliance with their self invented Wahabi Sect which legalizes the chopping of the heads of their opposing subjects.

Brief synopsis about the leading Saudi figures

King Abdel Aziz:
also known as Ibn Saud. King Abdul Aziz is the father of King Fahd and 44 other sons. Abdul Aziz united Saudi Arabia with the sword. A savage bedouin whose self gratification, war after war, was to taste the blood of those he killed. During the early twentieth century, he offered his services to the Ottoman empire and was rejected by the Turks as unreliable and uncivilized. The British, during the same period, were looking to increase their sphere of influence in Arabia, and saw in Ibn Saud the unruly, savage warrior they were looking for to control Arabia for them. They financed him and protected him to deliver Arabia to them. Among the many of the ruling families during that period : The Hashemites (King Hussein of Jordan), the Rasheeds (trading respected family from Saudi Arabia) and the Idrisses were all unwilling to deal with the British empire after World War I on the British terms. The British found in Abdul Aziz a willing bandit they could rely on to conquer and preserve their interests. Since Abdul Aziz was a Wahhabi, he encouraged Fundamentalism to create fear in the various tribes he was trying to unite. Little did he and King Fahd after him know that fundamentalism has grown to become more than a politically oriented idealogy but a way of life.

King Fahd bin Abdel Aziz:
The corrupt members of Al-Saud Family are many. It is not easy to assemble facts on all of them with total accuracy, however, the most corrupt of them all and master of all masters is none other than the King himself. King Fahd bin Abdul Aziz. Absolute power over Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the Saudi government. He is the judge, jury, prosecutor, defense attorney, and executioner. Having total power, he has, with other members of his family, emptied the coffers of the government. Today, Saudi Arabia is bankrupt and has a very grim economic future because of his policies and lack of vision.
More about this king and his dark history of corruption and waste in future articles to come…

Prince Sultan bin Abdel Aziz:
Third in command of the country but no less corrupt than King Fahd is Sultan bin Abdul Aziz who has four titles all with the intent to retain power and to rob the country. He is the Deputy Crown Prince, Minister of Defense, Chairman of Saudia Airlines, and the Inspector General of the country of Saudi Arabia. Imagine being the fox watching over the chicken hen !! Minister of Defense and Inspector General. This is like having the head of the largest chemical company head also the Environmental Protection Agency. What a joke. Sultan is known for his sexual deviation including penophily. He maintains several bordellos for his own pleasures in Saudi Arabia and abroad.

Prince Muhammed bin Fahd:
Eldest son of King Fahd, Mohammad bin Fahd was exposed to corruption early on. With the blessings of his father, Mohammad has stolen government funds through large telecommunications projects. Telephone deals, cellular deals, equipment, etc… His wealth is valued at close to $5 billion mostly amassed during the heydays of the late seventies and early eighties. His father assigned a government post after he pilfered through business deals. Today, he is the governor of the Eastern Province in Saudi Arabia where 25% of the oil world reserves lie. His father wants him to become the Crown Prince and Bandar bin Sultan the new Defense Minister.

Prince Faisal bin Fahd:
If a classroom had to write a thesis on al-Saud Family, Faisal bin Fahd would win the award for the imbecile of the family. Stupidly stubborn and unmistakably foolish, Faisal has spent his life in pursuit of two things : drugs and women. He gets his drugs from Lebanon through his business associates and his women from Europe following the same trail of contacts. This is a man who has never done anything right, good, or useful in his life. His father, King Fahd, appointed him as the head of all youth sports programs. One must be sick to appoint a well known drug addict to be head of all youth programs. This is like hiring a child molester as your Kindergarten teacher.

Prince Abdel Aziz bin Fahd:
The youngest son of King Fahd, Abdul Aziz is a 24 year old child who is the most protected child on earth. Born to an astute mother, King Fahd was duped into believing that if he took his son everywhere, he will never be assassinated (like King Faisal). So Abdul Aziz was born with a golden spoon in his mouth. This is a kid who is so spoiled and so protected that he has never known pain, physical, moral or emotional. People that are close to him say that he is unremarkable and vain. When his father had a heart attack in November of 1995, he bequested him $10 billion of his personal fortune. The money was transferred to Abdul Aziz accounts at Credit Suisse and Union de Banques Suisses in Geneva and Zurich with the help of Khaled al-Ibrahim, his uncle.

Prince Bandar bin Sultan:
The most ignorant and dangerous of the newcomers to the scene of politics. Bandar is the unofficial son of Sultan (See the full story below). For those who do not know him, Bandar is a murderer (he financed and approved the planting of a bomb in Beirut that killed 80 innocent women and children), a liar (Washington and his fellow Ambassadors know him well), a thief (ask Mrrs. Saeed Karma and Wafic Saeed in London), and a back stabber all in one. He also happens to be the Ambassador of Saudi Arabia to the United States since 1984, a side job considering that he spends his time plotting and stealing. His friends are few and his enemies are many. His dream is to return to power in Saudi Arabia jumping over Princes Naef and Salman. His uncle King Fahd is helping him achieve that goal. Once King Fahd dies, Bandar will lose all his powers. Bandar despises anyone who has more money than he does or is more respected than he is, mainly Prince Saud bin Faisal, Minister of Foreign Affairs who is highly respected, Prince Mohammad bin Fahd who is richer than he is, and lately Prince Walid bin Talal, the businessman wiz who has, unlike any of the al-Saud House members, made money rather than steal it.

Prince Khalid bin Sultan:
If one had to describe this big ugly huggable bear, the best description will have to be the quote provided anonymousely by General Schwarzkopf staff during the Gulf war : “When it comes to military knowhow, he gets a C minus.When it comes to bravery, he gets a D. When it comes to intelligence, he gets a D minus. Other than that, he is OK”. This is the man who provided water and food to the Desert Storm troops through a contractual agreement with the government of Saudi Arabia. This contract alone made him $2 billion in commissions. After the war, he claimed that he was behind the victory of Desert Storm. Needless to say that he has been exiled to London where he has written a self-promoting book that exuded his intelligence and understanding of military operations. Even Prince Sultan wishes he never had that son. Today, he spends his time trying to impress Europeans and Americans alike through social activities. He is totally ignored except for those who benefit directly and indirectly from the crums of his money.

Prince Naef bin Abdel Aziz:
Minister of Interior and head of internal security, he is known for his cowardice. During the Mecca uprising by Jumaiha al-Otaibi, Naef fleed the Ministry to hide underground. It took a long time for him to recover. Naef oversees a large budget of which 40% a year goes to pay for bribes, kickbacks, and fixed contracts for himself and his sons. His weakness helped extremist elements in Saudi Arabia plant a bomb in Riyadh that killed five Americans. He spends most of his time overlooking a bloated bureaucracy that blocks his vision when it comes to the security of the country. His incompetency is never questioned as he is another Sudeiri. His younger brother Salman has made it clear that he will jump Naef to the throne when the right time comes.

Prince Saud bin Naef:
is the son of the Interior Minister. Here we have the typical son of a Sudeiri who steels from the government and then looses it all through rsiky businesses and pure stupidty. In fact, he is so financially overstretched that he is unable to maintain payments and obligations which means very little for him since he does not admit any obligations or knowledge of debts. A typical true business deal for Saud bin Naef is when he invested millions to build car inspection stations all over Saudi Arabia. After he built them, he went to his father seeking a royal decree that all 5 million plus cars in Saudi Arabia must be inspected annually by a certified inspection station. And the company that got immediate certification is none other than the one he put together prior to the decree. Saud bin Naef is a small government within a government charging people hundreds of Riyals a year to have their car inspected and then loosing it all somewhere else. How did the government of Saudi Arabia go bankrupt ?

Prince Salman bin Abdel Aziz:
As Governor of Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia, Salman bin Abdul Aziz wears many hats. He is the strongman of Saudi Arabia and heading fast to the throne. In the last year, Salman has met with major Jewish organizations in the US to dispel the rumors that he is anti-semitic and supports Israel in its push for peace. His message was met with skeptisism according to people who have arranged the meetings to take place. Salman is as corrupt as any of his brothers and has amassed his fortunes by appropriating vast lands from the government and then selling it back to the government for whatever he needed to cover the expensive lifestyle he maintains. Salman has been instrumental in advising Fahd on procedural issues regarding the future of the seven brothers in light of Prince Abdullah taking over the throne upon the imminent death of King Fahd. But lately, King Fahd has been ignoring him totally by advancing his son Mohammad and Bandar bin Sultan to the throne.

Mohammad bin Fahd Bin Abdel AzizFifty-year-old Prince Mohammad is the second son of King Fahd. He is the governor of the oil-rich eastern province, the most visible of his brothers and a secret pretender to the Saudi throne. Simultaneously, he has been involved in more shady business pay-offs at home, moral and business scandals abroad and political negligence than the younger princes of his generation.

Mohammad’s qualifications are vague; a high school degree from California. His ascendancy over his older brother Faisal owes more to the latter’s lack of character than to Mohammad’s talents. Faisal has been disqualified from fatherly attention for indulging in drink and drugs and the writer Peler Theroux (Sandstorm) has accused him to murdering his male lover. Mohammad stepped into the number one spot by default. Pay-offs at home take place through Mohammad’s Al Bilad and United Arab Helicopter companies, but Mohammad’s business interests were never limited to them. In fact, as we will see, companies were created to deal with huge individual contracts and dissolved after the illegal deal was concluded.

The biggest scandal conducted under the cover of a company of convenience was exposed by the Guardian and Wall Street Journal newspapers in November 1980. A Japanese company called Petrmonde was buying 140.000 barrels of oil a day from ARAMCO at $32 a berrel. However, close examination revealed the following: the company was paying $34.63 a barrel and the differential amounted to $368.000 a day ($135 million a year), the company was not Japanese but London-based and headquartered at the Al Bilad offices and the difference in price was pocketed by Mohammad. Occurring as it did during the Iran-Iraq War, a period of tight oil supplies, the deal infuriated the American oil companies which put pressure on ARAMCO and brought the arrangement to an end. But Mohammad walked away wealthier and though Petromonde disappeared.

A second deal involving Mohammad and Saudi Telecom was an open contract but no less horrific in its scale of corruption. In 1979 international firms were invited to undertake the tripling of the number of Saudi telephone lines from 200.000 to 600.000. The project was so huge, some of the companies transported their offers in pick up trucks, and the value was estimated at somewhere between 6 and 10 billion dollars. The contract was won by a consortium of Philips of Holland, Bell of Canada and Sweden’s Erikson and the agent was the Mohammad-owned and operated Al Bilad company. Other contenders for the contract, ITT, Western Electric, Thompson of France and Hitachi, smelt a rat and demanded an investigation. They claimed that their offers were lower and better than those of the winning consortium and tried to reach Mohammad to lodge a protest, but he was not available.

Nor were King Khalid and crown Prince Fahd available to receive American Ambassador William Porter who too tried to protest on behalf of his county’s multinationals. Eventually the noise died down, estimates of the Mohammad-Al Bilad commission run as high as 20 per cent or $1.3 billion of the $6.7 billion winning tender. To this day, the maintenance contract for this project, because other contractors have disqualified themselves knowing that they can’t win, is with Mohammad and its carries a hefty commission much greater than is acceptable in normal circumstances.

Mohammad’s colossal home contracts didn’t stop him from misbehaving abroad. Among others, he had established connections with British MP and one time Under Secretary of Defence Jonathan Aitken. The British politician appears to have used Mohammed’s Al Bilad London offices free of charge and there have been allegations, so far unrefuted, that Mohammad and Aitken have conspired to sell arms to Singapore which eventually found their way to Iran at a time when such sales were prohibited.

Moreover, in 1981, the News of The World newspaper reported an incident involving Mohammad and a London girl for hire. His Highness appears to have roughed up the girl and escaped to America after she threatened disclosure. This aspect of Mohammad’s character is reported to have more to it and a recent television programme has accused Aitken of procuring for Royals and implied that Mohammad was involved.

Most recently, during the Gulf War, Mohammad was accused of realizing hundreds of millions of dollars in profit from housing and feeding American troops sent to Saudi Arabia to protect it against Saddam Hussein. Housing these troops meant building temporary accommodations on public land confiscated by Mohammad specifically for that purpose. Feeding them, ordinarily a simple operation, found some of Mohammad’s open or de facto companies charging exorbitant rates to provide them with everyday provision. It is estimated that Mohammad’s profits out of this were $28 per soldier, per day, If the number of soldiers was 500.000 then it adds up per diem $14.000.000. If Mohammad’s business deals make corrupt financial sense then his political qualifications are totally absent. His first appointment to an official position was as assistant to the Minister of Interior, and there is very little to report about that. Later, in 1985, he was appointed Deputy Governor of the Eastern Province and once again it is impossible to judge a performance by its non-existence. Yet later, in 1989, he was appointed to the important post of governor of the same province.

Perhaps the best way to judge his governance is to review his action in 1995. He spent five months away from his post, in Arizona in the United States with his ailing mother. During that period nothing was done, no one dared make any decisions because everything is in Mohammad’s hands. Upon his return, he was confronted with the problem of what to do to implement promises made to the Shias of this province in return for making peace with the house of Saud.

The Situations in the Eastern Province continues to deteriorate, Mohammad shows no interest in the affairs of the state, his business activities continue unabated despite the overall reduction in the oil income of the country and his personal behavior is as abominable as ever. Yet, this is the star among Fahd’s sons, the one his father is thinking of making King, supposedly the symbol of a new generation to replace the old discredited one.

Nayef bin Abd-al-Aziz 63 years old, Minister of the Interior. Since taking over the Ministry of Interior in 1975, Prince Nayef has been subjected to national and international attention owing to occurrences of repression and scandals. More recently he has been in the limelight for his heavy-handed clampdown against the alleged authors of the two anti-American bombings which took place in November 1995 in Riyadh and June 1996 in al-Khubar. Unfortunately, his harsh repressive stance has been closely linked to corruption and murky dealings, like most of the members of the House of Saud. Yet, initially the man was not, to use an understatement, as irresponsible as he is today. Who is Nayef bin Abd-al-Aziz? Born in 1933, Nayef is the third son of Hussa bint Ahmad al-Sudeiri, one of the seven Sudeiri brothers. He obtained his first degree in the Kingdom, but is not particularly bright intellectually, nor is he considered to be well educated. However, an honorary doctorate was conferred upon him by South Korea in 1979.

Good man turned evil:
Nayef is one of those strange human beings that mankind has known throughout the centuries. He was a calm man, who always avoided making hasty decisions in matters which committed the reputation of his ministry and himself. He used to comport himself with good manners and deference, earning himself respect and consideration amongst important personalities in society, amongst politicians and even diplomats. He maintained particularly good relations with the ulama and the religious institutions. But one day, in 1991, there was a certain Gulf War and the man turned evil almost overnight. He is known to have spoken in a way which does not befit an ordinary man, let alone his office as Minister of the Interior.

The appointment and promotion:
In 1951 he was given his first ever appointment as Deputy Governor of Riyadh from which he became Governor in 1953 only to cede it to Prince Fawaz a year later. From then on he did not assume any responsibility in public service until 1971 when his elder brother (Interior Minister Fahd) appointed him as his Deputy. Four years later, after the assassination of King Faisal in 1975, he eventually became Interior Minister himself. Twenty one years later, he is still head of this ministry and his record is indeed impressive.

Sudeiris tighten grip on power:
The Sudeiris reached the highest positions of the State when Faisal took over as King in 1962. Fahd was given the Interior, Sultan the Defence and Salman the Governorate of Riyadh. The appointment of Nayef as Deputy Interior Minister in 1971 was seen as a move which reinforced the grip of the Sudeiris on the State machinery. When he took full charge of the Ministry in 1975, Nayef, in turn, appointed his younger brother Ahmad as his deputy with whom he has since planned and executed the ministry’s policies.

Importance of the Interior Ministry:
As Interior Minister, Nayef was granted important prerogatives following the demise of King Faisal. These were to gradually increase year by year, thereby emphasising the importance of the Interior Ministry in the strategy of the House of Saud of holding onto power.

The Interior Ministry has usually been seen as the bridge to the supreme office, as the cases of King Faisal and King Fahd demonstrate. Since its inception, the post has respectively been held by Prince Faisal before he became King, Musa id bin Abd-al-Rahman Al-Saud, Abd-al-Muhsin bin Abd-al-Aziz, Faisal bin Turki bin Abd-al-Aziz, Fahd and finally Nayef. Moreover, a great many lesser princes have been employed by the ministry throughout the Arabian provinces and emirates, which indicate yet again the extent of the House of Saud’s grip on the country. The Interior Ministry’s importance comes from the fact that it controls the policing of the population through the security services; the borders and coasts through the Borders and Coast Guards and the tribes through the so-called Mujahidin Forces. Under Nayef, and among its prominent services are the Special Police Forces, who have became notorious of late and the Anti-terrorist Squad.

One of the features of Nayef’s authority, is that all civilian services within the country’s provinces report directly to his ministry even if they are attached to other ministries. This is another strategic method by which the House of Saud foils possible unrest and uncovers any activity deemed suspicious. This prerogative has enabled Nayef to infringe upon the authority of the Minister of Justice as Nayef is able to control the proceedings of scores of courts, especially those dealing with political activity.

Another aspect of Nayef s prerogatives is his overall control of the media. The Supreme Information Council, set up in 1977, paradoxically comes under his authority instead of that of the Ministry of Information, which once more underlines the repressive character of the regime. Even the Foreign Ministry’s Information Department was integrated into this council which has become the initiator of both internal and external information policy. In the wake of the 1979 revolt inside the Sacred Mosque in Makka, Prince Nayef was given unlimited power over the audio-visual and written press. Under the notorious March 1980 Decree no. 78, Nayef appointed a representative of his Ministry to monitor the activities of newsmen whom he forced to practice self-censorship.

In the field of human rights Nayef has always ignored the requests of human rights organizations regarding the rights of political prisoners for fair trials, and has even undertaken media campaigns against them in an attempt to belittle their importance. In the recent trials of defendants charged in connection with the Riyadh and al-Khobar anti-American bombings, Nayef himself oversaw the proceedings and is reported to have personally interrogated the accused, while circulating rumours that they were ShiÕa dissidents rather than an armed opposition to the Saud oligarchy. As a prince belonging to the family of King Abd-al-Aziz, Nayef is annually entitled to a remuneration of $100 million.

He also has a quota of oil which accounts for hundreds of millions of dollars, in addition to a quota of royal lands which he resells. He is also known to have confiscated land for his own benefit claiming that it was for security reasons. Meanwhile he is rumoured to be involved in the sale of drugs and alcohol for which he receives a commission.

In the meantime, one of his wives, Maha Sudeiri, is known to dominate him and actually makes decisions in his place at the Interior Ministry, which has led to persistent abuses of power. The victims are the ordinary people. Also, her misbehaviour abroad was such that an American television stations in Florida broadcast a film about her. Her attitude caused great embarrassment to the House of Saud who kept urging Nayef to divorce her, but in vain.

As the fourth key personality of the regime (after the King, the Heir Apparent and the Defence Minister), Nayef has an eye on the highest office, but so has his elder brother, Sultan and younger brother, Salman. This situation has created a rift between the Sudeiris, although this has so far been kept under control. But for how long? And would this diminish Crown Prince Abdallah’s chances of succeeding the ailing King Fahd?

Sultan bin Abdel AzizSULTAN, the Defence Minister and son of King Abdul Aziz, was born in 1924. He is one the Sudeiri Seven, the full brothers of King Fahd. He is second in line to the Saudi throne.

Ambitions of a would-be Dictator:
Sultan rose to fame when he was appointed Governor of Riyadh, the capital city. But he became more powerful when he was appointed Defence Minister in 1964, a post which he still holds. Worse than this, within the Sudeiri family’s relentless endeavour to secure monopoly of power, Sultan gradually acquired many other important posts in addition to the defence ministry. He is now the Deputy chairman of the Council of Ministers, the Government’s General Inspector, Head of the Higher Education Council, Head of the Higher Council for Islamic Affairs and, last but not least, Head of the Higher Labour Council. These were only his most important responsibilities.

Sultan has nurtured his ambition to succeed King Fahd and this ambition has become even more apparent since Fahd’s health has degenerated irremediably over the last year. But his half-brother, heir apparent Prince Abdullah, is next to succeed King Fahd under Saudi succession law which reserves the right to succession to the most senior prince. The fact that the dejure successor is Crown Prince Abdullah, is for Sultan and his six Sudeiri brothers, a great obstacle.

Low IQ blamed for violent behaviour:
Sultan is known for his manichean classification of people as masters and slaves. The best example is his long-standing, irrational determination to disown his own son Bandar, son of a slave woman, for fear that he might become a slave. He refrained from doing so only after King Faisal’s intervention. But fate decreed that Bandar became an educated person, and is the Kingdom’s Ambassador to Washington, while Sultan’s other sons have inherited their father’s undesirable traits. His class mentality expresses itself in his attitude towards the respected men of the nation and its scholars on whom he bestows derogatory nicknames.

Among the members of the House of Saud, Sultan shines with ignorance. He had little formal education and acquired his present fame only on account of his family name. Those who know him testify that his knowledge and experience does not exceed the fields of repression, wealth plundering and moral perversion. Despite his oratory style he is known to make regular blunders in speeches. For example, when addressing the inhabitants of Jizan (a part of the Kingdom) he began by conveying to them the regards of the people of Arabia, a statement that made him the laughing-stock of the whole country.

Such behaviour stems from his inferiority complex which partly explains why he is the most zealous opponent of education. But at another level, Sultan believes that educating people paves the way for awareness and thus the questioning of the House of Saud’s dictatorship. In the past he took a strong stand against educational development projects. When the Islamic reformist movement inaugurated its period of political questioning in the nineties, through the scholars memoranda for reform, Sultan felt a malicious pleasure to tell his ruling brothers you did this yourselves when you allowed them to get educated.

The man is not renowned for his capability to deal with problems using hindsight, calmness, wisdom, argument and dialogue worthy of any respectful political leader. Lacking all of these qualities has given him an inferiority complex which impels him to resort to force and violence in order to deal with any political opposition.

A threat to the Kingdom:
The 1994 clampdown against reformist scholars took place too late as far as he was concerned. If it had been up to him, and if King Fahd had not feared social unrest, he would have led the crackdown years earlier. In any case, reliable sources within the regime told MIRA that Sultan was the one urging the Sudeiris which led the last two years campaigns against the reformist opposition; he is reported to have personally signed the arrest warrant against Sheikh Safar al-Hawali and Salman al-Awdah. He is also said to have taken steps with the judicial authorities to obtain a series of immediate executions against the Muslim reformists and only backed down after being advised of the untold social unrest that such executions would entail.

His violent attitude and disrespect is unwisely directed even at people whose loyalty is important to him. He is known to be deeply unpopular in the armed forces that he heads. On the advice of foreign powers, he retires officers early and rotates them frequently for security reasons. Meanwhile, he is known to be very abusive to the high-ranking officers he commands and to whom he is supposed to be a role model. In this respect he does not refrain from insulting, hitting and spitting at officers in front of their colleagues. He reportedly humiliated them this way even in the presence of foreign delegations just as a master would do with his slaves.

Psychologists would surely find Sultan very interesting. He has married many times and into different tribes. He allegedly does not even know how many children he has. Dangerous claims have been said about his personal life. Indeed, it has come to the knowledge of the opposition (and unfortunately interested parties outside the Kingdom) that Sultan may have something to hide. Furthermore, according to reports, his psychological condition has been blamed for dubious decisions relating to army promotions, relationships and so on. Also, MIRA has learned that a number of foreign countries and other parties have blackmailed Sultan and the Kingdom through the procurement of material evidence depicting his immoral behaviour. This may explain some of the policies that the Kingdom has adopted in order to suit the political and strategic interests of such countries.

Obviously, from the Islamic point of view this is scandalous as Sultan is the Defence Minister of the country in which there exist the holy shrines of Islam. Furthermore what is striking is not so much his absence of devotion to Islam but his intolerance of practising Muslims. He is reported to have severely beaten one of his new employees. The unfortunate man had ventured to call for prayer at one of his residences (the call being a regular practice, officially enjoyed all over the Kingdom).

As far as corruption is concerned, the Defence Minister is one of the richest multi-billionaires in the world. He has used the defence ministry to amass an untold amount of wealth in the 32 year period he has been at its head. Hundreds of thousands of dollars have been spent on the armed forces over this period. Yet it arose that of the total amount spent only 5% was effectively used for the purchase of military hardware and training. It will not be difficult to imagine where the remaining 95% went. Meanwhile the Arabian armed forces humiliated by Sultan himself, ill-equipped and lacking obvious military training were caught unprepared in 1991 by the invading Iraqi army. That the whole episode was a foreign conspiracy is self-evident as far as we are concerned, it remains though that Sultan and his brothers turned the US military assistance into a glorious episode through the manipulation of their subservient media.

Bandar bin SultanFor those who know him, Bandar has grown up unhappy and deprived of any real fatherly love. His mother was a slave girl of Sudanese origin, which caused his father to steer clear of him. Because of the status of his mother, his father, Defence Minister Sultan has for a long time denied that Bandar was his son. So intense was Sultan’s irrational behaviour that he thought that Bandar would grow up with a slave mentality. Sultan only refrained from disowning Bandar as a result of King Faisal’s intervention.

Bandar was born in 1950 and, owing to his father’s rejection spent most of his childhood with his uncles. He would only meet other members of his family on special occasions such as at gatherings at his aunt Hissa al-Sudeiriyah. He also made good childhood relationships with the Sudeiri children, such as his half brothers Fahd bin Sultan (born in 1953) and Khalid bin Sultan (1949) and also with his cousins Mohammed bin Fahd (1948), Sultan bin Fahd (1951) and Su’ud bin Nayef (1955).

At the insistence of, his now mature child and Bandar’s uncles, Sultan eventually agreed to meet Bandar and patched up his relationship with him. To Sultan’s surprise, the unwanted child showed a high level of intelligence, which he had developed in the company of the Sudanese in whose company he grew up after being rejected by his other brothers.

Bandar was then sent to attend American schools along with the other Sudeiri children. In 1967, he joined the British Air Force Academy in Cornwall. After his graduation he was sent for further training in American air bases in Texas and in Carolina. At the end of his air force training, Bandar joined John Hopkins University in the United States where he graduated four years later in International Relations and Politics.

Bandar’s relations with the United States started under the Presidency of Jimmy Carter where he built up strong ties with Carter’s collaborators, Hamilton Jordan and Robert Strauss. He thus, gradually eased himself into the position of intermediary between his country and the American Administration by conveying messages and views between the two sides.

In 1979, during a trip to the United States, Bandar paid a visit to President Jimmy Carter who stressed his country’s strong relationship with Saudi Arabia and promised assistance to Riyadh if the Iran-Iraq war threatened the Saudi Kingdom.

Following Iran’s initial victories over Iraq and the occupation of part of the Basra area by Iranian troops, the United States sent on 28th September 1981 a delegation to Arabia headed by General David Jones, joint Chief of Staff, to convey to them that the turn of the war was worrying Washington who feared the fall of the House of Saud. The American delegation was welcomed at Dahran Airport by Prince Fahd bin Abdallah and Prince Bandar who was then promoted to the position of commander of a squadron of jet fighters.

The House of Saud, which was already alarmed by Iranian victories over Iraq, enabled Bandar to play a key role in acquiring AWACS radar planes. Requested by Bandar, General David Jones conveyed to the Carter Administration the Saudi need for the AWACS, but the pro-Zionist lobby in Congress opposed the sale of AWACS to an Arab country on the grounds that it this would constitute a threat to Israel.

But months later, the Saudi’s felt an even greater need for the AWACS. They needed someone who could convince Washington of such an urgent need and give assurances that the radar planes would not be a threat to the Zionist State. The House of Saud agreed that the man tailor-made for this mission was Bandar, who indeed succeeded and thus, Arabia obtained the American-manned AWACS.

His success earned him the promotion of Ambassador to Washington. Bandar soon became very friendly with the Head of Operations at the CIA who was in charge of contacting foreign diplomatic missions in Washington. He reportedly involved himself in CIA activities and surprised diplomats with lavish parties parties organised by his wife Fiha, daughter of Faisal bin Abdelaziz in defiance to the Kingdom’s traditions and moral code.

One of the missions entrusted to Bandar was to find a solution to the Palestinian issue and the recognition of Israel by the Arab States. Being involved with the CIA, Bandar also played a role in the Western Sahara in favour of Morocco in its dispute with Spain. Similarly, he played a role in the Lebanese conflict and was in charge of supplying the Phalangist movement with Saudi arms and armoured vehicles through Port Said and via Malta, but his plan was frustrated when the Maltese authorities intercepted the ship.

In the Lebanon hostage crisis he stated to Al-Sharq al-Awsat (25/02/85) that he was making every effort to obtain the release of the hostages. In Sudan, he intervened on the side of the separatists of the South and provided them with financial and medical assistance. His relationship with the CIA led him to becoming entrusted with a mission to assassinate Sheikh Fadlallah of the Lebanese Hisbullah but the bomb intended to kill the man missed its target. Bandar also involved himself in many other murky affairs such as with the Nicaraguan Contras.

Arms DealIs the Defence Minister Prince Sultan fond of arms deals because of the cash rewards they bring ? or, has the House of Saud been pressurised into buying American arms for other reasons? At the end of January, there was extensive Press coverage in the United States concerning an accord which stipulated that the Saudi rulers, had in principle, agreed to buy up to one hundred F16 jet fighters for an estimated value of $25 billion – $30 billion. According to an anonymous official who spoke to the press the deal will be signed during a future, but unspecified, visit to Washington by the Saudi Defence Minister.

According to expert sources in the arms trade, the total cost of the fighter planes is just $2.5 billion, whilst the outstanding balance is alleged to cover spare parts and maintenance for the jets and the training of the flight crews !

This deal comes as a surprise for several reasons. To begin with, the Saudi army does not need a new air defence system nor does it even need reinforcement. The Yamama deal with Britain (in the mid-1980′s) and the earlier American-bought AWACS and F15 planes more than cover the needs of Arabia’s air defence. In addition, none of these planes have ever been used.

What is even more surprising is that the deal comes at a time of dire economic crisis in the Kingdom: The Government’s total debt has spiralled to more than $100 billion and if one includes unemployment (already at a staggering 25% of the active population), rising inflation, the rapidly decreasing income level per capita and poor social services, one cannot find any justification for new, very costly and otherwise unwarranted military spending.

It is equally interesting, and curious to say the least, that the deal has come at a time when the Saudi rulers are basically at the mercy of America, with the latter literally occupying Arabia and looting its resources against a background of anti-American guerrilla operations. So, is the deal a mere deal, or does Washington have a few cards up its sleeves which enables it to put a knife to the House of Saud’s throats? Moreover, why would Riyadh enter into such a new deal when it has already passed deals with the United States totalling $25 billion and whose payment facility spreads to the year 2,000.

This deal also comes at a critical time in the bitter dispute between the different members of the House of Saud over the succession to King Fahd. However, if, as it appears, such a deal does not worry the Americans it is possible that they are already certain of who the eventual victor in the succession conflict will be.

Another reason to be vigilant remains that the leaks concerning the arms deal follow shortly after the FBI’s Director Louis Freeh’s angry outburst about the Saudi rulers’ secretive approach to the inquiry over the anti-American bomb attack at al-Khobar on 25th June last year. At a meeting with Washington Post staff, he expressed his frustration about the lack of Saudi cooperation. The Attorney General, Janet Renois, also made a similar statement on the same day. Was this a coincidence, or did these two officials have the green light to do so for other reasons ? What is clear is that not only will this arms deal cause even further financial hardship for the Arabian people, but that it may also have serious consequences for America too.

So what are the possible motives behind this deal. Could it possibly be that the Saudi rulers are trying to placate the Americans after having lied to, and embarrassed the Americans about the authors of the Khobar attack ? Or, on the contrary, is the US Administration raising the stakes by using the FBI’s Director’s angry remarks to strategically secure more leverage over the House of Saud by forcing the deal through?

In our view, the deal is not being used to boost the Kingdom’s air defence, nor is it an attempt by Riyadh to placate the Americans in the Khobar bombing affair. Simple though the explanation may be, it appears as if the Defence Minister Prince Sultan believes that he will again make a huge commission on the deal as he did on the Yamama deal with Britain which was revealed by the British press at the time. Clearly his highness has not learnt his lesson.

As mentioned, experts in the Arm’s trade have calculated that out of the total amount of $25 – $30 billion spent on the deal, only $2.5 billion is for the actual purchase of the F16 fighter jets. It is, therefore, totally inconceivable that the remaining $22.5 – $27.5 billion is for spare parts, training and maintenance. The reality, (which is now common knowledge) is to be paid in commission to the Sultan himself, his son Bandar and other close advisors and intermediaries such as arms dealers.

This deal will further strain the Kingdom’s economy, and thereby generate not only more hardship for the Saudi population but further anti-government and anti-American feeling. Undoubtedly, it could lead to increased anti-American violence.

US press comments, however, gave numerous reasons as to why the deal should not go through. It was argued that if such enormous funds were available to the Saudis, then they would do better to alleviate the population’s suffering by spending the amount on much needed social services. The US Press underlined the point that the Saudi economy could not support such expenditure, and noted that America would, by agreeing to this deal, undermine, and thus jeopardise the very stability of the pro-American Kingdom.

Such comments do point to a new awareness in America concerning the dangerous policy Washington is following towards Arabia. But this awareness does not stem from a novel, altruistic notion following on from the Vietnamese, Lebanese and Somali experiences, as unfortunately, it has needed two bomb attacks targeting US military installations in Arabia to drive home to the Americans that perhaps their country is easing itself into yet another quagmire. But still, some decision-makers in the Clinton Administration stubbornly seek to mortgage Arabia’s oil for generations to come; so that if any political shift occurs in Arabia which questions the US domination of the Kingdom’s oil resources, then the United States could invoke international law in order to justify a military intervention. In other words, it looks as if Washington is paving the way for the law of the jungle in Arabia, thus inaugurating what Chomsky called the new world disorder.

Khalid bin Sultan Bin Abdel Aziz

Lineage:
Prince Khalid bin Sultan bin Abdulaziz. Must be known to many people. During the second Gulf war, he came on the news repeatedly due to his involvement in the war and because of the many gaffes he made. The Americans fought the anti-Iraqi war, but Khalid alleged that he won it He is the son of Defence Minister Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz and of Laila bint Ahmad Abdallah bin Uthman, sister of the late King Fasals wife Iffat al Thaniyan. He was born on 23rd September 1949 in Makkah and studied at the King Saud School for princes in Riyadh. Unlike his half brother Bandar, whose mother was a slave girl, Khalid was the subject of much attention from his father who saw in him his successor at the head of the Defence Ministry.

Education:
At a very young age, he was sent to train at Sandhursts military academy in Britain from where he graduated in 1967. He was then sent to Fort Pills in Texas for advanced training in air defence. He is said to have completed an MA in military Sciences at Fort Lefnort military Academy (Kansas City) in 1979. Meanwhile, he is alleged to have joined the Maxwell Air Warfare Academy in Alabama in 1980 and, strange though it may seem, he is officially reported to have carried, at the same time, yet another MA in Administrative and Political Sciences at Montgomery University, Alabama, only one year after the previous MA. Some people do have an extraordinary IQ and time.

In any case, back in Arabia, he was promoted very swiftly. He successively occupied the positions of Air Squadron Chief, Training Officer/ Assistant Staff Officer for Operations, Army Inspectorate Chief. Director of the Administration of Air Defence Projects, Deputy Chief of the Air Force, Chief of Air Defence and, to crown it all, Chief of the Strategic Missiles Force.

Quest of Notoriety:
Prince Khalid was in the shadow during his studies and while in the various offices he occupied. His urge to become known nationally and to be heard of internationally led him to do what the other Gulf princes normally do, that is to give an astonishing donation to save a westerner in danger of death. Khalid did just that when he offered a huge amount of money to an American child who needed a heart and kidneys transplant. He announced this sensational news in front of an American television crew during a holiday in the Bermudas.

But Khalid came to notoriety through his dealings with the London-based arms merchant Mohammad Wafiq al-Said. Arms deals involving Defence Minister Sultan and his sons made Wafiq al-Said a billionaire and Khalid the same. The first deal in which Khalid was involved alongside al-Said appears to have been the purchase of administrative equipment for an air defence system, bought from France in January 1984a deal which was, at that time, the biggest arms deal the French had ever made.

The commissions made on the it were to the tune of $750 million, with $300 million taken by Prince Khalid alone. Khalid also shared with his father, his brother Bandar, al-Said and others, a two billion dollar deal for the purchase of 10 Boeing transport planes and their spare parts for Saudia Airlines in 1984 (Sunday Times 5/8/84). During the scandal over the £20 billion Yamama deal with Britain in 1984, Khalid was mentioned in the international press as being involved in the commissions which reportedly reached half the total of the cost of only the Tornado jets side of the Yamama deal. Witnessing before an American civil court, a former head of the British Arms Company, Gerald James said that each Tornado was sold to the Saudis for £40 million whereas the standard price is only £20-22 million.

Another nine billion dollar deal with American for the supply of F15 fighter jets was reported in the international press as having a real value of four billion dollars. Khalid was again quoted as having pocketed a share of the remaining five billion dollar commission alongside his father, brothers, King Fahd and the usual sharks around them.

The air surveillance AWACS radar planes deal of 1980, organized by Bandar bin Sultan, also involved a hefty commission for Khalid whose name was mentioned in this connection in the Dooley Papers. The usual partners in the deal got their share of commission through Global Enterprise Group, a company set up for this particular purpose.

Khalid Enters the Media World:
After the 1979 Sacred Mosque incident, the Iran-Iraq war and some other scandals involving their royal highnesses, the House of Saud, and the Sudeiris in particular, realized the importance of a media network under their control. So, from 1984 on, they embarked on building a veritable media network which has come to include many Arabic dailies and weeklies as well as radio and television stationsmost of international coverage. Once the network was in place, Prince Khalid was pushed to the fore mainly to project the Sudeiri familys views to the world.

Khalids first appearance in the media world was his attempt to buy the British daily The Observer. He offered a very attractive price but, however moderate an Arab he was in the eyes of the West, he remained after all an Arab and, in the view of some shadowy political lobbies, the Arab must not be given the opportunity to own media of international coverage. Hence, his offer to buy the British daily was turned down.

Continuing in his attempts, he bought off the Lebanese newspaper El-Hayat in 1988 and started its daily publication from London under the editorship of a former Lebanese Maronite, Jihad al-Khazen. Meanwhile, he bought actions in the Bahraini daily Al-Ayyam and later founded the weekly Al-Wasat in London. About a year ago, he set up the Arab-American Television station in the United States.

Even though all the Saudi-controlled media are in the hands of the Sudeiris, conflict between them erupted over many petty issues, which led them to a lot of bickering in public. This is how Al-Sharq al-Awsatfounded by Khalids uncle Salman! published the photo of Prince Khalids mistress Brigitte Nelson, while Khalids El-Hayat published King Fahds mistress Leila Alawi.

Desert Storm Blows Khalid Away:
Khalids career declined sharply with the second Gulf war. King Fahd entrusted him with the catering service of the anti-Iraqi coalition of forces under the leadership of American General Schwartzkopff. Misleadingly named by the Saudi monarch Chief of the joint forces. He was, in fact, simply a collaborator of the Americans against his own people because of assisting the friendly forces over sensitive issues likely to cause anti-American unrest among the Arabian people. His being constantly present alongside General Schartzkopff in the Operations Room got him some media coverage both nationally and internationally. So, he soon became too big for his boots. Apart from diverting an important part of the catering budget, which aggravated Washington, he dared criticize General Schwartzkopff, who had returned to America. Later Khaled wrote in his book Desert Warrior that the success of the Gulf war was due to his own planning.

Even more compromizing was his statement shortly after the war over the necessity of rearming the Arabian army (under the command of his father Sultan) and the National Guard (under the command of Crown Prince Abdallah, Sultans rival), and the need to make compulsory conscription, all of which are sensitive issue within the House of Sauds carefully maintained balance of forces. Other revelations made in his book, and which had been concealed by the Americans, regarding the role of the joint Arab troops during the Gulf war caused some friction between Washington and Riyadh which was the last straw and caused his downfall. Ironically King Fahad sacked him in humiliating circumstances for the same reason. Khaled went too far in his own imagination of being the Commander of the Forces. King Fahad was extremely furious when Khaled took several decisions without consulting him.

Khalid has ever since been ignored by the regime and the Saudi media. He has gradually slumped into oblivion. Neither his father, nor his estimated wealth of $10 billion have been of any assistance to remember him to the world. Perhaps another $50 billion donation to help control AIDS in America might do the trick

Prince Faisal bin Fahd Bin Abdel AzizPrince Faisal, son of King Fahd bin Abdulaziz, was born in 1945. He did most of his studies in the Kingdom and obtained a BA in Political Sciences from abroad.

His first job was in 1971 as Head of the Youth Department with ministerial rank. The Labour Ministry was also attached to his Department. Since then, he has had many positions, all within the youth and sport areas. He was successively President of the Arab Football Union, Arabian Football Union, Arabian Olympic Committee, Arab Sports Union and Head of the National Committee on Drugs Control. At the international and regional level, Faisal bin Fahd was nominated Honorary President of the International Swimming Federation. In 1974 he became Chairman of the Arab Ministers’ Council on Youth and of member of the Supreme Council of Youth which was set up that very year. Finally, he acquired the position of President of the Basket Ball Federation. During his term in these positions, he naturally attended a great many sports events including the conferences of the International Football Federation in Munich between 1972 and 1974.

Faisal has been kept in the same position since he was appointed to it in 1971 at the time of King Faisal, when his own father was Interior Minister. In the meantime, his brothers and cousins in the Sudeiri family had been raised to higher offices. In fact, were it not for the present system of succession to the throne, which was established by his grand father King Abdulaziz, Faisal would have had the chance to become king himself, especially as he is well educated. So, why is it that he has been kept in the same position when he is not less eager than his relatives to wield power? Faisal bin Fahd was connected with the Youth Department at an early age, when the situation of sport in the kingdom was dismal with almost inexistent sport facilities. His appointment at the head of this Department coincided with the oil boom.

The plan was to make sport popular among the youth. But the ultimate objective of the Sudeiris was a long term strategic one. The point was to keep young people busy in order to protect the grip on power by the House of Saud. Many countries, like the former Soviet bloc, used sport as a means to keep their youth away from any political or intellectual activity. Various studies exist which show that the use of sport for such ends put state budgets for games second only to military expenditure in such countries.

As a by-product of this objective, another not less devious goal was sought: the creation of a feeling of national, ‘Saudi’ belonging which would supersede and even marginalize the Arabian youth’s sense of belonging to the wider Arab and Islamic Ummah. For this purpose Saudi Arabia had to fix the ways and means to train a sport-oriented youth which would enable the Kingdom to have access to International events and Olympic games to eventually instil this sense in an ever greater number of youths.

The House of Saud gave Faisal all the prerogatives to attain this goal. With an annual budget of $20 billion for the Youth Department, Faisal embarked on a programme of impressive sport facilities and training and visits to various world-famous clubs were regularly undertaken and Western coaches recruited at great costs. With the assistance of his brother Sultan bin Fahd, Faisal undertook the construction of sport villages, centres and stadia, clubs and fully staffed training facilities of all kinds at a cost considered enough to be meet the nations needs until the year 2000. One particular sports complex occupies an area of 80,000 m2 and cost xxxxxxx1,280 Saudi Riyals.

It accommodates swimming pools, Olympic-standard activity areas, restaurants for 1,000 people and a purpose-made building for the House of Saud and their guests. Faisal had similar complexes built in the other major cities like Riyadh, Jeddah and Dammam. Alongside these facilities, separate Olympic-grade swimming pools, youth hostels as well as unions and clubs for all sorts of games were set up. At the same time, Faisal undertook to have the Saudi national team and clubs join international federations. It was in this context that, in 1976, he hired the British football coach Jimmy Hill. Hill was given a special budget with prerogatives to train young people of all ages, everywhere in the kingdom. In a move to boost the country’s chance of winning matches and get promoted to higher divisions, Faisal hired several western players at prohibitive costs.

Therefore, the cost of hanging on to power is double: on the one hand, billions of pounds have been spent out of the country’s wealth; on the other hand, through sport the youth is being alienated from its Islamic values and traditions, and is being made redundant intellectually. Not that sport as such is the “opium of the people,” but the very policy which underlies it is intentionally devious and harmful. Whereas the Sudeiri brothers— morally and financially corrupt—are banking on time to instil in the youth the a sense of narrow nationalism and regionalism, the late Al-Saud kings can be credited with keeping away from these concepts for religious reasons and because of the kingdom’s religious weight in the Muslim world. Apart from heading the Sudeiri family’s policy of alienating Saudi youth, Prince Faisal is no exception in the world of financial corruption. His commissions are reported to be 30% of the budget of his Youth Department. This classic way of obtaining commissions is no different from that of his father, uncles, brothers and cousins: a percentage is taken on each project, service and equipment supplies. Another percentage is taken annually on the earnings of each of the facilities. Yet a further source of illegal income comes from the budget devoted to sports events both at home and abroad.

Faisal’s embezzlement was not limited to the sports world and his Department. According to two authors, Nacer Said (History of the House of Saud, Arabic p. 773) and AbderRahman Al-Shamrani (The Scandal Kingdom, Arabic, vol. 2, p. 287), Faisal obtained a commission of $40 million from the European company Philips which was entrusted with the modernization of the country’s telephone system in the seventies. Meanwhile Faisal was involved in the confiscation of poor people’s lands. He is known to have taken 4 million m2 of land along the Jeddah sea shore, while he confiscated the Dammam Project no. 92 which included 92,000 allotments distributed to impoverished people. Property licences were suddenly withdrawn from the beneficiaries overnight without any valid explanation and the lands were given to Prince Faisal. The latter’s embezzlement from real estates is reported to be much higher than the commissions he acquired through his office at the head of the Youth Department.

King Fahd who used to prepare his sons for high offices became desperate about Faisal’s disastrous behaviour. This explains why the King, his father, has decided not to promote him. Indeed Faisal is known to be both a homosexual and a chronic drug addict. For all this, King Fahd reportedly continued to test him. In the hope of getting him to improve, he gave him several sensitive missions to Gorbatchev’s Soviet Union and to communist China under cover of sporting events. But this was to no avail as Faisal continued his drug addition and went even as far as having a drug wing under his control, which led to complaints from various foreign diplomatic and intelligence services to the Saudi authorities, according to a journalist close to the royal family. As a remedy, Faisal was sent to the West for drug addiction treatment. It was at that time that he was appointed president of the Drug Control Committee, a move meant to encourage him to give up taking drugs but, again, to no avail.

In view of his son’s hopelessness, King Fahd decided to groom his other two sons, Muhammed and Abdulaziz bin Fahd, for high positions. Muhammed was then dropped and the King concentrated his attention on Abdulaziz. The latter received $300 million from the state’s budget while his father transferred to him another all his fortune both in real estates and in money—a total estimated to be to the tune of $40 billion. Needless to say that all this aggravated Faisal who saw his chances of promotion gone, perhaps for ever.

Yet, Faisal is not poor: the wealth he stole or was given from the people’s stolen wealth is estimated to be between seven and ten billion dollars. He is still relatively young, so he still may have a lot of time to plunder and become richer.

Translated from Arabic

From Page 1

Click to enlarge

From the last page

Source: Pakalert

A Vision of the Future?

2010-06-09T04:55:00.000-04:00

By Phaedrus

Free Speech and Google

2010-06-09T04:46:00.002-04:00

By Phaedrus

I note that Google have, thus far, not taken down this blog or its illustrious forerunner, World Peace. That would be a plus point for them, all other things being equal, but things are far from equal. Some people, most frequently the Jews and their Communist cronies, have accused this blogger of 'hate speech' - this has become the inevitable cry from the enemies of freedom when they want to prevent someone from simply stating uncomfortable facts. This blogger has only ever campaigned against unjust and illegal wars and the Jews' dominant role therein - yet these reptiles brand me a hate-monger. It just shows how twisted the world they have fashioned has become.

Anyway, sadly it looks as if these enemies of Truth have once again at least partially gotten their way, because I quickly established that Google is up to its old tricks and censoring search results for this blogspot, just as they did with World Peace (interestingly, just at the point where I called for a nationwide tax boycott bandwagon). So here too, those who seek a little enlightenment on the extent of the influence of the Jews in our lives will find their curiosity goes unsatisfied. If you didn't already know the type of material posted here and what the URL for it is, you would never be able to find it, and Google could quite frankly care less.

It could be argued that whilst people have a Constitutional right to free speech enshrined in law, there is no complimentary right to be heard. At first sight, this point of view is understandable. But on deeper examination it is such a restrictive interpretation of the law that it effectively annuls that precious right to free speech in the first place. The other aspect of this matter is that it is inherently unfair, because the spectrum of 'permissible opinion' - which should be free and unfettered - is being artificially constrained. I don't see any Marxist-orientated, pro-NWO bloggers having their articles suppressed in Google search results. Curious, that.

Bloggers like Phaedrus, who hold views which are currently unfashionable (yes, that's all they are in reality and times can and do change) find ourselves effectively gagged. We cannot reach a wider audience with our 'unacceptable views' essentially because they're currently unfashionable. On the other hand, if you want to heartily praise the virtues of Marxism, globalization and multiculturalism, for example, then go right ahead! Google will ensure that your views are swiftly propagated to the four corners of the planet. Kinda stinks, doesn't it?

The Voice Of Phaedrus

Curtis Maynard's Obituary

2010-04-25T22:44:00.001-04:00

Curtis Boone Maynard

Curtis B. Maynard, 42, of Holiday Lakes passed away Wednesday, April 21, 2010.

A memorial service will be held Sunday, April 25, 2010, at 3:00 p.m. at Brazoria First Assembly Church in Brazoria.

Curtis served in the United States Armed Forces as a Calvary scout and was a well educated man, receiving his Masters of Psychology, Masters of History & Politics, Bachelors of Arts & Science and Associate of Nursing degrees from the University of A&M. He was also an electrician.

He leaves behind his wife, Jolee and an unborn child; children, Ava Maynard (2) & Danielle Maynard (12); parents, Ed Maynard and Leslie Maynard; brothers, Mike Maynard & Chuck Maynard.

Curtis was beloved by his wife, his children, his family and many friends and co-workers. He will be dearly missed.

Online condolences may be sent to www.palmsfuneralhome.com

Published April 25, 2010

Curtis Maynard's Murder/Suicide: Something Just Does NOT Add Up!

2010-04-25T22:00:00.000-04:00

I was first alerted to the death of fellow blog writer, and freedom fighter, Curtis Boone Maynard, late on Thursday, April 22, and I was shocked. I, like others, has been watching Maynard's blogs and following his writings for years. The idea that he would kill his ex-wife, and then take his own life, was a total shock to everyone, including myself.

Here is one article from www.chron.com, explaining the death of Curtis Maynard, and his ex-wife in great detail. Most of the facts as provided by the Lake Jackson Texas police is presented here, and I want all of my readers to look at this article, and please pay close attention to some facts as presented. My comments will follow:

Man kills ex-wife, then himself

Lake Jackson murder-suicide followed bitter divorce, woman's lawyer says

By PEGGY O'HARE
HOUSTON CHRONICLE

April 23, 2010, 12:17AM

The Lake Jackson woman shot to death by her ex-husband before he killed himself during a police chase had gone through a bitter, contentious divorce from him and suffered personal attacks from him on the Internet, her attorney said on Thursday.

Melissa Meza, 34, a Dow Chemical engineer, was shot multiple times in the front yard of her home Wednesday night by 42-year-old Curtis Boone Maynard, a registered nurse, who later shot himself. The couple had been divorced for more than a year.

Maynard also shot his 16-year-old stepdaughter, Celeste Morales, in the face inside the home before fleeing in his car. Morales remains in stable condition at Memorial Hermann-Texas Medical Center.

Maynard and Meza's two children, a 12-year-old girl and 2-year-old girl, fled to a neighbor's house and were not hurt, said Lake Jackson police Lt. Paul Kibodeaux

“The 12-year-old picked the 2-year-old up and ran to the neighbor's house — very brave,” Kibodeaux said.

Lenette Terry, the Angleton attorney who represented Meza in her divorce from Maynard, called the slain woman's ex-husband “a nut.”

Divorce final last year

The divorce was very contentious, Terry said Thursday. Maynard “always did crazy things,” she said. “This guy also had some horrible things about her on the Internet and he sent them to her boss at Dow — she brought the stuff in to me and she reported it to the Lake Jackson Police Department.

“She knew she had to get out of this relationship with him. She knew she had to protect her kids. And she was right,” Terry said.

Maynard and Meza met in 1996. They married in August 2005 in Brazoria County, state records show. But the marriage soured in just three years, and Meza filed for divorce in December 2008.

The former couple also had a contested temporary hearing concerning the custody of their children. “She prevailed,” Terry recalled. “He would do things like leave the infant at home when he would go walk to Randall's (grocery store).”

In an angry blog railing against his divorce attorney, Maynard claimed that he and Meza had agreed during their marriage that he would not work on weekdays so he could stay home to care for their youngest daughter, and that he would work only on weekends, which he said put a significant dent in his income. He referred to himself as the “primary caregiver” of the youngest girl and said he had sought sole custody of their two daughters.

The couple's divorce became final in March 2009, but Maynard would not let go, even though Meza had a boyfriend.

On Wednesday, Maynard had been sending text messages to his ex-wife “throughout the day,” Kibodeaux said. Police don't yet know if she responded to him, but she complained about the text messages to a witness.

At 8:20 p.m., neighbors reported hearing gunshots at Meza's home in the 100 block of Post Oak, a quiet, tree-lined street of upper-middle-class houses. The teenager was shot inside the house, while Meza was shot in the front yard, Kibodeaux said.

“She was later shot more times in a different location, but close by, so I would think she was trying to take cover or concealment and was shot again,” Kibodeaux said. Meza had multiple wounds in the head and upper torso, he said.

First homicide in years

Maynard left a shotgun in the front yard, then got in his 1994 Lincoln sedan and drove away, Kibodeaux said. A neighbor followed Maynard's car while on the phone with 911, giving police information on which direction he was heading.

When Lake Jackson police caught up to Maynard's car heading northward on Texas 288 slightly above the 65 mph speed limit, Maynard shot himself in the head with another gun, a semi-automatic rifle, while he was driving, police said.

Maynard's car then veered on to the highway shoulder, where it struck a sport utility vehicle occupied by a mother and her two children that had pulled over to yield to the emergency vehicles. The gunman's car then veered into the grass and back across the highway's two northbound lanes before stopping on the inside shoulder.

The woman and two children inside the SUV hit by Maynard suffered no obvious injuries, but were taken to an Angleton hospital as a precaution, Kibodeaux said.

Police said they have not found anything in writing to indicate that Maynard had planned on taking violent action against anyone, but said they still must review his and his former wife's cell phone records.

“We have seen a few e-mails (from Maynard), but mainly they were character attacks and no indication there would be action taken,” Kibodeaux said.

Meza and Maynard's daughters are now staying with a close family friend, police said.

Child Protective Services caseworkers are meeting with the children's maternal and paternal grandparents about making more permanent living arrangements, Kibodeaux said.

Meza's death marked the first homicide in Lake Jackson in about a decade, the police lieutenant said.

NTS Notes: When I first read this article, and others, that presented the facts behind Maynard's death as a murder/suicide, I did not bother to look too closely into any of the details, or consider that some of the facts did not add up. I like others do not condone in any way what Mr. Maynard did to his ex-wife in any way. However, now upon further investigation of the facts presented, some things just do not make sense!

One of the glaring irregularities behind this murder/suicide, that has also been noted now by other bloggers is the fact that Curt Maynard supposedly was driving at 65 Miles Per Hour in his vehicle and while at that speed, he supposedly took a rifle to his head and blew his brains out! I know that I do not want to upset readers, but please think about this.... How could someone take a rifle to his or her own head and pull the trigger while still being able to drive at 65 MPH??? To me, it seems that he was shot by the pursuing police, and to further make Maynard look crazy, the police themselves concocted the idea that he pulled the trigger on a shotgun himself while driving!

One other strange thing is that other bloggers have noted that Curt Maynard's attitude before he supposedly went and shot his ex-wife did not show any signs of the psychology of an individual that would do such a crazy and suicidal thing. This article says that he was a "nut" but I myself am sorry to tell these experts that Curt Maynard's blogs were for the truth, and he in no way came across as a nut! If telling the truth makes you a nut, then I guess I am in that group for sure! Guaranteed, the pro-government and anti-truth bloggers will be all over this murder/suicide, and use it as a basis of labelling ALL seekers of the real truth as nut cases!

As I have already said... Some things about this murder/suicide do not add up. Hopefully some truth will finally come out about this very sorry story.

RIP Curt Maynard. Let us hope that he is remembered for his fine work in exposing the criminals and his tireless searching for the real truth.

More to come

NTS

Source: Northern Truthseeker

Hitler’s Most Trenchant Speech - Biographer John Toland

2010-04-23T08:30:00.000-04:00

HITLER’S MOST TRENCHANT SPEECH
BIOGRAPHER JOHN TOLAND
By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2010

Articles May Be Reproduced Only With Authorship of Br Nathanael Kapner
& Link To Real Zionist News (SM)

Support Brother Nathanael! HERE

Or Send Your Contribution To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 1242; Frisco CO 80443
E-mail: bronathanael@yahoo.com

Unique Source: “Adolf Hitler,” John Toland Here

For The Best Alternative News CLICK: Rense.com Here

DESCRIBING JOHN TOLAND’S WRITINGS as being “scrupulously accurate,” the New York Times joined literary critics from around the world in praising the renowned historian’s works.

The Times’ acclamation of Toland included his biography Adolf Hitler…Zionism’s ultimate weapon in bludgeoning generation after generation into emotional, if not intellectual, submission.

Toland’s masterwork, Adolf Hitler, touted as the “definitive biography” of Germany’s dictator, outlines in detail many of Hitler’s speeches, beginning with those sponsored by the budding German Worker’s Party, (later changed by Hitler to include the term National Socialist), in the early 1920’s.

One such speech, “Free State or Slavery,” delivered by Hitler in 1922, Toland describes as Hitler’s “most trenchant speech.” A look up of the word for those not too familiar with it, shows it to mean ‘vigorous,’ ‘incisive,’ ‘effective’ and ‘sharply defined.’

Sadly, extremist Jewry owns the basic thought processes of most of the ‘Western mind’ by virtue of its total control of the mass media. We should also mention, what was even predicted by Hitler in 1944 as the war appeared lost, that Herzl’s demon seed, Zionism, has now achieved massive and essentially complete subjugation over the Western world.

The dominant NAMES are not Catholic, Methodist, Buddhist, or Hindu…they are ‘Jewish’ names. A quick check of our beleaguered planet today informs that a scant 0.2% of the world’s population refers to itself as ‘Jewish.’ There are only 7 million ‘Jews’ in Israel and slightly less than that number in the US.

Yet, despite their microscopic numbers on the planet, ‘Jews’ through unceasing media and political propaganda, mass mind control, blackmail, bribery, genocide, and many other ‘tools’ literally dominate and manipulate the destiny of dozens of key nations and their enormous populations.

Why when the word ‘Hitler’ is mentioned does the average person immediately become fearful and defensive at varying levels of consciousness and intellect? The answer is cradle-to-grave Zionist-Illuminati mind control…birthed and bred with the legend of the ‘Holocaust’ of WWII.

An honest inquiry demands that one start with the names…because the NAMES tell the story. Look at Wall Street, look at the Federal Reserve and dozens of other giant power centers.

So, in writing this column about the long dead and misunderstood dictator of Nazi Germany, how are we to be able to honestly and openly and objectively analyze what the man was SAYING and DOING through his speeches? If Hitler was the greatest ‘evil’ in all of history - as the extremist Jewish agenda states - how can it be that we TRULY know so little about him?

How many of you have even read a simple biography by a credible historian about him? Virtually no one has. At best, the average American has seen a Zionist agenda-backed short TV ‘documentary’ about him on The History Channel. Hardly a worthy way to study anything of such great magnitude. For the record, as any honest look at history is concerned, Stalin, for example, made Hitler look like a Boy Scout.

But back to the important subject of this essay: The speech by Adolf Hitler that his greatest biographer termed “Hitler’s most trenchant.”

The electric address has as its impetus events surrounding the assassination of the Jew, Walter Rathenau, German Foreign Minister, on June 24, 1922. As a result of the assassination, the Weimer government hastily passed the Law For The Protection Of The Republic, a Draconian decree designed to halt criticism of Weimar officials. (Sound familiar?)

Opposition to the law came from German nationalists of all shadings. At the height of the controversy, Hitler was released from his 5-week term in jail where he reassessed his churning ideas into a more aggressive thrust. The future fuehrer wasted no time joining the protest on the very day of his release with his speech, “Free State or Slavery,” delivered on July 28, 1922 in Munich.

Hitler’s apparent target was the new law — but in fact — as Toland brings out: “the speech was a denunciation of the Jews and their plans to conquer the world. Never before had Hitler given such a reasonable explanation of how and why the Jews had gained such power.”

It behooves us to view specific excerpts from Hitler’s speech to decide if Toland has aptly described the speech as Hitler’s “reasonable explanation” of Jewry’s attainment of power in post World War I Germany…whether we agree or not with Hitler’s remarks…or Hitler himself.

HITLER’S SPEECH
AN INDICTMENT OF THE JEWS

“IT’S A BATTLE BEGUN 120 YEARS AGO,” the speech begins, “at the moment when the Jew was granted citizen rights in the European States.”

Hitler continues, “The emancipation of the Jews was the beginning of an attack on European society. For thereby full equality was given to a people that has always formed a State within the State.”

Hitler then proceeded to expose Jewry’s hegemony over Europe’s economy: “The process of industrialization meant the confluence of great masses of workmen in the cities. As industry grew, a fourth estate was formed.

“The master-stroke of the Jew was to claim the leadership of the fourth estate: he founded the Movements both of the Social Democrats and the Communists. His policy was twofold: he had his ‘apostles’ in both political camps.

“Parallel with this was a gradual ‘moneyfication’ of the whole of the nation’s labor-strength. ‘Share-capital’ was in the ascendant and thus bit by bit the Stock Exchange came to control the whole national economy.”

Hitler then denounces the Gentiles who acted as “window dressing” for the Jews: “The directors of these institutions were without exception, Jews. I say ‘without exception,’ for the few non-Jews who had a share in them were nothing but shop-window Christians, whom one needs to keep up the appearance that these institutions were founded as a natural outcome of the needs of all peoples alike, and were not, as was the fact, institutions which correspond with the essential characteristics of the Jewish people.”

Next, Hitler denigrates Democracy as the means of Jewish ascendancy: “Under the concept of Democracy, it was possible to create a State-form by which the mastery over the herd by the Jewish intelligentsia who control the organs of information is guaranteed. Though small in numbers and therefore completely hidden in the body of the people, who quite unconscious of whom they were obeying, in the end did but serve the purposes of this small stratum of society.”

HITLER CONCLUDES HIS SPEECH by addressing the political controversy of the day: “The so-called ‘Law for the Protection of the Republic’ is nothing else than a means for reducing all criticism to silence. And what is the ultimate aim of Bolshevik Judaism in Germany? To make the nation defenseless in arms and to make the people defenseless in spirit. Two great aims!” View Entire Speech Here.

Indeed, gun control was an aggressive policy of the Weimar Republic as there was no Right to Bear Arms in the Constitution of 1919. To silence all dissent was to disarm the spirit of the German people.

In evaluating the “reasonableness” of Hitler’s speech, the question remains for freedom lovers today, have the Zionist extremist Jews (and their ‘normal’ Jewish followers) with their control of democracy and their command of the press made We The People “defenseless in spirit?” This is the question that every man’s conscience MUST confront. It would seem that the answer has become a tragic ‘yes.’

To study TRUE history is to LEARN from it…and that is one thing Zionism has targeted for absolute extinction.

___________________________________
For More See: How The Jews Prompted A German Backlash Click Here

And: Historian - ‘Did Hitler Have Reason To Hate The Jews?’ Click Here

And: Neo-Nazi Rise In Germany Frightens Jews Click Here

And: The ‘Jewish Question’ Now A Global Issue Click Here

And: Jewry’s Scheme For World Domination Click Here

And: German Jews Demand ‘No Mercy’ For Demjanjuk Click Here

Source: Real Zionist News

Pawns in the Game

2010-04-23T08:15:00.000-04:00

In 'Pawns in the Game' by William Guy Carr, he states: "Theirs has been a Long Range Plan. It started 3,000 years ago. It was revised at the meeting in Bauer's Goldsmith shop in Frankfort in 1773."

Mayer Amschel Bauer invited twelve other wealthy and influential men to a meeting in the Judenstrasse where he outlined a plan to finance and control the 'World Revolutionary Movement' by pooling their resources together.

Through clever manipulation of their combined wealth they could create such adverse economic conditions that the masses would be reduced to a state bordering starvation by unemployment. Who can deny that this has transpired? He emphasised how it would be the policy of those present to foment wars but direct the peace conferences so that no combatant obtained territorial gains and both sides would be plunged further into their debt. This has happened too...

Bauer began unfolding the plan arguing that "By the laws of nature right lies in force." He stated that it was immaterial to their success whether governments were destroyed by internal or external foes, because the victor had to seek the aid of 'Capital' which "is entirely in our hands." He added, "Those who wish to rule must have recourse to cunning and to make-believe...." Another truism and it matters not to them who runs with the ball as long as the conspirators intercept it before they shoot.

He said, "The power of our resources must remain invisible until the very moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning or force can undermine it" or "the LABOUR OF CENTURIES" will be brought to nought. He outlined how their 'Agenturs' would corrupt the morals of the youth, with alcohol, drugs and all kinds of vice. They will fool, bemuse and corrupt youngsters of all classes by teaching them false theories and principles. This has also been accomplished.

Bauer said political candidates will be servile and obedient 'pawns in the game' but behind the scenes, "The men we appoint as advisers will have been bred, reared, and trained from childhood in accordance with our ideas to rule the affairs of the whole world." He continued "Thanks to the press we have got gold in our hands not-withstanding we had to gather it out of the oceans of blood and tears... But it has paid us even though we have sacrificed many of our own people. Each victim on our side is worth a thousand Goyim."

He explained, "By executing the criminals and lunatics, after they have carried out our preconceived 'reign of terror' we can make ourselves appear as the saviours of the oppressed." Bauer went on, "we are interested in just the opposite... in the diminution, the killing out of the Goyim." He discussed the infiltration of Masonic lodges and spreading atheistic-materialistic ideology amongst the Goy and how they would disguise their malign intent with philanthropy. "When the hour strikes for our sovereign Lord of all the World to be crowned, these same hands will sweep away everything that might stand in his way." The very name of God will be erased from the 'lexicon of life.'

They planned to build up the armaments of the Goy to mutually destroy each other, leaving only a few millionaires (trillionaires) devoted to their cause and enough soldiers and police to protect them. The ultimate goal is World Government, through establishing huge monopolies and reservoirs of colossal riches. Is this not the reality today? He concluded, "You may think the Goyim will rise upon us with arms, but in the West we have against this possibility an organisation of such appalling terror... the stoutest hearts will quail. The Underground... the Metropolitans... the subterranean corridors...." established in the cities of every country.

The twenty-five points raised by Mayer Rothschild in 1773 are identical to the protocols in 'The Jewish Peril' published by Professor Nilus in 1901, the only difference is the inclusion of Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzcheism and Zionism, first organised in 1897 by Theodore Hertzl, who added new material due to the rapid development of the conspiracy and technological progress, but the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are reaching fruition and will be fulfilled when the 'Despot of the blood of Zion' seizes global power.

Pawns in the Game by William Guy Carr - 1958

http://ia350642.us.archive.org/1/items/PawnsInTheGame/Carr.-.Pawns.in.the.Game.international.conspiracy.exposed.1958.pdf

Source: Antisupremacy

Judaic attitudes to non-Jews

2010-04-23T08:00:00.000-04:00

From: Israel Shamir: shamir@home.se

Judaic attitudes to non-Jews

Often one encounters discussions about Jewish faith and its attitude to a non-Jew. Often quotes provided by various sources including that of Shahak are doubted and denied. Now for a first time you are offered an attempt of complete presentation of Jewish Orthodox sources on the subject. The one-hundred pages long treaty includes the Hebrew and Aramaic quotes in full in original and in translation; it allows full refutation of Jewish apologists and brings a lot of bright light into the situation. Written by a team of religious Jews, this treaty is still undergoes redactions, that is why it probably won't be displayed on the www.israelshamir.net site. In order to receive this document download it from

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/shamireaders/files or write to shamir@home.se with subject "attitude". It is also available in Russian; to receieve in Russian, write with subject "Russian attitude".

As a glimpse here is the summary of halachic decrees illustrating the attitude of Judaism to ... not to an ordinary goy, but to an ideal goy, as good as they come, and many rabbis say they are never that good as to deserve the caring relationship as described below. This ideal goy is called GT (ger toshav) in the summary:

1) Killing a GT (as well as any other Gentile, in principle, without a court hearing, at least in peaceful times) is forbidden. However, a Jew who murders a gentile (even in peaceful times and even intentionally) is not punishable by death in the human courts. According to some opinions he is not punishable at all by the human courts. But a GT who kills a Jew, purely by accident and unintentionally, must be put to death.

2) According to some opinions it is forbidden to desecrate the Shabbat to save the life of a GT unless there is a danger of animosity.

3) In all situations where one must choose to save either a Jew's or a GT's life or where only one of these two lives can be saved, the Jewish life must be chosen. It applies even in a situation where a criminal who is Jewish threatensing the GT's life - even then it is forbidden to kill the Jew in order to save the GT's life.

4) According to some opinions, if a Jew charges an exorbitant price or conceals the low quality of goods from a GT customer he does not owe the GT any compensation (as he would owe a Jewish customer). In any case, it is clear that if a GTgentile charges an exorbitant price or conceals the low quality of goods from a Jewish customer, he owes the Jew compensation.

5) According to most opinions it is forbidden for a Jew to consume some food products made by a GT.

6) According to most opinions, in all business transactions a Jew must be given precedence over a GT, even when this causes minor financial losses.

7) According to many opinions it is forbidden to lend money to GT without interest.

8) It is forbidden to delay the payment of the wages of a GT, but the prohibition is less severe than that of delaying a Jew's wages.

9) A GT may not be appointed to any ruling position over Jews. For example, he cannot be a judge in a Jewish court of law.

10) A GT is not considered a valid witness in a Jewish court of law.

11) A GT, as opposed to a Jew, may be easily sentenced to death in a court of law. This may be done by a single judge, based on the testimony of a single witness or his own admission of guilt, with no prior warning, even if the witness is a relative [of either the judge or the victim].

12) According to some opinions, if an animal owned by a Jew damages a GT's property the Jew is not required to pay any indemnity. But when an animal owned by a GT damages a Jew's property, the GT is obliged to pay full compensation.

13) A GT who robs or steals from a Jew (or anyone else) must be sentenced to death, whereas no Jew who robs or steals from anyone is ever sentenced to death. A Jew who steals from a GT must pay back only the sum that he stole, whereas a Jew who steals from a Jew must pay back at least twice the sum he stole.

14) The death penalty may be imposed on a GT who abducts a Jew, but not on a Jew who abducts a GT.

15) A GT must not observe the Shabbat, and he also must not establish for himself a religious festival or a religious day of rest. If he does he is to be beaten in punishment (and according to one opinion he is to be executed in punishment). According to one opinion he must not even establish for himself a secular day of rest or intentionally rest for a whole day.

16) A GT must not study the Torah. If he does he is to be beaten in punishment.

17) A Jew is not required to mourn (e.g. sit shiva) for his GT brother, sister (that is, the offspring of his father from a gentile woman), son or daughter (that is, his offspring from a gentile woman).

18) A Jew and a GT mustn't be buried side by side.

19) A Jew is not allowed to eat an animal that was slaughtered by a GT, even if it was done according to all the other rules of the Jewish law.

You may subscribe to my mailing list, it will bring you my articles and occasional forwards, by sending a blank email to
shamireaders-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

The items published in the group can be seen on http://groups.yahoo.com/group/shamireaders/messages

Visit my site www.israelshamir.net and www.israelshamir.com especially its Donations page :-)

For a discussion group, subscribe to togethernet,
togethernet-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

Israel Shamir: shamir@home.se

Source: Israel Shamir

Emicho von Leiningen vs. Arrogance and Hubris / Analysis of 1096 First Crusade / Thor Björgólfsson Learned Well

2010-04-23T07:45:00.001-04:00

DOING WELL UNTIL

Iceland used to be a prosperous country. But then they let in the usury crowd. And so they got a crisis. Which didn't happen all at once.

ENEMIES TOOK OVER

The people put their money in banks. The banks fell into foreign hands.
"Treated as celebrities in their homeland, Icelanders credit them with wresting financial control of the island from its ruling conservative elite". (Rowena Mason, Iceland falls out of love with its billionaires, Telegraph, 19 Oct 2008 )

And these foreign hands were sticky. "The first dollar billionaires to emerge from the tiny island of 300,000 inhabitants were Björgólfur Thor Björgólfsson and his father, West Ham FC owner Björgólfur Gudmundsson. Björgólfur, who has convictions for false accounting and estimated wealth of $1.bn (£635m), built up his fortune in shipping." (Rowena Mason, Iceland falls out of love with its billionaires, Telegraph, 19 Oct 2008 )

AND PLUNDERED

And when the Icelanders awakened from their slumber, the billions were gone. "Only now have citizens of the volcanic island begun to suspect they have been sitting on a gigantic pyramid scheme". (Rowena Mason, Iceland falls out of love with its billionaires, Telegraph, 19 Oct 2008 )

Of course, there were plenty of warning signs, but they were, as usual in these cases, ignored.

AND NOW THEY FEEL SO BAD ABOUT IT ALL

As a consequence, these people are now "Destitute and desperate". (per Marc Prel, Destitute and desperate, Icelanders opt for exile, AFP, 7 Apr 2010)

Yes, the people of Iceland have "such a bad feeling about what's happening here." (per Svanbjoern Einarsson cited in Marc Prel, Destitute and desperate, Icelanders opt for exile, AFP, 7 Apr 2010)

And sometimes, when things are getting really desperate, the common people come to resent the usurers.

NOT THE FIRST PLACE THIS HAS HAPPENED

Of course, the Jewish colony is Iceland is not the only one in the lands of the Europeans. No, there are "numerous Jewish colonies". (W.O. Horn, The Rhine: history and legends of its castles, abbeys, monasteries, and towns, Williams and Norgate, 1872, p 120) Colonies where the Jews were active in the "financial services" sector: "general medieval histories, if they mention Jews at all, refer to them almost exclusively as money-lenders or involved in slavery". (Norman Roth, Medieval Jewish civilization: an encyclopedia, Routledge, 2003, p 189) Colonies in places like Mainz. "The Jews here were especially hated, on account of their usurious customs, and famous for their wealth." (W.O. Horn, The Rhine: history and legends of its castles, abbeys, monasteries, and towns, Williams and Norgate, 1872, p 121)

Or, as the Telegraph puts it: "Iceland falls out of love with its billionaires". (Rowena Mason, Iceland falls out of love with its billionaires, Telegraph, 19 Oct 2008 ) "The Jews here were especially hated, on account of their usurious customs, and famous for their wealth." (W.O. Horn, The Rhine: history and legends of its castles, abbeys, monasteries, and towns, Williams and Norgate, 1872, p 121)

Billionaires.

WHEN RESENTMENT ERUPTS

In 2010, the Eyjafjallajökull volcano erupted in Iceland. Powerful forces had been building up below the surface, and when the molten rock shot out of the earth, it was quite a spectacle. Back in 1096, a group of Christians were on their way to a religious war. "At the head of the band was Emicho, Graf von Leiningen". (W.O. Horn, The Rhine: history and legends of its castles, abbeys, monasteries, and towns, Williams and Norgate, 1872, p 120) "In their journey the Rhine downwards they approached the towns chiefly inhabited by wealthy Jews". (W.O. Horn, The Rhine: history and legends of its castles, abbeys, monasteries, and towns, Williams and Norgate, 1872, p 121)

"Chiefly inhabited"? That means business was run the these "wealthy Jews". (Is there any other kind?) "We are angry with the billionaire owners who ran the banks and pretty much everything else in this country".

And sometimes this anger moves beyond words: "An attack at Speyer resulted in the slaying of twelve Jews who refused to convert to Christianity". (S. Eidelberg, The Jews and the Crusaders, Ktav Publishing House, 1996, p 4)

But that was in Speyer, where there were fewer Jews. Mainz was the center of Jewish commerce in the area, and less than 100km distant. Emicho and his army traveled there next. The Jews were running the city (per W.O. Horn, The Rhine: history and legends of its castles, abbeys, monasteries, and towns, Williams and Norgate, 1872, p 121), and wasted no time in sending their "law enforcement staff" to bar the gates. "It was all arrogance and hubris". (Rowena Mason, Iceland falls out of love with its billionaires, Telegraph, 19 Oct 2008 )

Emicho and the Christian forces were outside the city walls. The Jews and their bought politicians and police (per W.O. Horn, The Rhine: history and legends of its castles, abbeys, monasteries, and towns, Williams and Norgate, 1872, p 121) were inside the walls. (S. Eidelberg, The Jews and the Crusaders, Ktav Publishing House, 1996, p 4)

Now you're probably thinking that there was a museum of Jewish culture, and maybe even a Guggenheim museum inside the walls. Surely the citizenry of Mainz loved their Jews, and would defend them?

Well, not quite. Since "The Jews here were especially hated, on account of their usurious customs, and famous for their wealth." (W.O. Horn, The Rhine: history and legends of its castles, abbeys, monasteries, and towns, Williams and Norgate, 1872, p 121) And so "Emicho's arrival in Mainz was greeted by anti-Jewish riots within the barred gates of the city." (S. Eidelberg, The Jews and the Crusaders, Ktav Publishing House, 1996, p 4)

Well, no problem. The Jews had a SWAT team, probably even a secret police force inside the walls.

And for a while, they tried to control the crowds. In the course of their efforts, "a Christian was killed". (S. Eidelberg, The Jews and the Crusaders, Ktav Publishing House, 1996, p 4)

This displeased the Germans in the city even more, and so "Emicho's allies within the city opened the gates". (S. Eidelberg, The Jews and the Crusaders, Ktav Publishing House, 1996, p 4) And so Emicho and the Christian army entered the city. The Jews put up a stiff resistance, but the Christians were angry (as per Bjarni Brynjólfsson cited in Rowena Mason, Iceland falls out of love with its billionaires, Telegraph, 19 Oct 2008 ), and "they killed the Jews, about 700 in number, who in vain resisted the force and attack of so many thousands." (Albert of Aachen cited in Thomas Asbridge, The First Crusade: A New History, Oxford University Press, 2004, p 88)

LESSONS LEARNED / AND LESSONS NOT LEARNED

So have people learned anything in the succeeding 1000 years?

Absolutely!!!

The Jewish bankers "have now disappeared in times of trouble". (Bjarni Brynjólfsson cited in Rowena Mason, Iceland falls out of love with its billionaires, Telegraph, 19 Oct 2008 ) The Jewish bankers in Mainz in 1096 knew full well there were "times of trouble" for their people. They could easily have disappeared. But "It was all arrogance and hubris". (Rowena Mason, Iceland falls out of love with its billionaires, Telegraph, 19 Oct 2008 ) And so they stayed in the city with their pet politicians and police. And paid the price for all the years of usury, arrogrance and hubris when "In Mainz the entire Jewish community was massacred between 25 and 29 May by the army of Count Emicho of Leiningen, the most savage enemy of the Rhineland Jewry". (I.S. Robinson, Henry IV of Germany 1056-1106, Cambridge University Press, 1999, p 302)

But they didn't. And the Jewish bankers of Iceland did!!

And the people of Europe? Have they learned anything between 1096 and 2010? “We are angry with ourselves for being foolish and for not having listened to the voices that warned us about the recklessness of the banks.” (Bjarni Brynjólfsson cited in Rowena Mason, Iceland falls out of love with its billionaires, Telegraph, 19 Oct 2008 ) "Among them was Alonso de Hojeda, a Dominican prior of Seville, who devoted all his energies to making the crown aware of the reality of the danger from Jews and false converts". (Henry Kamen, The Spanish Inquisition: a historical revision, Yale University Press, 1998, p 43)

Foolish, destitute, desperate, angry.

And?

We'll never know.

Because these bankers "have now disappeared in times of trouble". (Bjarni Brynjólfsson cited in Rowena Mason, Iceland falls out of love with its billionaires, Telegraph, 19 Oct 2008 )

Source: Profitable Poison in Small Packages

Family Guy: Jewish Psychological Warfare

2010-04-23T07:30:00.000-04:00

Family Guy: Jewish Psychological Warfare

Family Guy is one of the most popular Television shows in North America and Europe. The show is an animated cartoon that focuses around a family called the Griffins and located in the fictional city of Quahog, Rhode Island. The man of the family is Peter, a supposed Irish Catholic but you would never guess it from watching the show. The woman of the house is Lois, a Protestant. They have two sons, Chris and Stewie, and a daughter, Meg. There is also a talking dog that lives with the family, Brian. The creator of the show is Seth MacFarlane, a notorious leftist, militant atheist, Obama supporter, and an aggressive supporter of homosexual "marriage." The co-creator of the show is David Zuckerman, a Jew.

Zuckerman and other Jew personalities seem to play a key role in the writing of and over all execution of Family Guy. In an interview with Maxim Magazine, MacFarlane stated, “... most of the writers on our show are Jewish.”[1] The objective of this show, like all other forms of Jewish entertainment, is distraction and demoralization of the host populace.

Let’s take a look at some of the people involved with production of the Family Guy program:

Seth MacFarlane – Leftist (Creator, voice-actor, writer)
David Zuckerman – Jew (Co-creator, producer, writer)
Alex Borstein – Jew (Voice actress, writer)
Seth Green – Jew (Voice actor)
Mila Kunis – Jew (Voice actress)
Allison Adler – Lesbian Jew (Writer, “partner” of Sarah Gilbert)
Jim Bernstein – Jew (Writer, story editor)
Ricky Blitt – Canadian-Jew (Co-executive producer, writer)
Matt Fleckenstein – Jew (Writer)
Andrew Goldberg – Jew (Writer)
Neil Goldman – Jew (Writer)
David A. Goodman – Jew (Writer)
Alec Sulkin – Jew (Writer, dating Jewish “comedian” Sarah Silverman)
Matt Weitzman – Jew (Writer)

As one would expect from a Jew-produced program, the show constantly ridicules Christians and Christian beliefs.

One particular episode entitled "Brian Wallows and Peter's Swallows" references Christ in a typically Jewish fashion, alluding to a Jewish myth regarding Jesus. In this episode, Peter decides to grow a beard however, Lois tells him that she hates beards and doesn't want him to follow through with it. Peter tries to defend his decision by saying, "Why do you think Jesus Christ was so popular? Huh? 'Cause all them magic tricks?"

The Jewish fable (Titus 1:14) that Christ was a "magician" comes directly from the Babylonian Talmud, the most authoritative religious text of Judaism. Sanhedrin 43a claims that He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and was sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship:

"On the eve of the Passover, Yeshu the Nasarean [Jesus the Nazarene] was hanged [i.e. on a cross]. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald went forth and cried, ‘He is going forth to be stoned because he has practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy. Any one who can say anything in his favour, let him come forward and plead on his behalf.’ But since nothing was brought forward in his favour he was hanged on the eve of the Passover! — ‘Ulla retorted: Do you suppose that he was one for whom a defence could be made? Was he not a Mesith [enticer], concerning whom Scripture says, ‘Neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him’?"

In another episode titled "The Father, the Son, and the Holy Fonz," another shot at Christianity is taken. Francis, the Catholic father of Peter, comes for a visit. He demands that Stewie, the infant boy of the Griffins, be baptised. After Stewie gets baptised, he falls ill. What a surprise!

The 7th Season of Family Guy (2008-2009) consists of three different episodes which all focus on evangelizing the viewer with MacFarlane’s religion of atheism. The first episode of the season, called “Love Blactually,” atheism and the likes of such pseudo-intellectuals as Richard Dawkins are portrayed in the highest regard while Theism is portrayed as being for the “weak-minded.” As the title of this episode suggests, it also glorifies miscegenation between Black men and White women. The episode immediately following this one, entitled “I Dream of Jesus,” again continues with MacFarlane’s trend of mocking the image and person of Christ. Finally, the third anti-Christian episode of the season is called “Not All Dogs Go To Heaven.”

Here is a summary of this episode from Wikipedia.org:

“Meg catches the mumps [...] While recovering in bed, Meg becomes a born-again Christian after watching Kirk Cameron on television and begins driving everyone crazy with her beliefs. Meg is appalled to learn that Brian is an atheist [and] tries to convince Brian to repent and convert to Christianity, but he repeatedly refuses. Finally […] Meg spreads the word of his atheism around Quahog, which is generally intolerant of atheism, making Brian a social outcast. Upon being made a pariah, Brian is banned from every bar and convenience store in Quahog, making it impossible for him to drink. Desperate, and suffering from delirium tremens […] Brian fakes his repentance and convinces Meg to cease all hostilities against him so he can get back to drinking. But when Meg takes him to burn books that are "harmful to God", a disgusted Brian admits his bluff and attempts to convince Meg that what she's doing is wrong. When Meg refuses to listen, Brian points out to her that if there were truly a loving God, then he wouldn't have created Meg to be so unattractive like Peter (rather than inheriting Lois' looks), and that she wouldn't be living with people who all hold her in contempt and otherwise pretend that she doesn't exist. Feeling ashamed, Meg realizes that Brian is right and apologizes for her behavior, confessing that she doesn't know how she can feel loved. Brian then assures her that the answers are inside herself, and the real meaning of their existence is out there somewhere.”

It couldn't be more obvious. In short, this episode is a recruiting tool for MacFarlane and his ideological ilk. MacFarlane’s attempts to discredit Christianity to his audience consist of several tactics: Straw men (misrepresenting an opponent’s position in order to make it seem ridiculous so that it is easily knocked down), Glittering Generalities (oversimplifications), Loaded Words (Using emotionally-charged words, negative or positive, to influence the reaction), and Ridicule (Attempting to arouse dislike against a person or idea by name-calling, sarcasm or jokes); i.e. arguments only people without the ability to think critically would fall for. Unfortunately, that ability isn't very common amongst the younger generation.

A more recent example of the show's virulent anti-Christian bias and its propagation of common anti-Christian polemics is the episode which first aired in the United States on 27 September 2009 entitled “Road to the Multiverse.” The episode’s plot is that Stewie breeds a winning pedigree pig for Quahog Clam Day, and reveals to Brian that he got the pig from a parallel universe. He shows Brian the remote that allows him to access different parallel universes; each depicting Quahog in the same time and place, but under different conditions. They first visit a very futuristic version of Quahog in which we are told that Christianity never existed; therefore the "dark ages" never occurred, which MacFarlane depicts as making humanity one thousand years more technologically advanced. This is just another example of the myths being passed off as "history" today; that the Christian religion (particularly the Catholic Church) was responsible for an alleged lack of or suppression of scientific advancement and allegedly “persecuted” scientists.

In reality, the Catholic Church has been in the forefront of research and science for the past 2000 years. In fact, the Jesuits were responsible for many scientific discoveries and technological advances of the Middle Ages. The Catholic Church is responsible for the very first Universities, many of her Churches of the Middle Ages doubled as observatories for studying the stars. The Pontifical Academy of Sciences has its roots in the Academy of the Lincei which was founded in Rome in 1603 as the first exclusively scientific academy in the world. The first modern hospitals and schools, which all encouraged and supported science, arose thanks to the Catholic Church.[2] But, it should come as no surprise that the historical truth and accuracy of their propaganda is not what interests the writers of Family Guy, so much as the propaganda's effectiveness.

Family Guy creator, Seth MacFarlane, is very vocal about his atheistic religion and his overall disdain for theistic religion. However, any individual who has viewed at least several episodes of Family Guy (or those of MacFarlane’s other show on FOX, American Dad!) will notice that when MacFarlane ridicules a theistic religion it is nearly always Christianity, and certainly never Judaism, as it does not appear nearly as much as Christianity does, and most of the jokes are based upon stereotypes about Jews (typically about Jews and money), and not necessarily stereotypes that are negative. When they make mock Christianity, they ridicule Christian doctrine, the Bible, Church practices, portray Jesus or God in very insulting ways, and insinuate that followers of Christianity are either “stupid,” “retarded,” or “hypocritical.” This not merely “poking fun” at a controversial issue as Family Guy supporters would have you believe: it is outright defamation against Christians and an attempt to portray the Christian religion in a negative light with the intent to inspire hatred and contempt against it. Further, it is used to proselytize and indoctrinate viewers with MacFarlane's own religious views and moral-relativist, hedonistic "values."

This is exactly what the Jewish-produced Hollywood films and television shows have been pushing for the last several decades. In fact, they’ve already conditioned many of the Gentiles in our countries into actually hating Christianity; they’ve conditioned them into thinking that Christians are some kind of nutcases who want to tell them how to live. Other inferences commonly applied to Christians by the Jewish entertainment industry are that they “dumb,” “stupid,” “gullible,” “tyrannical” or “evil," ad infinitum, ad nauseum. This is the intention of these Jewish media moguls: to make Christianity unappealing to White Gentiles.

Further secular evidence of the creators of Family Guy's agenda for the demoralization of America's youth are present, as well. A few episodes of Family Guy show the dog, Brian, kissing a human in a lusty and romantic manner, as well as going off to bed to sleep with and, presumably, have sex with a human. Some instances of this can be seen in the episodes “Brian in Love,” “Brian Wallows and Peter's Swallows,” and “The Former Life of Brian.”

The Jew is conditioning viewers, slowly but surely, toward not flinching when we hear of someone having sex with an animal.

We also find the baby, Stewie, becoming increasingly more homosexual and sexually explicit. The character, Herbert, an elderly man who lives in the Griffin’s neighborhood, is also seen constantly making references to homosexuality and pedophilia. The Parents Television Council accurately notes that, "Although the show is intended to be a satire of the American family, it depends heavily on oblique sexual innuendo and sexual themes such as incest, bestiality, and pedophilia."[3]

The Jew knows exactly what they’re doing with this kind of programming. They are creating new, neuro-associations in subtle ways. Instead of associating disgust with a grown man having sex with a child; the programming eventually chips it away. Keep in mind that NAMBLA (“The North American Man/Boy Love Association”) an organization which exists to promote pedophilia is run by Jews. Arnold Schoen, a Jew, is a key member along with other Jews.

You might also notice, at least every other episode of Family Guy will feature a joke about Hitler, Jews, anti-Semitism, Nazis, or the Holocaust; literally, at least every other episode. Several episodes in which these subjects feature a prominent role are “Road to Europe,” “Family Goy,”“When You Wish Upon a Weinstein,” and “Road to Germany.”

Why so many jokes about Jews and Nazis? This is to control dissent. If the Jew is the one that laughingly trashes Jews, then it can be readily swept aside while the constant reminder that Hitler was supposedly an evil man who oversaw the “slaughter of millions of Jews” keeps people believing that, despite no amount of hard evidence to support the Holocaust myth. No mass graves have ever been found, only a few pictures of Jews that unfortunately died of Typhus that starved to death in the labor camps because Allied Forces were bombing the supply lines and they couldn’t get enough food to the prisoners in the labor camps.

Yet, another Jew show Robot Chicken (created by Jew, Seth Green) features a reference to the Holocaust in season 3, episode 2 as well as well as a skit called “Dicks With Time Machines” about a time-traveler who wreaks havoc on history but then ends World War II by humiliating Hitler. The title then changes to “Heroes With Time Machines.” The primary function of comedy shows such as this is demoralization and if you have the patience to sift through what the Jew-owned TV networks are feeding you and your loved ones, you’ll soon many find references to Jews, Nazis, Hitler, and so forth.

References

[1] “Q. So, for starters: What’s your problem with the Jews?

A. Well, ironically, most of the writers on our show are Jewish. And since I assume you’re referring to the unaired ‘Weinstein’ episode [from the Family Guy, Vol. 2 DVD box set], I’ll tell you where that came from. The plotline involves Peter believing that his life would be better and more convenient if he befriended a Jew. I have a lot of Jewish friends, and when I first came out here [to Los Angeles], they would not allow me to make purchases on my own. So I’d go to buy a fax machine and my friend Steve, who’s Jewish, would say, ‘You’re not going to do this by yourself, are you?’ And I’d say, ‘Well, yeah—I was going to.’ And he’d say, ‘No, no, no—you need to take a Jew with you.’ So he would go with me and haggle with this guy, and it actually got to the point where I was calling him and saying, ‘Steve, it’s Seth. I’m going to buy a coffee maker. Would you come with me, please, and make sure that I don’t get rooked?’”
(http://www.maximonline.com/articles/...aspx?a_id=5434)

[2] a.) Top 10 Myths About The Middle Ages, b.) Those Terrible Middle Ages! Debunking the Myths – a book review, c.) False statements about life in the Middle Ages, d.) Myths about the Middle Ages, e.) The Pernicious Myth of the "Dark Ages", f.) The Dark Ages, Anti-Catholic Academia and the New Secularism, g.) Five Myths About Christianity, Islam, and the Middle Ages, h.) Dark Ages and Secularist Rages: A Response to Professor A.C. Grayling).

[3] Family Guy - Parents Television Council.

Notes A good portion of this article, including its title, was taken from a video entitled Family Guy: Jewish Psychological Warfare by ProThink.org. The creator of the video states on his blog:

“This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'Fair Use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In Accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.” (Source).

Essential Must-Watch David Duke Videos

2010-04-23T07:15:00.001-04:00

David Duke Video Archive!

David Duke Speaks to the Tea Party!

White Civil Rights?

Should Christians Support Israel?

Jewish Terrorism Against America!

The Dynamics of the Jewish Elite!

Affirmative Action is Racist !!

The Purim Celebration of Hate

Purim II: Promotion of Genocide“

Hollywood Basterds by David Duke

Do Jews Control the Media? — The LA Times Says Yes!

Shoe Bombers, crotch bombers, 9/11 and Israel

The Zionist Matrix of Power in America

The Zionist Red Army by David Duke

Stop the Genocide of European Mankind

David Duke a Tribute to European Women

David Duke “Heart to Heart” Part 1

David Duke “Heart to Heart” Part 2

Hanukkah Hypocrisy by David Duke Part 1

Hanukkah Hypocrisy by David Duke Part 2

Holocaust Survivor Redefines AntiSemitism by David Duke

The War on Christmas!

War is Good – Obama Nobel Peace Prize Speech

HISTORY THAT ISRAEL HAS HIDDEN FROM YOU

2010-04-23T07:00:00.000-04:00

Palestine/Israel History since 1878

This video will answer the following questions:

- How were the Jews treated by Arab before 1948?

- Where and how did Zionism start?

- Was Palestine empty when the Jews came?

- What was the population of Arabs in Palestine between 1878 and 1948?

- How many Jewish immigrants arrived to Palestine between 1878-1948 and how did the UN partition plan divided Palestine between Arab and Jews? Did Israel stick to this plan?

- Did the Jews find “land without people” as they claim?

- How did the Jews treat the Palestinians in the occupied lands?

- How did the Nakba start and at what cost?

- Where the Palestinians expelled before or after the neighboring Arabs countries engaged in a war with the Israeli occupiers?

- What happened to the evicted Palestinian villages? How many were erased?

- Can the Palestinian refugees return to “visit” their occupied villages and lands? And can the Jews visit the occupied lands?

All these questions and more are answered in the above 10 min. documentary. A good video to pass to your friends who like to learn more about the history of the conflict and 1948 Nakba.

Originally appeared AT

Terry Scott Taylor - I Had A Bad Experience With The CIA

2010-04-23T06:45:00.000-04:00

Bobby Darin - That Funny Feeling

2010-04-23T06:30:00.000-04:00

BEST QUOTE OF 2009...

2010-01-15T23:30:00.001-05:00

This is great. Thank you Maynard. curtmaynardsnewestblog.blogspot.com

POLK COUNTY FLORIDA SHERIFF GRADY JUDD

An illegal alien in Polk County Florida who got pulled over in a routine traffic stop ended up 'executing' the deputy who stopped him. The deputy was shot eight times, including once behind his right ear at close range. Another deputy was wounded and a police dog killed. A state-wide manhunt ensued.

The murderer was found hiding in a wooded area and as soon as he took a shot at the SWAT team, officers opened fire on him. They hit the guy 68 times.

Naturally, the liberal media went nuts and asked why they had to shoot the poor undocumented immigrant 68 times.

Sheriff Grady Judd told the Orlando Sentinel: 'Because that's all the ammunition we had.' Now, is that just about the all-time greatest answer or what!

The Coroner also reported that the illegal alien died of natural causes. When asked by a reporter how that could be since there were 68 bullet wounds in his body, he simply replied "when you are shot 68 times you are naturally gonna die."

Yonder Mountain String Band - Angel

2010-01-15T01:32:00.000-05:00

Johnny Cash - Get Rhythm

2010-01-15T01:28:00.000-05:00

Anglo-Saxon Decline

2010-01-15T01:20:00.001-05:00

0 comments

http://www.armedwithknowledge.blogspot.com/

Zionist Jews in New York Congress, Mayor Bloomberg and Atty. General Holder Move Against Second Amendment

2010-01-15T01:07:00.001-05:00

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Senator Gillibrand and Representative McCarthy have introduced the Gun Trafficking Prevention Act of 2009. Ostensibly designed to prosecute gun traffickers, the bill would also deny the Second Amendment to anybody on the so-called terror watch list. The legislation is supported by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, New Yorkers Against Gun Violence, and the Brady Campaign.

The number of unique names on the U.S. terror watch list totals 400,000, newly released FBI data reveals. The Washington Post reported that during a 12-month period ending in March of this year, 1,600 people were nominated daily by the U.S. intelligence community to be put on the list due to ‘reasonable suspicion.’

In July, 2008, the terror watch list contained well over a million names, according to the American Civil Liberties Union.

“Members of Congress, nuns, war heroes and other ’suspicious characters,’ with names like Robert Johnson and Gary Smith, have become trapped in the Kafkaesque clutches of this list, with little hope of escape,” said Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office in July, 2008. “Congress needs to fix it, the Terrorist Screening Center needs to fix it, or the next president needs to fix it, but it has to be done soon.”

Obama did not fix it. Instead, as noted below, his attorney general and two Congress critters from New York are well on their way to making sure over a million Americans are stripped of their constitutional right to own firearms.

PRNewswire-USNewswire

Before the Senate Judiciary Committee November 18th, 2009, Attorney General Eric Holder revealed a stunningly broad and aggressive anti-gun agenda.

“The President of the United States asked that politicians not use the Ft. Hood attack to engage in ‘political theater.’ It appears those committed to attacking gun owners and the Second Amendment simply can’t help themselves and are engaged in blaming guns and gun owners on the heels of this terrorist attack. Sadly it looks like ‘politics as usual,’” said LEAA’s spokesperson, Ted Deeds.

After explaining and defending his decision to give enemy combatants constitutional protections and the right to public trial in civilian courts, Attorney General Holder revealed his support for a national gun owner registration scheme and authorizing the government to ban firearm possession for any person by merely adding that person’s name to the terror watch list.

Drawing reasonable conclusions from what Holder publicly said, we now know:

• Holder wants a national, permanent gun registration system administered by law enforcement. A registration of honest citizens that have cleared the federal background check for gun purchases with those records permanently retained by and shared among law enforcement.

• Holder wants new federal authority to prohibit any person on the federal watch list (reported to be 400,000 names) from buying guns and supports confiscating guns from those on the list who possess them.

Transcribing General Holder: “The position of the Administration is that there should be a basis for law enforcement to share information about gun purchases.” “… [It's not] inconsistent to allow law enforcement agencies to share that kind of information, for that information to be retained and then to be shared by law enforcement.” “It seems incongruous to me that we would bar certain people from flying on airplanes because they are on the terrorist watch list and yet we would still allow them to posses weapons.” {Emphasis added}

LEAA’s Executive Director Jim Fotis said, “Those behind the badge don’t believe more restrictions on honest gun owners is a reasonable, practical or constitutional response to acts of terrorism. As a retired officer, I know that America’s men and women in blue want to fight terrorism, to stop terrorists; not waste time keeping records on innocent gun owners!”

Source

Whitewraithe

Who Rules America?

2010-01-15T01:05:00.000-05:00

By the Research Staff of National Vanguard Books
P.O. Box 330 · Hillsboro · West Virginia 24946 · USA

THERE IS NO GREATER POWER in the world today than that wielded by the manipulators of public opinion in America. No king or pope of old, no conquering general or high priest ever disposed of a power even remotely approaching that of the few dozen men who control America's mass media of news and entertainment.

Their power is not distant and impersonal; it reaches into every home in America, and it works its will during nearly every waking hour. It is the power that shapes and molds the mind of virtually every citizen, young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated.

The mass media form for us our image of the world and then tell us what to think about that image. Essentially everything we know—or think we know—about events outside our own neighborhood or circle of acquaintances comes to us via our daily newspaper, our weekly news magazine, our radio, or our television.

It is not just the heavy-handed suppression of certain news stories from our newspapers or the blatant propagandizing of history-distorting TV "docudramas" that characterizes the opinion-manipulating techniques of the media masters. They exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in their management of the news and the entertainment that they present to us.

For example, the way in which the news is covered: which items are emphasized and which are played down; the reporter's choice of words, tone of voice, and facial expressions; the wording of headlines; the choice of illustrations—all of these things subliminally and yet profoundly affect the way in which we interpret what we see or hear.

On top of this, of course, the columnists and editors remove any remaining doubt from our minds as to just what we are to think about it all. Employing carefully developed psychological techniques, they guide our thought and opinion so that we can be in tune with the "in" crowd, the "beautiful people," the "smart money." They let us know exactly what our attitudes should be toward various types of people and behavior by placing those people or that behavior in the context of a TV drama or situation comedy and having the other TV characters react in the Politically Correct way.

Molding American Minds

For example, a racially mixed couple will be respected, liked, and socially sought after by other characters, as will a "take charge" Black scholar or businessman, or a sensitive and talented homosexual, or a poor but honest and hardworking illegal alien from Mexico. On the other hand, a White racist—that is, any racially conscious White person who looks askance at miscegenation or at the rapidly darkening racial situation in America—is portrayed, at best, as a despicable bigot who is reviled by the other characters, or, at worst, as a dangerous psychopath who is fascinated by firearms and is a menace to all law-abiding citizens. The White racist "gun nut," in fact, has become a familiar stereotype on TV shows.

The average American, of whose daily life TV-watching takes such an unhealthy portion, distinguishes between these fictional situations and reality only with difficulty, if at all. He responds to the televised actions, statements, and attitudes of TV actors much as he does to his own peers in real life. For all too many Americans the real world has been replaced by the false reality of the TV environment, and it is to this false reality that his urge to conform responds. Thus, when a TV scriptwriter expresses approval of some ideas and actions through the TV characters for whom he is writing, and disapproval of others, he exerts a powerful pressure on millions of viewers toward conformity with his own views.

And as it is with TV entertainment, so it is also with the news, whether televised or printed. The insidious thing about this form of thought control is that even when we realize that entertainment or news is biased, the media masters still are able to manipulate most of us. This is because they not only slant what they present, but also they establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible spectrum of opinion.

As an example, consider the media treatment of Middle East news. Some editors or commentators are slavishly pro-Israel in their every utterance, while others seem nearly neutral. No one, however, dares suggest that the U.S. government is backing the wrong side in the Arab-Jewish conflict, or that 9-11 was a result of that support. Nor does anyone dare suggest that it served Jewish interests, rather than American interests, to send U.S. forces to cripple Iraq, Israel's principal rival in the Middle East. Thus, a spectrum of permissible opinion, from pro-Israel to nearly neutral, is established.

Another example is the media treatment of racial issues in the United States. Some commentators seem almost dispassionate in reporting news of racial strife, while others are emotionally partisan—with the partisanship always on the non-White side. All of the media spokesmen without exception, however, take the position that "multiculturalism" and racial mixing are here to stay and that they are good things.

Because there are differences in degree, however, most Americans fail to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizen who complains about "managed news" falls into the trap of thinking that because he is presented with an apparent spectrum of opinion he can escape the thought controllers' influence by believing the editor or commentator of his choice. It's a "heads I win, tails you lose" situation. Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the media masters—and no impermissible fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it.

The control of the opinion-molding media is nearly monolithic. All of the controlled media—television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, motion pictures—speak with a single voice, each reinforcing the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative source of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of people that might allow them to form opinions at odds with those of the media masters. They are presented with a single view of the world—a world in which every voice proclaims the equality of the races, the inerrant nature of the Jewish "Holocaust" tale, the wickedness of attempting to halt the flood of non-White aliens pouring across our borders, the danger of permitting citizens to keep and bear arms, the moral equivalence of all sexual orientations, and the desirability of a "pluralistic," cosmopolitan society rather than a homogeneous, White one. It is a view of the world designed by the media masters to suit their own ends—and the pressure to conform to that view is overwhelming. People adapt their opinions to it, vote in accord with it, and shape their lives to fit it.

And who are these all-powerful masters of the media? As we shall see, to a very large extent they are Jews. It isn't simply a matter of the media being controlled by profit-hungry capitalists, some of whom happen to be Jews. If that were the case, the ethnicity of the media masters would reflect, at least approximately, the ratio of rich Gentiles to rich Jews. Despite a few prominent exceptions, the preponderance of Jews in the media is so overwhelming that we are obliged to assume that it is due to more than mere happenstance.

Electronic News & Entertainment Media

Continuing government deregulation of the telecommunications industry has resulted, not in the touted increase of competition, but rather in an accelerating wave of corporate mergers and acquisitions that have produced a handful of multi-billion-dollar media conglomerates. The largest of these conglomerates are rapidly growing even bigger by consuming their competition, almost tripling in size during the 1990s. Whenever you watch television, whether from a local broadcasting station or via cable or a satellite dish; whenever you see a feature film in a theater or at home; whenever you listen to the radio or to recorded music; whenever you read a newspaper, book, or magazine—it is very likely that the information or entertainment you receive was produced and/or distributed by one of these megamedia companies:

Time Warner. The largest media conglomerate today is Time Warner (briefly called AOL-Time Warner; the AOL was dropped from the name when accounting practices at the AOL division were questioned by government investigators), which reached its current form when America Online bought Time Warner for $160 billion in 2000. The combined company had revenue of $39.5 billion in 2003. The merger brought together Steve Case, a Gentile, as chairman of AOL-Time Warner, and Gerald Levin, a Jew, as the CEO. Warner, founded by the Jewish Warner brothers in the early part of the last century, rapidly became part of the Jewish power base in Hollywood, a fact so well-known that it is openly admitted by Jewish authors, as is the fact that each new media acquisition becomes dominated by Jews in turn: Speaking of the initial merger of Time, Inc. with Warner, Jewish writer Michael Wolff said in New York magazine in 2001 "since Time Inc.'s merger with Warner ten years ago, one of the interesting transitions is that it has become a Jewish company." ("From AOL to W," New York magazine, January 29, 2001)

The third most powerful man at AOL-Time Warner, at least on paper, was Vice Chairman Ted Turner, a White Gentile. Turner had traded his Turner Broadcasting System, which included CNN, to Time Warner in 1996 for a large block of Time Warner shares. By April 2001 Levin had effectively fired Ted Turner, eliminating him from any real power. However, Turner remained a very large and outspoken shareholder and member of the board of directors.

Levin overplayed his hand, and in a May 2002 showdown, he was fired by the company's board. For Ted Turner, who had lost $7 billion of his $9 billion due to Levin's mismanagement, it was small solace. Turner remains an outsider with no control over the inner workings of the company. Also under pressure, Steve Case resigned effective in May 2003. The board replaced both Levin and Case with a Black, Richard Parsons. Behind Parsons the Jewish influence and power remains dominant.

AOL is the largest Internet service provider in the world, with 34 million U.S. subscribers. It is now being used as an online platform for the Jewish content from Time Warner. Jodi Kahn and Meg Siesfeld, both Jews, lead the Time Inc. Interactive team under executive editor Ned Desmond, a White Gentile. All three report to Time Inc. editor-in-chief Norman Pearlstine, a Jew. Their job is to transfer Time Warner's content to target specific segments of America Online's audience, especially women, children, and teens.

Time Warner was already the second largest of the international media leviathans when it merged with AOL. Time Warner's subsidiary HBO (26 million subscribers) is the nation's largest pay-TV cable network. HBO's "competitor" Cinemax is another of Time Warner's many cable ventures.

Until the purchase in May 1998 of PolyGram by Jewish billionaire Edgar Bronfman, Jr., Warner Music was America's largest record company, with 50 labels. Warner Music was an early promoter of "gangsta rap." Through its involvement with Interscope Records (prior to Interscope's acquisition by another Jewish-owned media firm), it helped to popularize a genre whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge Blacks to commit acts of violence against Whites. Bronfman purchased Warner Music in 2004, keeping it solidly in Jewish hands.

In addition to cable and music, Time Warner is heavily involved in the production of feature films (Warner Brothers Studio, Castle Rock Entertainment, and New Line Cinema). Time Warner's publishing division is managed by its editor-in-chief, Norman Pearlstine, a Jew. He controls 50 magazines including Time, Life, Sports Illustrated, and People. Book publishing ventures include Time-Life Books, Book-of-the-Month Club, Little Brown, and many others. Time Warner also owns Shoutcast and Winamp, the very tools that most independent Internet radio broadcasters rely on, and, as a dominant player in the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), was essentially "negotiating" with itself when Internet radio music royalty rules were set that strongly favored large content providers and forced many small broadcasters into silence. (The Register, "AOL Time Warner takes grip of net radio," 8th April 2003)

Ted Turner's Lesson: "Be very careful with whom you merge."

When Ted Turner, the Gentile media maverick, made a bid to buy CBS in 1985, there was panic in the media boardrooms across the country. Turner had made a fortune in advertising and then built a successful cable-TV news network, CNN, with over 70 million subscribers.

Although Turner had never taken a stand contrary to Jewish interests, he was regarded by William Paley and the other Jews at CBS as uncontrollable: a loose cannon who might at some time in the future turn against them. Furthermore, Jewish newsman Daniel Schorr, who had worked for Turner, publicly charged that his former boss held a personal dislike for Jews.

To block Turner's bid, CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish theater, hotel, insurance, and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to launch a "friendly" takeover of CBS. From 1986 to 1995 Tisch was the chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish influence there. Subsequent efforts by Ted Turner to acquire CBS were obstructed by Gerald Levin's Time Warner, which owned nearly 20 percent of CBS stock and had veto power over major deals. But when his fellow Jew Sumner Redstone offered to buy CBS for $34.8 billion in 1999, Levin had no objections.

Thus, despite being an innovator and garnering headlines, Turner never commanded the "connections" necessary for being a media master. He finally decided if you can't lick 'em, join 'em, and he sold out to Levin's Time Warner. Ted Turner summed it up:

"I've had an incredible life for the most part. I made a lot of smart moves, and I made a lot of money. Then something happened, and I merged with Time Warner, which looked like the right thing to do at the time. And it was good for shareholders.

"But then I lost control. I thought I would have enough moral authority to have all the influence in the new company. If you go into business, be very careful with whom you merge.

"I thought I was buying Time Warner, but they were buying me. We had kind of a difference in viewpoint. Then they merged with AOL, and that was a complete disaster, at least so far. I have lost 85 percent of my wealth."

Disney. The second-largest media conglomerate today, with 2003 revenues of $27.1 billion, is the Walt Disney Company. Its leading personality and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew.

The Disney empire, headed by a man described by one media analyst as a "control freak," includes several television production companies (Walt Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television) and cable networks with more than 100 million subscribers altogether. As for feature films, the Walt Disney Motion Pictures Group includes Walt Disney Pictures, Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the Jewish Weinstein brothers, Bob and Harvey, who have produced such ultra-raunchy movies as The Crying Game, Priest, and Kids.

When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family prior to its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome family entertainment. While it still holds the rights to Snow White, the company under Eisner has expanded into the production of a great deal of so-called "adult" material.

In August 1995, Eisner acquired Capital Cities/ABC, Inc., which owns the ABC television network, which in turn owns ten TV stations outright in such big markets as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Houston. In addition, in the United States ABC has 225 affiliated TV stations, over 2,900 affiliated radio stations and produces over 7,200 radio programs. ABC owns 54 radio stations and operates 57 radio stations, many in major cities such as New York, Washington, and Los Angeles. Radio Disney, part of ABC Radio Networks, provides programming targeting children.

Sports network ESPN, an ABC cable subsidiary, is headed by President and CEO George W. Bodenheimer, who is a Jew. The corporation also controls the Disney Channel, Toon Disney, A&E, Lifetime Television, SOAPnet and the History Channel, with between 86 and 88 million subscribers each. The ABC Family television network has 84 million subscribers and, in addition to broadcasting entertainment (some of it quite raunchy for a "family" channel), is also the network outlet for Christian Zionist TV evangelist Pat Robertson.

Although primarily a telecommunications company, ABC/Disney earns over $1 billion in publishing, owning Walt Disney Company Book Publishing, Hyperion Books, and Miramax Books. It also owns six daily newspapers and publishes over 20 magazines. Disney Publishing Worldwide publishes books and magazines in 55 languages in 74 countries, reaching more than 100 million readers each month

On the Internet, Disney runs Buena Vista Internet Group, ABC Internet Group, ABC.com, ABCNEWS.com, Oscar.com, Mr. Showbiz, Disney Online, Disney's Daily Blast, Disney.com, Family.com, ESPN Internet Group, ESPN.sportzone.com, Soccernet.com, NFL.com, NBA.com, Infoseek (partial ownership), and Disney Interactive.

Viacom. Number three on the list, with 2003 revenues of just over $26.5 billion, is Viacom, Inc., headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein), a Jew. Melvin A. Karmazin, another Jew, was number two at Viacom until June 2004, holding the positions of president and chief operating officer. Karmazin remains a large Viacom shareholder. Replacing Karmazin as co-presidents and co-COOs are a Jew, Leslie Moonves, and Tom Freston, a possible Jew. (We have been unable to confirm Freston's Jewish ancestry; he has done work for Jewish organizations and was involved in the garment trade, a heavily Jewish industry, importing clothing from the Third World to the U.S. in the 1970s.)

Viacom produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, owns 39 television stations outright with another 200 affiliates in its wholly-owned CBS Television Network, owns 185 radio stations in its Infinity radio group, and has over 1,500 affiliated stations through its CBS Radio Network. It produces feature films through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing (born Sherry Lee Heimann), who is planning to retire at the end of 2005.

Viacom was formed in 1971 as a way to dodge an anti-monopoly FCC ruling that required CBS to spin off a part of its cable TV operations and syndicated programming business. This move by the government unfortunately did nothing to reduce the mostly Jewish collaborative monopoly that remains the major problem with the industry. In 1999, after CBS had again augmented itself by buying King World Productions (a leading TV program syndicator), Viacom acquired its progenitor company, CBS, in a double mockery of the spirit of the 1971 ruling.

Redstone acquired CBS following the December 1999 stockholders' votes at CBS and Viacom. CBS Television has long been headed by the previously mentioned Leslie Moonves; the other Viacom co-president, Tom Freston, headed wholly-owned MTV.

Viacom also owns the Country Music Television and The Nashville Network cable channels and is the largest outdoor advertising (billboards, etc.) entity in the U.S. Viacom's publishing division includes Simon & Schuster, Scribner, The Free Press, Fireside, and Archway Paperbacks. It distributes videos through its over 8,000 Blockbuster stores. It is also involved in satellite broadcasting, theme parks, and video games.

Viacom's chief claim to fame, however, is as the world's largest provider of cable programming through its Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon, Black Entertainment Television, and other networks. Since 1989 MTV and Nickelodeon have acquired larger and larger shares of the juvenile television audience. MTV dominates the television market for viewers between the ages of 12 and 24.

Sumner Redstone owns 76 per cent of the shares of Viacom. He offers Jackass as a teen role model and pumps MTV's racially mixed rock and rap videos into 342 million homes in 140 countries and is a dominant cultural influence on White teenagers around the world. MTV also makes race-mixing movies like Save the Last Dance.

Nickelodeon, with over 87 million subscribers, has by far the largest share of the four-to-11-year-old TV audience in America and is expanding rapidly into Europe. Most of its shows do not yet display the blatant degeneracy that is MTV's trademark, but Redstone is gradually nudging the fare presented to his kiddie viewers toward the same poison purveyed by MTV. Nickelodeon continues a 12-year streak as the top cable network for children and younger teenagers.

NBC Universal. Another Jewish media mogul is Edgar Bronfman, Jr. He headed Seagram Company, Ltd., the liquor giant, until its recent merger with Vivendi. His father, Edgar Bronfman, Sr., is president of the World Jewish Congress.

Seagram owned Universal Studios and later purchased Interscope Records, the foremost promoter of "gangsta rap," from Warner. Universal and Interscope now belong to Vivendi Universal, which merged with NBC in May 2004, with the parent company now called NBC Universal.

Bronfman became the biggest man in the record business in May 1998 when he also acquired control of PolyGram, the European record giant, by paying $10.6 billion to the Dutch electronics manufacturer Philips.

In June 2000, the Bronfman family traded Seagram to Vivendi for stock in Vivendi, and Edgar, Jr. became vice chairman of Vivendi. Vivendi was originally a French utilities company, and was then led by Gentile Jean-Marie Messier. A board of directors faction led by Bronfman forced Messier to resign in July 2002.

Vivendi also acquired bisexual Jew Barry Diller's USA Networks in 2002. (Diller is the owner of InterActive Corporation, which owns Expedia, Ticketmaster, The Home Shopping Network, Lending Tree, Hotels.com, CitySearch, Evite, Match.com, and other Internet businesses.) Vivendi combined the USA Network, Universal Studios, Universal Television, and theme parks into Vivendi Universal Entertainment (VUE).

After the Vivendi-NBC merger, Bronfman used his considerable personal profits to strike out on his own, and recently purchased Warner Music from Jewish-dominated Time Warner. The current chairman of NBC Universal is a Gentile often associated with Jewish causes, long-time NBC employee Bob Wright. Ron Meyer, a Jew, is president and chief operating officer of Universal Studios. Stacey Snider, also Jewish, is the chairman of Universal Pictures. The president of NBC Universal Television Group is Jeff Zucker, another Jew.

With two of the top four media conglomerates in the hands of Jews (Disney and Viacom), with Jewish executives running the media operations of NBC Universal, and with Jews filling a large proportion of the executive jobs at Time Warner, it is unlikely that such an overwhelming degree of control came about without a deliberate, concerted effort on the Jews' part.

Other media companies: Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation owns Fox Television Network, Fox News, the FX Channel, 20th Century Fox Films, Fox 2000, and publisher Harper Collins. News Corp. is the fifth largest megamedia corporation in the nation, with 2003 revenues of approximately $19.2 billion. It is the only other media company which comes close to the top four.

Its Fox News Channel has been a key outlet pushing the Jewish neoconservative agenda that lies behind the Iraq War and which animates both the administration of George W. Bush and the "new conservatism" that embraces aggressive Zionism and multiracialism.

Murdoch is nominally a Gentile, but there is some uncertainty about his ancestry and he has vigorously supported Zionism and other Jewish causes throughout his life. (Historian David Irving has published information from a claimed high-level media source who says that Murdoch's mother, Elisabeth Joy Greene, was Jewish, but we have not been able to confirm this.) Murdoch's number two executive is Peter Chernin, who is president and chief operating officer—and a Jew.

Under Chernin, Jews hold key positions in the company: Gail Berman runs Fox Entertainment Group; Mitchell Stern heads satellite television division DirecTV; Jane Friedman is chairman and CEO of Harper Collins; and Thomas Rothman is chairman of Fox Filmed Entertainment. News Corporation also owns the New York Post and TV Guide, and both are published under Chernin's supervision. The primary printed neoconservative journal, The Weekly Standard, is also published by News Corporation and edited by William Kristol, a leading Jewish neocon spokesman and "intellectual."

Most of the television and movie production companies that are not owned by the large media corporations are also controlled by Jews.

For example, Spyglass, an "independent" film producer which has made such films as The Sixth Sense, The Insider, and Shanghai Noon, is controlled by its Jewish founders Gary Barber and Roger Birnbaum, who are co-chairmen. Jonathan Glickman serves as president and Paul Neinstein is executive vice president. Both men are Jews. Spyglass makes movies exclusively for DreamWorks SKG.

The best known of the smaller media companies, DreamWorks SKG, is a strictly kosher affair. DreamWorks was formed in 1994 amid great media hype by recording industry mogul David Geffen, former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg, all three of whom are Jews. The company produces movies, animated films, television programs, and recorded music. Considering the cash and connections that Geffen, Katzenberg, and Spielberg have, DreamWorks may soon be in the same league as the big four.

One major studio, Columbia Pictures, is owned by the Japanese multinational firm Sony. Nevertheless, the studio's chairman is Jewess Amy Pascal, and its output fully reflects the Jewish social agenda. Sony's music division recently merged with European music giant BMG to form Sony BMG Music Entertainment, now one of the world's largest music distributors. It is headed by CEO Andrew Lack, formerly president and CEO of NBC—and a Jew. Sony's overall American operations are headed by a Jew named Howard Stringer, formerly of CBS, who hired Lack.

It is well known that Jews have controlled most of the production and distribution of films since shortly after the inception of the movie industry in the early decades of the 20th century. When Walt Disney died in 1966, the last barrier to the total Jewish domination of Hollywood was gone, and Jews were able to grab ownership of the company that Walt built. Since then they have had everything their way in the movie industry.

Films produced by seven of the firms mentioned above—Disney, Warner Brothers, Paramount (Viacom), Universal (NBC Universal), 20th Century Fox (News Corp.), DreamWorks, and Columbia (Sony)—accounted for 94% of total box-office receipts for the year 2003.

The big three in television network broadcasting used to be ABC, CBS, and NBC. With the consolidation of the media empires, these three are no longer independent entities. While they were independent, however, each was controlled by a Jew since its inception: ABC by Leonard Goldenson; NBC first by David Sarnoff and then by his son Robert; and CBS first by William Paley and then by Laurence Tisch. Over several decades these networks were staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and the essential Jewishness of network television did not change when the networks were absorbed by other Jewish-dominated media corporations. The Jewish presence in television news remains particularly strong.

NBC provides a good example of this. The president of NBC News is Neal Shapiro. Jeff Zucker is NBC Universal Television Group president. Reporting directly to Zucker is his close friend Jonathan Wald, formerly an NBC program producer, now a senior consultant for CNBC. David M. Zaslav is president of NBC Cable (and also a director of digital video firm TiVo Inc.). The president of MSNBC is Rick Kaplan. All of these men are Jews.

A similar preponderance of Jews exists in the news divisions of the other networks. Sumner Redstone, Tom Freston, and Les Moonves control Viacom's CBS. Moonves demonstrated his power in 2002 by replacing the entire staff of the new CBS Early Show. He is also a great-nephew of Zionist leader David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first prime minister. Al Ortiz (also a Jew) is executive producer and director of special events coverage for CBS News. Senior executive producer Michael Bass and Victor Neufeld (formerly producer of ABC's 20/20) produce the CBS Early Show; both are Jews.

At ABC, David Westin, who is a Jew according to Jeffrey Blankfort of the Middle East Labor Bulletin, is the president of ABC News. The senior vice president for news at ABC is Paul Slavin, also a Jew. Bernard Gershon, a Jew, is senior vice president/general manager of the ABC News Digital Media Group, in charge of ABCNEWS.com, ABC News Productions, and ABC News Video Source.

The Print Media

After television news, daily newspapers are the most influential information medium in America. About 58 million of them are sold (and presumably read) each day. These millions are divided among some 1,456 different publications. One might conclude that the sheer number of different newspapers across America would provide a safeguard against minority control and distortion. Alas, such is not the case. There is less independence, less competition, and much less representation of majority interests than a casual observer would think.

In 1945, four out of five American newspapers were independently owned and published by local people with close ties to their communities. Those days, however, are gone. Most of the independent newspapers were bought out or driven out of business by the mid-1970s. Today most "local" newspapers are owned by a rather small number of large companies controlled by executives who live and work hundreds or even thousands of miles away. Today less than 20 percent of the country's 1,456 papers are independently owned; the rest belong to multi-newspaper chains. Only 103 of the total number have circulations of more than 100,000. Only a handful are large enough to maintain independent reporting staffs outside their own communities; the rest must depend on these few for all of their national and international news.

The Associated Press (AP), which sells content to newspapers, is currently under the control of its Jewish vice president and managing editor, Michael Silverman, who directs the day-to-day news reporting and supervises the editorial departments. Silverman had directed the AP's national news as assistant managing editor, beginning in 1989. Jewess Ann Levin is AP's national news editor. Silverman and Levin are under Jonathan Wolman, also a Jew, who was promoted to senior vice president of AP in November 2002.

In only two per cent of the cities in America is there more than one daily newspaper, and competition is frequently nominal even among them, as between morning and afternoon editions under the same ownership or under joint operating agreements.

Much of the competition has disappeared through the monopolistic tactics of the Jewish Newhouse family's holding company, Advance Publications. Advance publications buys one of two competing newspapers, and then starts an advertising war by slashing advertising rates, which drives both papers to the edge of bankruptcy. Advance Publications then steps in and buys the competing newspaper. Often both papers continue: one as a morning paper and the other as an evening paper. Eventually, though, one of the papers is closed—giving the Newhouse brothers the only daily newspaper in that city. For example, in 2001 the Newhouses closed the Syracuse Herald-Journal leaving their other Syracuse newspaper, the Post-Journal, with a monopoly.

The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than the lack of real competition among America's daily newspapers: it also illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all the organs of opinion control on which they could fasten their grip. The Newhouses own 31 daily newspapers, including several large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of television stations and cable operations; the Sunday supplement Parade, with a circulation of more than 35 million copies per week; some two dozen major magazines, including The New Yorker, Vogue, Wired, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self, House & Garden, and all the other magazines of the wholly-owned Conde Nast group. The staffing of the magazines is, as you might expect, quite Kosher. Parade can serve as an example: Its publisher is Randy Siegel, its editor and senior vice president is Lee Kravitz, its creative director is Ira Yoffe, its science editor is David H. Levy, and its health editor is Dr. Isadore Rosenfeld.

This Jewish media empire was founded by the late Samuel Newhouse, an immigrant from Russia. When he died in 1979 at the age of 84, he bequeathed media holdings worth an estimated $1.3 billion to his two sons, Samuel and Donald. With a number of further acquisitions, the net worth of Advance Publications has grown to more than $9 billion today. The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the Newhouse family was facilitated by newspapers' revenue structure. Newspapers, to a large degree, are not supported by their subscribers but by their advertisers. It is advertising revenue—not the small change collected from a newspaper's readers—that largely pays the editor's salary and yields the owner's profit. Whenever the large advertisers in a city choose to favor one newspaper over another with their business, the favored newspaper will flourish while its competitor dies. Since the beginning of the last century, when Jewish mercantile power in America became a dominant economic force, there has been a steady rise in the number of American newspapers in Jewish hands, accompanied by a steady decline in the number of competing Gentile newspapers—to some extent a result of selective advertising policies by Jewish merchants.

Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue that their editorial and news reporting policies are largely constrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pays the piper calls the tune.

Three Jewish Newspapers

The suppression of competition and the establishment of local monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized the rise of Jewish control over America's newspapers. The resulting ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed instrument of Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by the examples of the nation's three most prestigious and influential newspapers: the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post. These three, dominating America's financial and political capitals, are the newspapers that set the trends and the guidelines for nearly all the others. They are the ones that decide what is news and what isn't at the national and international levels. They originate the news; the others merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in Jewish hands.

The New York Times, with a 2003 circulation of 1,119,000, is the unofficial social, fashion, entertainment, political, and cultural guide of the nation. It tells America's "smart set" which books to buy and which films to see; which opinions are in style at the moment; which politicians, educators, spiritual leaders, artists, and businessmen are the real comers. And for a few decades in the 19th century it was a genuinely American newspaper.

The New York Times was founded in 1851 by two Gentiles, Henry J. Raymond and George Jones. After their deaths, it was purchased in 1896 from Jones's estate by a wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph Ochs. His great-great-grandson, Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper's current publisher and the chairman of the New York Times Co. Russell T. Lewis, also a Jew, is president and chief executive officer of The New York Times Company. Michael Golden, another Jew, is vice chairman. Martin Nisenholtz, a Jew, runs their massive Internet operations.

The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co., 33 other newspapers, including the Boston Globe, purchased in June 1993 for $1.1 billion; eight TV and two radio broadcasting stations; and more than 40 news-oriented Web operations. It also publishes the International Herald Tribune, the most widely distributed English-language daily in the world. The New York Times News Service transmits news stories, features, and photographs from the New York Times by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and magazines.

Of similar national importance is the Washington Post, which, by establishing its "leaks" throughout government agencies in Washington, has an inside track on news involving the Federal government.

The Washington Post, like the New York Times, had a non-Jewish origin. It was established in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins, purchased from him in 1905 by John R. McLean, and later inherited by Edward B. McLean. In June 1933, however, at the height of the Great Depression, the newspaper was forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased at a bankruptcy auction by Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier and former partner of the infamous Bernard Baruch, a Jew who was industry czar in America during the First World War. The Washington Post was run by Katherine Meyer Graham, Eugene Meyer's daughter, until her death in 2001. She was the principal stockholder and board chairman of the Washington Post Company; and she appointed her son, Donald Graham, publisher of the paper in 1979. Donald became Washington Post Company CEO in 1991 and its board chairman in 1993, and the chain of Jewish control at the Post remains unbroken. The newspaper has a daily circulation of 732,000, and its Sunday edition sells over one million copies.

The Washington Post Company has a number of other media holdings in newspapers (the Gazette Newspapers, including 11 military publications); in television (WDIV in Detroit, KPRC in Houston, WPLG in Miami, WKMG in Orlando, KSAT in San Antonio, WJXT in Jacksonville); and in magazines, most notably the nation's number-two weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek.

The Washington Post Company's various television ventures reach a total of about 12 million homes, and its cable TV service, Cable One, has 750,000 subscribers.

The Wall Street Journal sells 1,820,000 copies each weekday and is owned by Dow Jones & Company, Inc., a New York corporation that also publishes 33 other newspapers and the weekly financial tabloid Barron's. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter R. Kann, who is a Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and publisher of the Wall Street Journal.

Most of New York's other major newspapers are in no better hands than the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. In January 1993 the New York Daily News (circulation 729,000) was bought from the estate of the late Jewish media mogul Robert Maxwell (born Ludvik Hoch) by Jewish real-estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. Another Jew, Les Goodstein, is the president and chief operating officer of the New York Daily News. And, as mentioned above, the neocon-slanted New York Post (circulation 652,000) is owned by News Corporation under the supervision of Jew Peter Chernin.

News Magazines

The story is much the same for other media as it is for television, radio, films, music, and newspapers. Consider, for example, newsmagazines. There are only three of any importance published in the United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report.

Time, with a weekly circulation of 4.1 million, is published by a subsidiary of Time Warner Communications, the news media conglomerate formed by the 1989 merger of Time, Inc., with Warner Communications. The editor-in-chief of Time Warner Communication is Norman Pearlstine, a Jew.

Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post Company, under the Jew Donald Graham. Its weekly circulation is 3.2 million.

U.S. News & World Report, with a weekly circulation of 2.0 million, is owned and published by the aforementioned Mortimer B. Zuckerman, who also has taken the position of editor-in-chief of the magazine for himself. Zuckerman also owns New York's tabloid newspaper, the Daily News, which is the sixth-largest paper in the nation.

Our Responsibility

Those are the facts of media control in America. Anyone willing to spend a few hours in a large library looking into current editions of yearbooks on the radio and television industries and into directories of newspapers and magazines; into registers of corporations and their officers, such as those published by Standard and Poors and by Dun and Bradstreet; and into standard biographical reference works can verify their accuracy. They are undeniable. When confronted with these facts, Jewish spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted Turner isn't a Jew!" they will announce triumphantly, as if that settled the issue. If pressed further they will accuse the confronter of "anti-Semitism" for even raising the subject. It is fear of this accusation that keeps many persons who know the facts silent.

But we must not remain silent on this most important of issues. The Jewish control of the American mass media is the single most important fact of life, not just in America, but in the whole world today. There is nothing—plague, famine, economic collapse, even nuclear war—more dangerous to the future of our people.

Jewish media control determines the foreign policy of the United States and permits Jewish interests rather than American interests to decide questions of war and peace. Without Jewish media control, there would have been no Persian Gulf war, for example. There would have been no NATO massacre of Serb civilians. There would have been no Iraq War, and thousands of lives would have been saved. There would have been little, if any, American support for the Zionist state of Israel, and the hatreds, feuds, and terror of the Middle East would never have been brought to our shores.

By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media we are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children, whose attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish films than by parents, schools, or any other influence.

The Jew-controlled entertainment media have taken the lead in persuading a whole generation that homosexuality is a normal and acceptable way of life; that there is nothing at all wrong with White women dating or marrying Black men, or with White men marrying Asian women; that all races are inherently equal in ability and character—except that the character of the White race is suspect because of a history of oppressing other races; and that any effort by Whites at racial self-preservation is reprehensible.

We must oppose the further spreading of this poison among our people, and we must break the power of those who are spreading it. It would be intolerable for such power to be in the hands of any alien minority with values and interests different from our own. But to permit the Jews, with their 3,000-year history of nation-wrecking, from ancient Egypt to Russia, to hold such power over us is tantamount to race suicide. Indeed, the fact that so many White Americans today are so filled with a sense of racial guilt and self-hatred that they actively seek the death of their own race is a deliberate consequence of Jewish media control.

Once we have absorbed and understood the fact of Jewish media control, it is our inescapable responsibility to do whatever is necessary to break that control. We must shrink from nothing in combating this evil power that has fastened its deadly grip on our people and is injecting its lethal poison into our people's minds and souls. If our race fails to destroy it, it certainly will destroy our race.

Media of Our Own

A growing number of White Americans are working to build new media not under Jewish control. National Vanguard Books, the publisher of this pamphlet, also publishes its own full-color magazine of news, thought, and opinion, National Vanguard, a sample of which is available from the address below for $5 in the U.S. and Canada, $8 elsewhere. We also operate a news and comment Web site, updated several times daily, at NationalVanguard.org; and a weekly radio program, American Dissident Voices. The program itself and a broadcast schedule are available at natvan.com and NationalVanguard.org or by writing to the address below. It is vital that we support our own alternative media.

The National Alliance, parent organization of National Vanguard Books, is a membership organization of activists working for White interests and helping to build and fund our new media. For further information on Alliance membership, write to P.O. Box 90, Hillsboro WV 24946 USA.

Copies of this article in booklet form may be ordered from National Vanguard Books, P.O. Box 330, Hillsboro, WV 24946 USA. 10 copies, $6. 25 copies, $9. 100 copies, $20. 1000 copies, $154. Prices include postage. Our book catalogue, listing over 600 books, videos, and audio recordings, is available for $3 postpaid.

This document is also available in an Adobe PDF version.

Ingrid Zundel Comments on the Injustices Ernst Zundel Has Been and Is Still Being Subjected To

2010-01-15T01:02:00.000-05:00

Please circulate and post this letter far and wide!

To all -

now that Ernst Zundel's illegal 7- year incarceration following a political kidnapping is coming to an end, we are working on both sides of the Atlantic to remove the equally illegal 20-year bar on coming back to his family.

So far, I have done the following:

**** I sent a certified, return receipt letter plus notarized summary documentation to TN Senator Lamar Alexander.

Result: I received a prompt, courteous phone call, and the Senator's office is investigating.

**** I sent a certified, return receipt letter plus notarized summary documentation to TN Senator Bob Corker.

Result: After a few days, I received a rather hostile call from his office, telling me "We cannot help you!" I told them that I insisted on a personal visit. Thereupon I was told that I would be notified regarding a convenient appointment.

In a second phone call I was told that Homeland Security had been contacted by Senator Corker's office about Ernst's case - "... they recognized his name" - and "... your husband will not be allowed to come back to the US."

I replied that that was open to challenge - and I would still like to come to the Senator's office in order to present my case personally to the Senator or his representative. After again being strongly discouraged from a personal visit - about a 3-hour drive from where I live - I succeeded in getting an appointment, and I will be there Jan 19. I will keep you informed on the outcome.

**** I sent a certified, return receipt letter plus notarized summary documentation to my Congressman, John Duncan.

Result: So far, there has been no response.

**** I sent a certified, return receipt letter plus notarized summary documentation to Tennessee Governor Bredesen.

Result: So far, there has been no response.

**** I sent a certified, return receipt letter plus notarized summary documentation to the Knoxville Sentinel News.

Result: So far, there has been no response.

**** I sent a certified, return receipt letter plus notarized summary documentation to the German Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, a daily that has, in the past, run several in-depth and rather fair articles on the Zundel Case.

Result: So far, there has been no response.

I will keep my readers informed on what develops next.

Meanwhile, I found this rather interesting exchange on political kidnappings - euphemistically called "Extraordinary Renditions" - between Congressman Jerrold Nadler, D-NY, and then Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales.

[START]

Nadler Demands Answers on Extraordinary Rendition

In letter to Attorney General, Nadler questions legal basis of Administration's policies

TUESDAY, 02 JANUARY 2007

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, U.S. Representative Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), presumptive Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on the Constitution, sent the following letter to U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales:

January 3, 2006

Hon. Alberto R. Gonzales
Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

Dear Mr. Attorney General:

I am writing to follow up on the House Judiciary Committee's Oversight Hearing of the Department of Justice, held on April 6, 2006[1]. During that hearing, you responded on several occasions that you wanted the opportunity to get back to me.[2] To date, you have not yet provided a response to any of my questions. I would appreciate receiving your response no later than January 22, 2007.

Regarding the subject of extraordinary rendition and the case of a Canadian citizen, Maher Arar, we had the following exchange:

Mr. NADLER. Thank you. Secondly, I have a question about the practice of extraordinary rendition, particularly rendition to repressive countries we know practice torture. There's one widely publicized case that illustrates the issue. A Canadian citizen, Mr. Arar, was detained in 2002 at JFK Airport in New York as a suspected terrorist. He was on his way home to Canada, changing planes at Kennedy. He was grabbed by CIA agents, I gather, secretly deported to Syria where he endured 10 months of torture in a Syrian prison.

After the Syrians determined that he didn't know anything about terror, they released him. Upon his release, he declared at a news conference that he had pleaded with U.S. authorities to let him continue on to Canada, where he has lived for over 15 years, and his family, but instead, he was flown under U.S. guard to Jordan, and handed over to Syria, where he had been born, and where he was then tortured.

Does the United States Government claim the authority to kidnap anybody at a U.S. airport, and without any administrative or judicial process of any sort, put that person on a plane to a torture-practicing nation? We do not claim that authority. Or do we?

Attorney General GONZALES. We have international agreements, which we are a party to, where the United States has agreed, has committed, that it will not render someone to another country, where we believe it's more likely than not--

Mr. NADLER. Well, do we claim the authority to render someone to another country-let's assume we believe they're not going to use torture-by what right do we-legal right, do we pick someone up at an airport and deny him the right to continue to Canada which is where he's a citizen of, and send them to Syria without any kind of administrative or judicial process?

Attorney General GONZALES. Well, I'm not commenting as to what actually may have happened or may not have--

Mr. NADLER. Do we claim the right to do that? Whatever happened in that case, is that something we claim the right to do?

Attorney General GONZALES. I don't know, but I would be happy to get back to you on that.

Mr. NADLER. You don't know if we claim the right to do that because the Government defended that in court, your Department defended that in court.

Attorney General GONZALES. Before I comment any further on that, Congressman, I'd like the opportunity to get back to you.

Mr. NADLER. Okay. And let me further ask, since we have done this, and since your Department has defended this in court, specifically in the Eastern District, is this practice limited only to airports, or do we claim the right to take people going about their business, walking on the street, grocery shopping, window shopping, at the mall, suddenly and unexpectedly to grab them and to deport them to places like Syria without any evidence, without any due process? Do we claim that right? And if we don't claim that right, why do we claim it at airports?

Attorney General GONZALES. Mr. Congressman, I'm not going to get into specific, what we do, what we don't do. What I can say is that we understand what our legal obligations are, we follow the law.

Mr. NADLER. Let me ask you the last question then. Can you assure this Committee that the United States Government will not grab anybody at an airport or anyplace in U.S. territory, and send them to another country without some sort of due process?

Attorney General GONZALES. Well, what I can tell you is that we're going to follow the law in terms of what--

Mr. NADLER. Well, does the law permit us to send someone to another country without any due process, without a hearing before an administrative, an immigration judge or somebody? Just grab them off the street and put them on a plane, goodbye without-we've done that. Does the law permit us to do that? Do we claim that right?

Attorney General GONZALES. I'm not going to confirm that we've done that--

Mr. NADLER. Well, wait a minute. That was confirmed in court. There's no question it was done.

Chairman SENSENBRENNER. The gentleman's time--

Mr. NADLER. Do we claim the right to do it?

Chairman SENSENBRENNER. The gentleman's time has expired.

Mr. NADLER. Could he answer the question, please?

Chairman SENSENBRENNER. The gentleman's time has expired. I yield myself the last 5 minutes.[3]

Regrettably, Chairman Sensenbrenner did not afford you the opportunity to provide a clear answer to these questions, free from ambiguity or evasion. You did, as the transcript reflects, offer to get back to me. Please do so. In particular, please respond to the following questions:

1. Without confirming or denying any particular action with respect to any particular individual or any case, is it the position of the United States that we may lawfully take an individual into custody in the United States, remove that person to another country or turn that individual over to the custody of another government without any form of due process? Due process includes the ability to consult with an attorney, a review by an impartial finder of fact and the ability to know the basis for being taken into custody, being removed or turned over to the custody of another country.

2. If the individual is a national of a third country, is it the position of the United States that we are not legally obliged to inform that third country of our actions with respect to that national in any or all cases? If we are so obliged, what is the extent of our legal obligations?

3. To the extent that the United States takes the position that it has the legal authority to take a person into custody and remove that person in the manner described above, is this authority limited to any particular location, such as a location other than the United States, U.S. territories, possessions, or territorial waters, an airport or other point of entry? Or does it apply to any location in the United States? If so, to which locations does this authority apply?

4. To the extent that the United States claims such legal authority, does this authority apply only with respect to foreign nationals, or does it apply equally or to a lesser extent to U.S. citizens? If it applies only to foreign nationals, is the claimed authority further limited by their status, for example a permanent resident, a person out of legal status or a person at a point of entry to the United States deemed not to have entered the United States?

For each of your answers, please provide any filings made by the United States in a legal proceeding relating to the questions posed above. Please also include the legal basis for each answer.

Thank you for agreeing to provide answers to the questions I posed during the Committee's hearing. I realize that the limited time provided during these hearings is not always conducive to a full examination of these very important issues. I look forward to receiving your responses by January 22, 2007.

If you have any questions concerning this request, please feel free to contact me or David Lachmann (202.225.6906) at the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution.

Sincerely,
Jerrold Nadler
Ranking Democratic Member
Subcommittee on the Constitution

[END]

Curt Maynard's Blog

Why I Hate Cats

2010-01-15T01:00:00.001-05:00

By Lenny Johnson

I used to love cats.

Before I had a cat I believed they started off as lovely fluffy balls of fun, who grew into sleek, elegant, and beautifully aloof adults with neat fur and a fantastic hygiene habit. I believed them to be natural French speakers of the animal world, who slept 20 hours a day and enhanced your life throughout.

I had heard the phrase 'you look like something the cat brought in' but never quite understood it. Perhaps it meant that you looked like a mouse, or a vole, or something equally cute.

Then we got a cat. My youngest daughter insisted, so, even though our garden is no more than 500 square feet of towerblock roof, with a couple of tired looking shrubs and a lot of water tanks and what have you, we went for it.

Mittens arrived in a cardboard box, and promptly disappeared behind the sofa for two days. When he was eventually brought out, starving, one thing rapidly became clear. He was ferocious. He scratched, and clawed, and bit anything that came near him. He was not averse to leaping out from hiding places at anyone who passed, delivering a grazing scratch, and then running off laughing catty laughs.

A bell was no good. They disappear within a day. He must rip them off their collar and drop them off the edge of the roof, as we've never found any of them.

Feeding him stupid is no good. He doesn't hunt to eat -- he hunts out of sadism.

We gave him the operation, hoping that with the lack of testosterone he might succumb to a quieter life. It just seemed to enrage him further. (Well, sorry, Mittens, I guess it would.) We tried keeping him in, but I'm not as stony hearted as Mittens, and in the last analysis I lack the iron resolve to forbid a living creature from ever seeing the sky.

We tried putting him on a long leash. A clothes line in fact. But that depended on a collar. And we know what he does with collars.

So we are the proud owners of the Charles Manson of the cat world, and the unhappy owners of Kitty Killing Ground.

Only younger daughter can stroke him, and even she is covered in scratches.

I never turn my back on him -- if he was any bigger, or I was any smaller, or showed weakness in any way, he would be on me.

And the daily carnage on the roof is monstrous. I've lost count of the number of dead birds. And, let's be frank here, not just dead -- dismembered. In the most grisly way. And they're not all left on the roof. Bits and pieces of what used to be beautiful feathered fluttering things regularly litter our hallway, drift up behind tables, start to stink under our bed.

Now I really do understand the true visceral horror of the phrase 'what the cat brought in.'

And I really, really do hate cats.

Lenny Johnson - Culture Warrior, General Groover, and Lover of the Peaceful Way.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Lenny_Johnson

Johnny Cash - Home Of The Blues - 1957

2010-01-14T08:21:00.000-05:00

Northwest Independence Internet Resources

2010-01-14T08:20:00.001-05:00

Did I put this up recently? I can't remember. Damned senility!

WEB SITES AND BLOGS

http://www.northwestfront.org/

http://downwithjugears.blogspot.com/

http://www.northwestrepublic.com

http://northwestfront.ning.com/

http://nwtrilogy.blogspot.com/

(This is Calvin's old blog; I keep it up for the archives and the Northwest Glossary.)

http://covingtonfiction.blogspot.com/

(The webmaster on the above is off drunk somewhere, but the old posts are interesting.)

http://itsaboutsurvival.blogspot.com/

(Gentle Annie's blog)

http://www.davidlane1488.org/

NORTHWEST NOVELS - FREE DOWNLOAD

http://wn-pdfs.tk/

NORTHWEST VIDEO

http://www.youtube.com/user/NorthwestFrontPro#play/uploads

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheColonelHouse

TRICOLOR FLAGS AND MERCHANDISE

http://www.cafepress.com/edelweiss88

http://www.cafepress.com/celticconquest/1041082

http://www.cafepress.com/whitehomeland

(Tricolor flags) edelweiss88_14@yahoo.com

HAC (for intro pack of NF literature) nwnet@earthlink.net

Source:

Thoughtcrime

Zionist Propaganda At Its Worst: Perpetuating The MYTH Of Jewish Superiority

2010-01-14T08:15:00.000-05:00

There has always been a question about why Jews seem to be at the top when it comes to Nobel Laureates, Doctors, Chemists, Scientist, etc. There is constant publications that talk about how a people that constitute only 0.2% of the World's Population have such a high percentage in positions of wealth and power. I am here to explain how that came about, and to show how the MSM usually and very blatantly throws that myth in peoples' faces.

It is all about MONEY. Since the Zionist Jews control most of the world's wealth, usually obtained by devious means and cunning, they are able to automatically give preference to others within their own tribe. When it comes to higher education for example, these criminals automatically give preference to their fellow tribesmen when it comes to University enrolment. It takes a lot of money to go to higher level Universities and Colleges, and since these people have the money to send their youth to these faculties, the graduation classes automatically have a high percentage of Jews.

It takes money to drive businesses and finances. These people have the money. They control the central banks and most of the financial institutions. Therefore the usual high end employees or managers in these firms are usually fellow tribesmen! That is no secret.

Do you not see the pattern, readers? They claim their mental superiority over others, but it is because of their money that they are able to get their people into higher education, wealth, and power. Think about it...HERE is an important question: How many people can afford a Harvard education? Answer: Not many, unless you have the MONEY!!! If others, other than Jews, were able to obtain a Harvard, or a MIT education the way these criminals are able to, then there would definitely be no "superiority"! Therefore for them to claim they are mentally superior to others is not only outright lies, but borders on outright bigotry and racism.

Here is an example of their propaganda that they use to promote their "superiority". I found this article from www.nytimes.com and it is outright lies and distortions. I cannot believe that people would actually believe this garbage, but here is the article for you to read:

The Tel Aviv Cluster

By DAVID BROOKS

Published: January 11, 2010

Jews are a famously accomplished group. They make up 0.2 percent of the world population, but 54 percent of the world chess champions, 27 percent of the Nobel physics laureates and 31 percent of the medicine laureates.

Jews make up 2 percent of the U.S. population, but 21 percent of the Ivy League student bodies, 26 percent of the Kennedy Center honorees, 37 percent of the Academy Award-winning directors, 38 percent of those on a recent Business Week list of leading philanthropists, 51 percent of the Pulitzer Prize winners for nonfiction.

In his book, “The Golden Age of Jewish Achievement,” Steven L. Pease lists some of the explanations people have given for this record of achievement. The Jewish faith encourages a belief in progress and personal accountability. It is learning-based, not rite-based.

Most Jews gave up or were forced to give up farming in the Middle Ages; their descendants have been living off of their wits ever since. They have often migrated, with a migrant’s ambition and drive. They have congregated around global crossroads and have benefited from the creative tension endemic in such places.

No single explanation can account for the record of Jewish achievement. The odd thing is that Israel has not traditionally been strongest where the Jews in the Diaspora were strongest. Instead of research and commerce, Israelis were forced to devote their energies to fighting and politics.

Milton Friedman used to joke that Israel disproved every Jewish stereotype. People used to think Jews were good cooks, good economic managers and bad soldiers; Israel proved them wrong.

But that has changed. Benjamin Netanyahu’s economic reforms, the arrival of a million Russian immigrants and the stagnation of the peace process have produced a historic shift. The most resourceful Israelis are going into technology and commerce, not politics. This has had a desultory effect on the nation’s public life, but an invigorating one on its economy.

Tel Aviv has become one of the world’s foremost entrepreneurial hot spots. Israel has more high-tech start-ups per capita than any other nation on earth, by far. It leads the world in civilian research-and-development spending per capita. It ranks second behind the U.S. in the number of companies listed on the Nasdaq. Israel, with seven million people, attracts as much venture capital as France and Germany combined.

As Dan Senor and Saul Singer write in “Start-Up Nation: The Story of Israel’s Economic Miracle,” Israel now has a classic innovation cluster, a place where tech obsessives work in close proximity and feed off each other’s ideas.

Because of the strength of the economy, Israel has weathered the global recession reasonably well. The government did not have to bail out its banks or set off an explosion in short-term spending. Instead, it used the crisis to solidify the economy’s long-term future by investing in research and development and infrastructure, raising some consumption taxes, promising to cut other taxes in the medium to long term. Analysts at Barclays write that Israel is “the strongest recovery story” in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

Israel’s technological success is the fruition of the Zionist dream. The country was not founded so stray settlers could sit among thousands of angry Palestinians in Hebron. It was founded so Jews would have a safe place to come together and create things for the world.

This shift in the Israeli identity has long-term implications. Netanyahu preaches the optimistic view: that Israel will become the Hong Kong of the Middle East, with economic benefits spilling over into the Arab world. And, in fact, there are strands of evidence to support that view in places like the West Bank and Jordan.

But it’s more likely that Israel’s economic leap forward will widen the gap between it and its neighbors. All the countries in the region talk about encouraging innovation. Some oil-rich states spend billions trying to build science centers. But places like Silicon Valley and Tel Aviv are created by a confluence of cultural forces, not money. The surrounding nations do not have the tradition of free intellectual exchange and technical creativity.

For example, between 1980 and 2000, Egyptians registered 77 patents in the U.S. Saudis registered 171. Israelis registered 7,652.

The tech boom also creates a new vulnerability. As Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic has argued, these innovators are the most mobile people on earth. To destroy Israel’s economy, Iran doesn’t actually have to lob a nuclear weapon into the country. It just has to foment enough instability so the entrepreneurs decide they had better move to Palo Alto, where many of them already have contacts and homes. American Jews used to keep a foothold in Israel in case things got bad here. Now Israelis keep a foothold in the U.S.

During a decade of grim foreboding, Israel has become an astonishing success story, but also a highly mobile one.

NTS Notes: Again, if this article was about anyone else, it would be considered blatant bigotry, but because it is about Jews, it is automatically OK.....This article is a blatant and total Israel "love in". The author of this article claims that Israel is weathering this financial storm that the rest of the world is suffering from because of its economy, but that is an outright lie. They are able to weather the storm because their faithful puppets in the US are still pouring billions of dollars nonstop into their corrupt nation, while people in the US are now out of work and starving!

Again, do you not see the pattern? Any fool can see that with billions of dollars constantly coming in with no strings attached, any "economy" would prosper. If US "aid", and all other private "donations" were suddenly cut off to the Zionist state, I guarantee that Israel would soon collapse economically. "Astonishing success story" my butt! Take that, NY Times!

It is not some type of superiority that these criminals are better off than others, but because of their deceit, lies, cunning, and theft of others. Superiority, my butt!

More to come

northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com

You Can Take That To The Bank

2010-01-14T08:10:00.001-05:00

But whose bank? Haliburton's?

Or his bank?

Or this bank?

What's that about voting again? How about that change? The blight wing is already crying about not enough troops, but this strategy is a mirror image of the Iraqi Surge. What does that mean? It means that the Great Satan is going to pay off the tribal leaders in Afghanistan and Pakistan. That's right. One of the tactics in this strategy is that Satan's filthy lucre won't go directly to the Afghan central government. The Greatest of all Satans knows that the love of money is the root of all evil, and money corrupts. Everyone has their price. Just look at Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

Meanwhile, while the cost of every soldier will approach GSD (Great Satan Dollar) 1 million, White folks all over the country are losing everything:

Health care benefit for the jobless to soon end
By Patrick May

Posted: 12/01/2009 05:15:41 PM PST
Updated: 12/01/2009 05:33:41 PM PST

Jim Kvek packs the family belongings in his San Jose home... (Patrick Tehan, Bay Area News Group)«1234»The happy holidays just got a little unhappier for Jim Kvek.

After losing his job in February, and now facing a possible foreclosure sale of his San Jose house three days before Christmas, the unemployed operations manager learned Tuesday that his monthly government-subsidized health insurance premiums will immediately jump 65 percent to $775.

Kvek, along with thousands of other Americans, will have to pay a lot more for COBRA, the federal program that allows workers to keep their company's health insurance plan after they leave their job. The reduced-cost premiums, one of the goodies in the economic stimulus package signed by President Barack Obama in February, stopped Tuesday for the first wave of recipients.

"I don't have the $500 extra dollars and I'll have to find somebody to borrow the money from before I lose my coverage," said Kvek, 61, who suffers from Parkinson's disease. "This is a huge hardship for me, and I have no Plan B."

Anyone have a Plan B?

accessstlouis.blogspot.com

Who Yo Daddy?

2010-01-14T08:05:00.001-05:00

Picked up from VNN forum:

While hilarious, this is what American society has become, a third world freak show orchestrated by the jew. Compare this to what America once was just 50 years ago. That was when White men should have stood up and started shooting to preserve what they had. But they failed. Now we are stuck with the consequences. See what inaction brings?

Tell me, you patriotard flag wavers out there; is this what you seek to conserve? Hey Soldier! Is this what you're fighting for?

Anyone who has lived around negros knows this video is not the exception, but the rule. Why? It's in the blood. Hundreds of thousands of years in Africa are ingrained into the genes. It is truly said, you can take the African out of Africa but you can't take Africa out of the African. Same with the mestizo. The Indian. The Chinaman. Society is a racial construct. Do not let anyone tell you differently.

http://accessstlouis.blogspot.com/

Anti-Racist Blogger Nicole Nichols Attempting To Out Roanoke Pro-White Activist Section 8 Landlord, Induce Civil Rights Charges Against Him

2010-01-14T08:01:00.001-05:00

Anti-racist blogger Nicole Nichols (pictured at left, with apologies to those with weak stomachs), who founded Citizens Against Hate, is a confederate of Daryl Lamont Jenkins and his One People's Project, and who edits the Nikki's Nest blog, is apparently trying to involuntarily out the real identity of a pro-White activist who is also a Section 8 landlord in Roanoke and who frequently posts comments to her blog. The purpose may be to induce the Virginia state government or even the Federal government to file civil rights charges against the commenter.

Nichols did not post her appeal on her blog. Instead, she sent an e-mail to Roanoke Times blogger Dan Casey, who published it HERE. Here is the text of her e-mail:

I have read your article about Aryan Nations and the problems you might still have there in Roanoke. My name is Nicole Nichols and I am the founder of Citizens Against Hate [from Dan: also here]. I operate a personal blog where some of the racists like to gather and raise a little hell. Bill White used to post over there along with some of the more notorious internet Nazis.

There is a guy on there who calls himself "Hooch" and I have been trying to identify him for some time now to no avail. He claims to own Section 8 property in both NW and SE Roanoke which he rents. He also claims to have a bid in on a couple of Bill's properties that have gone into foreclosure. Much like White, his racism is extreme and this is quite concerning, as you can imagine. I don't know if he is the person you were referencing in your article - but he is definitely one of them who resides there.

You can read some of his posts HERE.

If you have any information on him, I would greatly appreciate a heads up.

Nikki

The comments by Hooch of concern to Nichols are appended to this post on her blog. Hooch describes one of his Section 8 tenants as a "lazy black bitch that is living rent free on Section 8 in one of my properties [and] doesn't have a single Christmas present for her children. I've been telling her for the past 3 months to get a job. Her gas is off so no heat for those babies. They also turned her electric off. And she keeps counting on her crack dealing boyfriend to illegally turn it back on. He went to jail, they turned her utilities off again, she got a check from some church to turn it back on 2 weeks before Christmas and she spent it on herself. Not a single thing for the kids. And still gas. She still has the electric turned on illegally and is using my stoves heat to keep the children alive".

But it's obvious from this and other comments published by Hooch on the post that Hooch, despite the fact that he is pro-White, is actually concerned about the welfare of the black family, particularly the kids. Yet because Hooch frequently posts pro-White comments on Niksnest, Nichols is assuming he's an "extreme racist", and thinks he shouldn't be getting any public funding. So undoubtedly if she can find out the identity of Hooch, she will feed that information to the appropriate civil rights authorities in Virginia and perhaps even the Federal government, with the intent that they will pull Hooch's Section 8 tenants - at best. Perhaps Nichols may also be seeking to derail the prospective sale of the Bill White properties in question to Hooch - a sale which could bring needed revenue to White to pay his accrued legal expenses.

Or at worst, Nichols may be seeking to provoke civil rights authorities into launching a legal inquisition against Hooch through the complaint process. Most individuals targeted with civil rights complaints ultimately settle rather than fight, because fighting such charges can be incredibly expensive. In short, Nicole Nichols is attempting to launch economic warfare against Hooch because she disagrees with his politics.

Nicole Nichols tries to represent herself as the more "moderate, responsible" face of anti-racist activism. She purports to distance herself from the more thuggish characters like Daryl Lamont Jenkins and the organized ARA who physically invade, vandalize, and terrorize pro-White venues like the recent David Irving symposium in Chicago. But Nichols is no different in spirit than her more radical comrades, since anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

Posted by Anchorage Activist

White Reference

Judaized Christianity: Front for New World Order -- Sen. McCarthy

2010-01-14T07:57:00.000-05:00

January 14, 2010

"Your Churches Will Teach the Jew's Religion"

Excerpt from a 1956 speech, "GEORGE WASHINGTON'S SURRENDER" by Senator Joseph McCarthy (1908-1957.)

And many of the people of the land became Jews." Esther 9:17.

"The confession of General Cornwallis (left) to General Washington at Yorktown (Oct. 17, 1781) has been well hidden by historians. History books and text books have taught for years that when Cornwallis surrendered his army to General Washington that American independence came, and we lived happily ever after until the tribulations of the twentieth century."

"Jonathan Williams recorded in his "LEGIONS OF SATAN," 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that "a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown."

Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem a contradiction:

"Your churches will be used to teach the Jew's religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry."

And indeed George Washington himself was a Mason, and he gave back through a false religion what he had won with his army.

"Cornwallis well knew that his military defeat was only the beginning of world catastrophe that would be universal and that unrest would continue until mind control could be accomplished through a false religion. What he predicted has come to pass. A brief sketch of American religious history and we have seen Masonry infused into every church in America with their veiled Phallic religion.

"Darby and the Plymouth Brethren brought a Jewish Christianity to America. Masons Rutherford and Russell started Jehovah Witnesses' Judaism which is now worldwide with their message of the divine kingdom. Mason Joseph Smith started Mormon Judaism with its Jewish teaching of millennialism.

[ Millennialism is the belief that there will be a Golden Age or Paradise on Earth in which "Christ will reign" prior to the final judgment and future eternal state (the New Heavens and New Earth). In fact, this will be the rule of the Masonic Jewish (Illuminati) bankers fronted by the Luciferian Anti-Christ. ed.]

"At the turn of the twentieth century there appeared the Scofield Bible with a Jewish interpretation of the prophecies. With wide use of this "helpful" aid, all the American churches have silently become synagogues. We now have Baptist Jews, Methodist Jews, Church of God Jews, apostate Catholic Jews, and many Protestant Jews throughout America. We are aliens in our own country because of false religion. All are praying for divine deliverance into that "Divine Government" which Cornwallis knew to be the British Empire.

"A false religion has been used to deceive us into allegiance to our enemies of Yorktown and Bunker Hill. No! Not a gun has been fired but the invisible and malignant process of conquering America with the Jew's religion has gone on unabated.

"The Union Jack has been planted in our hearts with religious deception. All has happened "legally," "constitutionally," "freely" and completely within our most sacred trust -- our churches. Religious deception is painless inoculation against truth. It cannot be removed from the conscience with surgery, yet it is the motivator of our actions and directly controls our lives.

"Once man gives over to false religion, he is no longer rational because he originates no thought. His life is controlled by whomever controls his religion.

"The veil of false religion is the sword of Damocles and its power to control humanity defies even the imagination of tyrants who use it."

"This is not to say that George Washington was a traitor willingly, or knowingly. He was beguiled into a Satanic religious order that insidiously controls men's minds. So have American statesmen and military leaders down through the years given aid and allegiance to the enemies of the United States because they did not have knowledge of the invisible subterfuge that stalks this land. My eyes were opened the day my colleague from Ohio handed me Wagner's "FREEMASONRY AN INTERPRETATION." If every American would read it, they would no longer ask why and how it has happened."

----
Related -- "The Pilgrim Society and the English Speaking Union"

henrymakow.com

Voodoo and Ritual Murder Still Popular in Africa

2010-01-14T07:55:00.001-05:00

by Ian Mosley

The U.K. Telegraph recently ran a headline that read “Human Sacrifice Is On The Rise in Uganda.” The article reports “Witch doctors in Uganda have admitted their part in human sacrifice amid concerns that the practice is spreading in the African country. One man said he had clients who had captured children and taken their blood and body parts to his shrine, while another confessed to killing at least 70 people, including his own son. According to officials trying to tackle it, the crime is directly linked to rising levels of development and prosperity – and an increasing belief that witchcraft can help people get rich quickly.”

What’s fascinating about the African obsession with witchcraft is that they often bring it with them. In the Western Hemisphere Haiti and New Orleans are the two most well-known places for African voodoo. Curiously New Orleans was hammered with Katrina several years ago and Haiti was just recently hit with a 7.0 earthquake.

The article notes “…clients came to him in search of wealth. ‘They go and capture other people’s children. They bring the heart and the blood directly here to take to the spirits,’ he said. ‘They bring them in small tins and they place these objects under the tree from which the voices of the spirits are coming.’ The witch doctor, who said he was paid 500,000 Ugandan shillings (around £160) for a consultation, denied any direct involvement in murder or incitement to murder, saying his spirits spoke directly to clients. Moses Binoga, the assistant police commissioner who is head of the Ugandan anti-human sacrifice and trafficking task force, said there were 26 murders thought to be part of ritual sacrifice last year compared with three cases in 2007. ‘We also have about 120 children and adults reported missing whose fate we have not traced,’ he added. ‘From the experience of those whom we recovered, we cannot rule out that they may be victims of human sacrifice.’ ”

It’s hard to believe people would be foolish enough to think that murdering a child might grant them success in business, but actually murdering a child to advance your career? What kind of sick twisted backward person would do something like that? Well, now we know.

This is 2010, right? Despite having been in contact with the White man for hundreds of years first through early explorers and missionaries, then through colonial rule and later on indirectly through radio, TV, films and the Internet, Africans just don’t want to evolve. They should have absorbed some notion of civilization, but instead every African nation seems to degenerate into violence, dictatorship and finally voodoo.

Every White tenet of compassion, human dignity, and advanced thought simply seems to roll off them like water off a duck’s back. White men have walked on the moon and found cures to an increasing list of diseases, but Africans are carrying out human sacrifices of children to help their careers to this day.

davidduke.com

The Truth About Torture

2010-01-14T07:50:00.000-05:00

By Curt Maynard

The following sentence is an extremely important element of this short essay and is necessary for establishing whether or not is can be understood by the reader.

“We, the people of the United States of America,” are some of the most deluded and lied to people on this entire planet.”

We’re deluded because we’ve been lied to so much for so long that many of us literally cannot comprehend the obvious. A veritable “cradle to grave” process. We invite the liars into our homes each and everyday, for hours on end. We willingly submit our wives, children, and friends to the pernicious effects of the same lies we ourselves often embrace. The only saving grace we have is that more often than not, we’re unaware of the facts I just stated above. Sadly, we Americans, all of us, will in all probability be made to suffer for the lies we freely, albeit ignorantly swallow on a daily basis. There is no real innocence in ignorance.

Curt, how is it that we allow ourselves to be lied to?

Reader, we watch the television, we watch television news, often we accept the lies it forces down our throats. We literally invite the enemy into our living rooms. The erroneous ideas we pick up from it are too many to list, but allow me to say that it’s [the television‘s] primary purpose is not to entertain, as we tend to believe, but to indoctrinate.1.

One of the greatest lies recently fomented by the media and supported by the many compromised liars in our government is the idea that the United States military has apprehended dangerous terrorists and holds them in places like Guantanamo Bay Cuba [Gitmo]. We’re led to believe that our government is protecting us from these dangerous criminals and occasionally finds it necessary to torture some of them in an effort to extract information from them that will help our government conduct its “war on terror.”2. This just isn’t the case, when was the last time you heard that our government stopped an act of terror as a result of torturing one of these alleged “Islamo-Fascists?” Don’t get me wrong, I’m certain our “altruistic, kind and benevolent” government and its spokesperson, the Zionist media, have made such claims, but when was the last time they were proven true? The media constantly makes claims that turn out to be false, but that doesn’t stop them from broadcasting their lies from coast to coast for days, weeks, and months, and then when their lies are exposed, as is often the case, retractions are nonexistent. The government and media literally doesn’t care if their lies are exposed any longer, the point of telling the lie was to get it out in front of the public, which they did in their initial broadcasts, when their lies are exposed, in this day and age, they just simply ignore the facts and bury the story. My more astute readers are aware of the thousands of times this has happened since September 11th. Sadly, the average individual isn’t. They, the average reader, might start with the very true story of Asher Karni, and how his crimes were buried by the western media, despite the fact that they amount to what may well be the single greatest act of terrorism committed by an individual in the last 100 years.

The television and our government do their best to convince us, the American people, that it is necessary to torture various Muslims in an effort to protect us from them. The truth is, our government and military torture them in an effort to coerce them to confess to acts of terrorism our own government is committing. THAT is the big secret. THAT is the big lie.

There really aren’t any Muslim’s out there seeking to kill us all with evil weapons of mass destruction. There really aren’t any Muslims out there that want to force the Christian west to accept Islam or die. They really do not hate us for our freedom. The fact of the matter is, they just want to be left in peace. Because of the empirical fact that Muslim’s don’t hate us for our freedom and because they really aren’t conspiring to drop nerve agent on us, or saturate us with weaponized anthrax spores, or drop nuclear weapons on our cities, it is important for the United States government to make it appear as though this is what they’re doing. In order to do this, our government needs to “create” acts of terror, I.e. the 1993 WTC bombing, the USS Cole, 9-11, the London Subway bombing, the Madrid train bombing, most recently the so-called Christmas, underwear bomber; the list goes on and on.

It wouldn’t do any good if our illustrious government wasn’t able to apprehend some of these so-called terrorists responsible for the orchestrated crimes carried out by the Mossad and CIA., they need to produce a patsy or scapegoat, you know, in order to convince us, the American lemming public that they’re competent enough to protect us, and to produce a culprit that can then be identified and blamed for something they didn‘t do. Most people aren’t willing to confess to crimes they didn’t commit, thus it is necessary for select individuals to get them to confess. Hmmm, how do you suppose this might be done? Torture perhaps? Seymour Hersh, one of the VERY few Jews I might actually believe to be somewhat righteous, has already exposed the undeniable fact that the United States government has threatened to have the children of some Muslims raped in order to extract confessions. What would you do if one of your children was brought before you and you were told that they’d be raped [in front of you] if you didn’t “confess?”3 By the way, this included both male and female children. - and in most Islamic society’s, a shame based culture, the rape of one’s children, not to mention one’s male children, is perhaps the ultimate persuader, followed closely by contact with menstrual blood, something the CIA and US Military [As taught to them by Israeli Jews] have been known to expose Muslim prisoners to for the purposes of extracting a so-called confession.

So, my suggestion is, do not believe a goddamn thing the US government or media says about anything. Wake up America, you’re being taken for a ride.

1. When indoctrinate is understood to mean “train, teach, coach, instruct, and program.”

2. And by so doing, protect us.

3. People like myself are immune to this procedure as we’d prefer to see our own children die and thus avoid the oncoming New World Order, which promises only to enslave humanity., rather than help bring about the slavery of mankind, and thus our own children’s slavery as well. And yes, I do believe this.

curtmaynardsnewestblog.blogspot.com

Tony Rice - Freeborn Man

2010-01-14T07:48:00.001-05:00

News From The West

‘Judeo-Christian’ Devil Pig McVety

Is Charles McVety a “spiritual Bernie Madoff”?

An eternal curse on mankind?

Zionist Rulers of Saudi Arabia

Jewish Roots of the Saudi Ruling Family

Translated from Arabic

A Vision of the Future?

Read more articles at his new blog, The Voice Of Phaedrus at tvop888.blogspot.com

Free Speech and Google

Curtis Maynard's Obituary

Curtis Maynard's Murder/Suicide: Something Just Does NOT Add Up!

Man kills ex-wife, then himself

Lake Jackson murder-suicide followed bitter divorce, woman's lawyer says

By PEGGY O'HAREHOUSTON CHRONICLE

April 23, 2010, 12:17AM

Divorce final last year

First homicide in years

Hitler’s Most Trenchant Speech - Biographer John Toland

Pawns in the Game

Judaic attitudes to non-Jews

Emicho von Leiningen vs. Arrogance and Hubris / Analysis of 1096 First Crusade / Thor Björgólfsson Learned Well

Family Guy: Jewish Psychological Warfare

Essential Must-Watch David Duke Videos

HISTORY THAT ISRAEL HAS HIDDEN FROM YOU

Palestine/Israel History since 1878

Terry Scott Taylor - I Had A Bad Experience With The CIA

Bobby Darin - That Funny Feeling

BEST QUOTE OF 2009...

Yonder Mountain String Band - Angel

Johnny Cash - Get Rhythm

Anglo-Saxon Decline

Zionist Jews in New York Congress, Mayor Bloomberg and Atty. General Holder Move Against Second Amendment

Obama did not fix it. Instead, as noted below, his attorney general and two Congress critters from New York are well on their way to making sure over a million Americans are stripped of their constitutional right to own firearms.

Who Rules America?

Ingrid Zundel Comments on the Injustices Ernst Zundel Has Been and Is Still Being Subjected To

Why I Hate Cats

Johnny Cash - Home Of The Blues - 1957

Northwest Independence Internet Resources

Thoughtcrime

Zionist Propaganda At Its Worst: Perpetuating The MYTH Of Jewish Superiority

The Tel Aviv Cluster

You Can Take That To The Bank

Who Yo Daddy?

Anti-Racist Blogger Nicole Nichols Attempting To Out Roanoke Pro-White Activist Section 8 Landlord, Induce Civil Rights Charges Against Him

White Reference

Judaized Christianity: Front for New World Order -- Sen. McCarthy

Voodoo and Ritual Murder Still Popular in Africa

The Truth About Torture

Tony Rice - Freeborn Man

By PEGGY O'HARE
HOUSTON CHRONICLE